Could this guy be the gun owner's candidate?

Status
Not open for further replies.

LiquidTension

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2003
Messages
2,881
Location
SC
From WND:

ELECTION 2004
Producer intent on 'Trading Places' with Bush
Hollywood award-winner wants to 'bring freedom back to America'

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: December 2, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern



© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

The Hollywood community has been anything but silent during the Bush administration, but an award-winning movie producer plans to back up his words with a run for the presidency.

Aaron Russo – producer of popular films such as "Trading Places," starring Eddie Murphy and Dan Akroyd, and Bette Midler's "The Rose" – told WorldNetDaily he will officially throw his hat in the ring tomorrow as an independent candidate.


Aaron Russo

"There's a large vacuum," said Russo, once a candidate for Nevada governor, with "no Democratic candidate of any significance" challenging George Bush.

"I want to do what Ross Perot did, what Jesse Ventura did, and I want to come out and speak the truth – be plain-spoken, tell it like it is, and bring America back to its Constitution and Bill of Rights," Russo said.

Both parties lie to us, he asserted, and neither follows the Constitution.

"I'm frustrated by that," said Russo, "and want to bring freedom back to America."

Russo joined the Libertarian Party after losing the GOP gubernatorial primary to Kenny Guinn in 1998. Russo picked up 26 percent of the vote in a four-way race and planned to run an independent campaign in 2002, but was forced to pull out to concentrate on overcoming bladder cancer, which he says he did.

The Brooklyn native has been awarded a Tony, an Emmy, a Grammy and has had nominations for six Academy Awards and two Golden Globe Awards. He also was the first Hollywood movie producer to garner a $1 million fee. Additionally, he helped Bette Midler rise to stardom as her manager and created a politically oriented television program, "Aaron Russo's Mad As Hell."

"I believe in individual freedom," he said. "I don't believe in a big, monolithic state."

Whether the leadership is Democratic or Republican, Russo contended, "you have $44 trillion in unfunded liabilities, a Federal Reserve that is broken, a situation in Iraq which I think is disgusting, and you have both parties stopping people from bearing arms. Where is that in the Constitution?"

"I believe there are millions and millions of unheard voices in America who would come out and vote for someone they believed in," he said.

Russo calls the Iraq conflict "a pre-emptive war based on a series of lies" and a "gross injustice to the American people and the people of Iraq."

"Iraq was not a threat to me, and personally I'd be more afraid of George Bush than I would of Saddam Hussein," he said.

Russo continued: "George Bush is the one who passed the Patriot Act … the one who can wiretap my phones, who can go into libraries and have sneak-and-peak provisions."

Saddam Hussein," he said, "didn't do those things to me. I wasn't afraid of Saddam Hussein."

Russo believes there is no connection between Iraq and the war on terror and insists the response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks is to protect the borders, stem the tide of illegal immigration and go after the people who committed the atrocities.

"I think we have the means to do that without having a war against a country that had nothing to do with it," he said.

Russo, who founded the short-lived Constitution Party in 1994, joined the Libertarian Party in 1999, but no longer is a member.

He said, ultimately, he might align himself with a party, but his intent now is to be independent and to bring people from as many different parties together under one roof.

"When you face the facts, the two political parties have destroyed America's Constitution and the Bill of Rights," he said. "We keep being told, if you don't vote for one of the two parties, you are wasting your vote. Well, I feel just the opposite; I feel if you vote for the two parties you are wasting you're vote, because nothing is going to change."

On his website, he stakes out his main points in a video message, using new technology he says will allow wide distribution via e-mail.


1. Both political parties lie to us, and neither can be trusted.
2. Our economy is a disaster.

3. We're losing our right to free speech.

4. Both parties passed the Patriot Act, a crime against all Americans.

5. Both wage war against medical marijuana and alternative medicine.

6. Both attack our right to bear arms.

7. Both parties overtax, overspend and over-regulate.

8. Where is the gold owned by the American people? Neither party will address this issue and we need answers.

9. Both parties station our troops around the world rather than protecting our borders from terrorism and illegal immigration.

