HarrrUMPH!!!!
General Geoff--
Olympic shooting events tend to favour pure accuracy over practicality.
You appear to be saying that the sheer ability to hit what one is aiming at is impractical. I respectfully beg to disagree. I think that for example, Carlos Hathcock, Jerry Miculek, Daniel Boone, and Davy Crockett would likewise disagree.
"Practical" pistol seems to say that it's OK to be a little off, as long as you are shooting "minute of bad guy." No problem there, and in reality, a bad guy isn't going to score you up or down. Neither will a p. dog--it's either dead or down its hole.
Shooting at frying pans, just to hear the "klonk," well...
So, everything besides Practical Pistol is "Impractical Pistol???"
But if you're competing, there has to be a way to keep score--that's why we use paper targets with
scoring rings.
Oh, and then there's Silhouette. My hat is off to the one who can consistently down the 8" tall rams, at 100 meters--from offhand, no sling. If that kind of skill isn't practical, what is??
Now, sheer, pure, accuracy--It's been said (although not by me) that Bullseye Pistol is real shooting, and everything else is just fooling around. Now as to rifles, there's benchrest, F-class, High Power, Smallbore Position Shooting--and we score 'em all on sheer, pure, accuracy, nothing more and nothing less. Try it--Being Good At It is REALLY tough. Believe me. BTDT. And for all my struggles, I'm only slightly good at it. But impractical???