Corbon .44 Special 200-gr. DPX Report...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Stephen A. Camp

Moderator In Memoriam
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,430
Today I was surprised that the opportunity to go to the range materialized. I wanted to try Corbon's new 200-gr. DPX load in .44 Special. My primary shooter in this caliber is an S&W Model 24 with a 6 1/2" barrel, but I chose the medium-size Taurus Model 431 with its 3" barrel because it was more likely to be carried for protection than the N-frame Smith & Wesson, and DPX is envisioned as a defense load against human aggressors.

44CorbonDPXTaurusammotile3.jpg
This is the revolver used with the DPX ammunition. I believe that this model is discontinued, but it was the only other .44 Special I own and the one more likely to be carried concealed for protection.

I shot the DPX over the chronograph and 10 shots yielded an average velocity of 1013 ft/sec from the 3" barrel. The lowest velocity of the string was 987 ft/sec, which exceeds Corbon's listed velocity of 950 ft/sec.

44CorbonDPXbox4.jpg
In this picture we see the listed stats for the .44 Special DPX ammunition. Every shot fired over the chronograph exceeded the nominal velocity shown.

Accuracy was more than satisfactory. I fired the revolver DA-only at 7 yards to see if the revolver was manageable. Felt recoil was not excessive at all and DA control did not suffer. At 15 and 25 yards, groups were shot slow-fire and single-action from a rest. Ammunition that will not group holds no appeal to me.
The DPX grouped very well.

44CorbonDPXTaurus7ydtarg1.jpg
This was not shot "combat style" but in slow, deliberate double-action. I wanted to see if recoil would force me to readjust my grip and also check it for accuracy. It did not force any grip changes.

The DPX ammunition was fired in both water and super-saturated newsprint, which was soaked for 24 hours and drained 30 minutes before shooting.

44CorbonDPXwpvswaterrightexp1.jpg
The bullet on the right was fired into water. The two on its left were shot into the soaked newsprint. Average penetration in the newsprint was 8 1/2" compared to the reported 14 1/2" in 10% ballistic gelatin.

Extraction was easy and initially I was able to literally shake fired cases from the cylinder without using the ejector rod until enough shooting dirtied the gun a bit.

44CorbonDPXexpprimerandbullet1.jpg
At the left is an expanded 200-gr. 44 Special DPX. They're loaded by Corbon in Winchester cases and are firmly seated. The bullet is cannulured to prevent unseating from recoil, something that could prevent the cylinder from turning. On all cartridges examined, the roll crimp was nicely done and uniform. Fired primers shows no signs of excessive pressure.

I found this ammunition to be consistent in its expansion characteristics. Ten shots were fired into the soaked newsprint and the average recovered dimensions were 0.718 x 0.722 x 0.655" tall. X-bullets, being homogeneous copper alloy through and through do not fragment nor lose but miniscule bullet weight at all when used within their expected velocity envelope. None of the expanded bullets lost enough weight to be measured.

44CorbonDPXbullet1.jpg
The X-bullet used in Corbon's ammunition is made completely of a copper alloy. There is neither lead core nor jacket. It is designed to expand via six stiff and sharp-edged "petals."

For those interested in a considerably more detailed report, just click on this link:

http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/Corbon 44 Special DPX Report.htm

I was and am extremely impressed with this ammunition in .44 Special. For factory ammunition for self-protection, this is my first choice.

For more information on this ammunition, go to www.corbon.com

Best.
 
Thanks, I'm gonna get a couple hundred rounds and switch to these from Hornady XTP 180 grain loads. in my S&W 296.:cool:
 
If these prove to be accurate from my 3"
bulldog i'll doing the switch myself.I
tired 200gr gold dots but they just were
not accurate enought.The newer silvertips
i use have a huge cavity and are accurate
but are slower compared to the DPX.
 
Cor-Bon seems to have hit the nail on the head with this type of ammo.

i have yet to read of a problem with this ammo, or a test in which it did not do as claimed by the manufacturer.


a light recoiling round of +p velocity, in a middle weight for the caliber that expands picture perfectly AND penetrates the "accepted" 12-14" of ballistic test medium, this is good stuff.

the rounds profile also seems to lend itself to reliable semiauto feeding.


Mr Camp, thanks again for an outstanding article.
 
Hello and thank you. I'm glad the information was of use. I've tried several of the DPX loads and for me, the ones that have really impressed me were the 9mm, mid-power 357 for smaller revolvers, and the .44 Special. I'm going to try some of the .38 Super DPX in the future.

Best.
 
Mr. Camp, thanks for the review! I've been curious about the Cor-Bon load for the .44 spl., myself. I have had a hard time finding a load that I trust. I still use my .44 as a backup to my main carry gun. I'd be very interested in your review of the .38 Super also. Next time I get out hog hunting, I might have to take both along for "testing". Thanks again.
 
Fastastic report. These new-tech hollowpoints continue to push the performance envelope for all handgun cartridges, and particularly those with reduced velocities.

Thanks for your time and efforts.
 
This almost matches McPherson's description of a good pistol cartridge. This is a rare thing in revolver calibers.

If it was 8 grains heavier it would be close to the sectional density of the 230 grain .45.

Sounds like just the ticket for my 696.
 
A useful and encouraging review.

Since the DPX gives 200 gr @ 1000 fps from a 3" barrel, it should be good for at least as much from a 4" gun like my S&W 629 home defense piece. That's good territory -- what I'd handload a defense round at if I did that.

The ammo is very expensive (Cor-Bon site says $32 / 20 -- ouch!). However, I'm going to knuckle under and buy a few boxes.
 
Hello, sir. Yup, it's high, but I'm loaded up with it and will cough it up for a load like that...just not plinking fodder to be sure.

FWIW, the nominal velocity listed on the box was reportely from a 4" bbl and I think it was a Model 629.

Best.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top