Well now...
Ive had 2 SA's and a hell of alot more of the 75 DA's. The SA is better in some regards and not as good in some also. The biggest downfall is the plastic trigger. It does offer a Sprongy feel that euclid pass's on....but
"I expected the trigger to be better than the CZ 75B models. I was wrong. I could feel the plastic trigger flex when I pulled the trigger...and the trigger break wasn't that great. It was creepy and gritty. I can't figured out why I bought the darn thing. I guess I thought that since it was an SA only trigger it would be crisper. It was not true. I think the SA models suck and one would be better off with the 75B, which should cost less than the SA model line."
Dude...Sorry you think "they suck" if you shot mine...trust me. I doubt highly yould think it sucks.
The gun differs from the standard B model in more ways than the trigger.
Its got a different frame with an more upswept beavertail..much like a 97B.
It has the extended mag release for faster mag reloads in Comp shooting.
The 9mm is the ONLY 9mm with the full width slide rails, putting more weight over the muzzle for quicker followup shots.
If the trigger is the only reason "they suck".....hmmmmm. Ill argue with great verve. The OEM trigger sucks....Yes, I agree...but in general the gun is setup better than the DA version for certain things...like Comp shooting.
Mind you, if they would use the Champion hammer/sear/trigger for an out of the box 1-2# trigger...that breaks like a fully smithed 1911 race gun does...the OEM Champion does also....then Id be first in line....
In the meantime, mine breaks at 3#'s and is by far and away the best non 1911 SA trigger Ive pulled! But its not stock either and by no ones definition, does IT SUCK!....
Shoot well