10. Both parties are guilty of starting the war in Iraq.

11. Both parties want to keep our troops there indefinitely.

===========================================

link to story


Yeah, he does his share of Bush bashing, but if he's serious about RKBA...I'd vote for him. Doesn't like the Patriot Act, either. He's a little off about the economy though. I guess he hasn't checked the market recently? Or the consumer confidence numbers?

Does anyone have any more information on this guy - like specific quotes regarding gun ownership?
 
He's a little off about the economy though. I guess he hasn't checked the market recently? Or the consumer confidence numbers?
Not necessarily wrong, at least in the long run. What goes up, must come down.

Tax cuts are great, but not when govt spending and debt is going through the roof. Can anyone spell "inflation" ...? But that won't come until after the 04 election so who cares?

But this guy makes too much sense to get elected.

I wonder who he will pick for a running mate ... Ted Nugent ...? :D
 
Well, if the world wasn't full of sheeple that think voting 3rd party is 'throwing your vote away'.. it'd be a landslide victory.

But sadly, the sheeple of the world want soo badly to fit in, they just vote for the idiot they think will win.
 
1. Both political parties lie to us, and neither can be trusted.
True enough.
2. Our economy is a disaster.
I think he made up this talking point a few months ago.
3. We're losing our right to free speech.
Debatable, especially given the proliferation of internet based speech such as blogs.
4. Both parties passed the Patriot Act, a crime against all Americans.
Debatable again, but I'll give him this point, since I don't like most of the act either.
5. Both wage war against medical marijuana and alternative medicine.
I think the War on Drugs has pretty much proven to be a failure, and from a libertarian point of view, is anti-freedom and personal responsibility in the first place, but I just can't get excited about this one.
6. Both attack our right to bear arms.

7. Both parties overtax, overspend and over-regulate.
True. Far too true.
8. Where is the gold owned by the American people? Neither party will address this issue and we need answers.
I don't know anything about this issue. I don't know if he has a point or if he's off with the black helicopter crowd here.
9. Both parties station our troops around the world rather than protecting our borders from terrorism and illegal immigration.
Bringing all the troops home isn't going to win the war on terrorism. Unfortunately, the best way to win is to go out there, hunt the bastards down, and kill them.

Illegal immigration is a separate issue from military deployments, unless you're planning to fortify, mine, and guard the entire border. And the entire Army, National Guard, and Reserve isn't big enough to do that.

10. Both parties are guilty of starting the war in Iraq.

11. Both parties want to keep our troops there indefinitely.
I think Iraq was something that needed to be done, and the troops need to stay there until that job is complete. And it's going to be a while.

---------------------

OK, I like his positions on RKBA, and taxing, spending, and regulating. But when it comes to national security policy, he sounds like he's channelling Howard Dean. And that means I wouldn't vote for him.
 
OK, I like his positions on RKBA, and taxing, spending, and regulating. But when it comes to national security policy, he sounds like he's channelling Howard Dean. And that means I wouldn't vote for him.

What he said!:)
 
OK, I like his positions on RKBA, and taxing, spending, and regulating. But when it comes to national security policy, he sounds like he's channelling Howard Dean. And that means I wouldn't vote for him.
Thirded. Its sentiment like this that keeps me compromising my vote. I always felt the pre-emption doctrine was a bad reason to float around, but it wasn't what we justified the war on Iraq on, and it isn't the bad precedent many seem to think it is- not unless we have four UN Resolutions and a dozen years of unfufilled cease fire terms along with the preemption, it isn't happening again.
 
Saddam Hussein," he said, "didn't do those things to me. I wasn't afraid of Saddam Hussein."
Again with the "As long as Saddam was only killing his own people it was none of our business. He wasn't hurting me."
 
Okay, this is a Libertarian candidate, and so is loved by many on THR.

He is, however, the producer of "Trading Places."

We on THR often get upset when gun handling or gun use is misrepresented or distorted in movies. In fact, some THR members get so upset that they boycott those movies.

As one who traded commodities for more than a few years, I can tell you that "Trading Places" completely distorted and misrepresented how commodities trading actually works, the monies involved, and the limit moves. The OJ floor-traders scene was as completely unrealistic as any scene from a Rambo movie.

A small nit to pick, but if this guy is your hero, apply the same standards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top