MicroBalrog
member
Court Rejects Davidian Claim Against U.S.
Tue Jul 15, 9:52 AM ET Add U.S. National - AP to My Yahoo!
By ALAN SAYRE, Associated Press Writer
NEW ORLEANS - A federal appeals court rejected an attempt by survivors to collect damages from the government for the deadly 1993 confrontation outside Waco, Texas, between federal agents and members of the Branch Davidian cult.
Without dissent, a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (news - web sites) late Monday turned aside contentions that a lower court judge who ruled against the survivors was biased.
Scores of Branch Davidian members, including leader David Koresh, were killed in 1993 when government agents stormed their compound after a weekslong standoff. Survivors have been pursuing a wrongful death claim for years.
In September 2000 in Waco, U.S. District Judge Walter Smith rejected their lawsuit, backing the government contention that agents did not use excessive force in their tear gas assault on the compound. Smith found the Davidians themselves set the fire that killed nearly 80 men, women and children.
The appeal before the 5th Circuit basically dealt with one question: Was Smith biased against the Davidians because of remarks he made during the trial and his past relationships with government attorneys?
"We conclude that appellants' allegations do not reflect conduct that would cause a reasonable observer to question Judge Smith's impartiality," Chief 5th Circuit Judge Edith Jones wrote for the panel.
Attorneys for the survivors did not immediate return calls seeking comment Tuesday morning.
The Davidians had argued that Smith's comments on and off the bench showed "deep-seated antagonism" and "preconceptions" about the group, whose beliefs encompassed fierce hostility toward the government.
As an example, the survivors said Smith had called one Branch Davidian follower "crazy" and a murderer.
But government attorneys said Smith "displayed patience and diligence wading through enormously complicated legal and factual claims."
On Feb. 28, 1993, federal agents stormed the Branch Davidian compound looking for stockpiled automatic weapons and hand grenades. Four federal agents and three Davidians were killed in the clash.
For 51 days, the government attempted to get cult followers to leave the compound. On April 19, agents fired tear gas rounds into the compound and fire destroyed it.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030715/ap_on_re_us/davidians_appeal
Tue Jul 15, 9:52 AM ET Add U.S. National - AP to My Yahoo!
By ALAN SAYRE, Associated Press Writer
NEW ORLEANS - A federal appeals court rejected an attempt by survivors to collect damages from the government for the deadly 1993 confrontation outside Waco, Texas, between federal agents and members of the Branch Davidian cult.
Without dissent, a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (news - web sites) late Monday turned aside contentions that a lower court judge who ruled against the survivors was biased.
Scores of Branch Davidian members, including leader David Koresh, were killed in 1993 when government agents stormed their compound after a weekslong standoff. Survivors have been pursuing a wrongful death claim for years.
In September 2000 in Waco, U.S. District Judge Walter Smith rejected their lawsuit, backing the government contention that agents did not use excessive force in their tear gas assault on the compound. Smith found the Davidians themselves set the fire that killed nearly 80 men, women and children.
The appeal before the 5th Circuit basically dealt with one question: Was Smith biased against the Davidians because of remarks he made during the trial and his past relationships with government attorneys?
"We conclude that appellants' allegations do not reflect conduct that would cause a reasonable observer to question Judge Smith's impartiality," Chief 5th Circuit Judge Edith Jones wrote for the panel.
Attorneys for the survivors did not immediate return calls seeking comment Tuesday morning.
The Davidians had argued that Smith's comments on and off the bench showed "deep-seated antagonism" and "preconceptions" about the group, whose beliefs encompassed fierce hostility toward the government.
As an example, the survivors said Smith had called one Branch Davidian follower "crazy" and a murderer.
But government attorneys said Smith "displayed patience and diligence wading through enormously complicated legal and factual claims."
On Feb. 28, 1993, federal agents stormed the Branch Davidian compound looking for stockpiled automatic weapons and hand grenades. Four federal agents and three Davidians were killed in the clash.
For 51 days, the government attempted to get cult followers to leave the compound. On April 19, agents fired tear gas rounds into the compound and fire destroyed it.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030715/ap_on_re_us/davidians_appeal
What a surprise. One gov. flunky decides another gov. flunky wasn't prejudiced in his rulings against someone injured by their boss and sueing that same boss. Kind of like the judge who didn't like the "not guilty" verdict brought in by the jury in the (surviving)Davidian's trial so he threw it out and found them all guilty. 
:banghead: Welcome to the new world. This will do sooo much to increase respect for the legal "system". Doubt if it will even make the back pages of most papers.
