Now and again somebody will post the opinion that the seven and eight shot revolvers are more likely to go out of time because of the added weight of another round. Yesterday I found an old thread from about three years ago on the Firing Line.
On that thread people kept going on and on that the M27/28 is more likely to go out of time because the N frame cylinder is so heavy - especially due to the fact that with the .357 models the cylinders are heavier because there is more steel. According to the posters the 57 and 29 don't have that problem because more steel has been bored out for the larger calibers (41 and 44 magnum). The posters stressed that if you insist one rapid firing the 27/28 you'll totally bugger up the gun.
Well a quick check revealed that the 686 seven shot model weighs 38 ounces unloaded while the six shot 686 weighs in at 40 ounces. I'm assuming because that extra seven hole that has been bored out makes the cylinder ,henceforth the gun, lighter. So which is it?
On that thread people kept going on and on that the M27/28 is more likely to go out of time because the N frame cylinder is so heavy - especially due to the fact that with the .357 models the cylinders are heavier because there is more steel. According to the posters the 57 and 29 don't have that problem because more steel has been bored out for the larger calibers (41 and 44 magnum). The posters stressed that if you insist one rapid firing the 27/28 you'll totally bugger up the gun.
Well a quick check revealed that the 686 seven shot model weighs 38 ounces unloaded while the six shot 686 weighs in at 40 ounces. I'm assuming because that extra seven hole that has been bored out makes the cylinder ,henceforth the gun, lighter. So which is it?