Dan Wesson rechamber?

Status
Not open for further replies.

no.5enfield

Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2007
Messages
273
Location
College Station,TX
I'm considering buying a Dan Wesson 44 and having it rechambered in 45 Colt. Who would I talk to about that? I bought a SRH Alaskan for that purpose, but it's around $2k for that job... I'm thinking the DW is an easier platform to start with.
 
That's true, but they are rare.
That would be the issue i see, have the frame threaded for 45 barrels and the cylinder reamed. I couldnt see doing it the other way (changing the threads on the barrel) you would lose the ability to buy various barrels (if you find them). Maybe just get a 454 casull and use it as a 45 colt on steroids- easiest solution . Thats what i did too, i was trying to hotrod 45 colt until i ran out of space, got a couple 454s and never had any regrets.
Whats the final configuration you want?
 
A decent gunsmith can turn a .45 barrel blank down and thread to match the frame and shroud. I want a 5-6" double action, full lug that can handle 300gr + bullets at 1300fps.
 
That's a tough one.
Maybe a custom barrel for a 45 redhawk ? Don't know about cost though. I've seen the Alaskan conversions and they look nice but it's big $ as you've said.
 
You can rechamber the cylinder easily enough but a custom barrel is required. Not only are the frame threads different between the .44 Mag and the .45 Colt, you can't retap the frame to accept a factory barrel if you managed to find one. Luckily, a .45 caliber barrel with .44 threads would be easy to make for almost any gunsmith. You could also have the .44 barrel rebored. I think Dave Clements used to do this conversion.
 
A less expensive and possibly better solution would be to purchase a S&W .460 magnum. You would have a new gun with factory warranty that could shoot .460 mag, .45 colt, and .454 Casull. It is available in several barrel lengths and is built on the heavy X-frame. Shooting heavy .45 Colt loads would not phase this double action revolver.
 
A less expensive and possibly better solution would be to purchase a S&W .460 magnum. You would have a new gun with factory warranty that could shoot .460 mag, .45 colt, and .454 Casull. It is available in several barrel lengths and is built on the heavy X-frame. Shooting heavy .45 Colt loads would not phase this double action revolver.
I looked at that option when I did this a few years ago. Losing a round with a cylinder that long and a gun that heavy didn't make sense for me, I'm not the biggest S&W fan either but if they had a configuration I liked , I'd buy it.
 
Why would the conversion be $2000?

Jack Huntington has had to do exactly that to my DW .44 because the original cylinder had a bad chamber. Barrels are threaded the same so it's just a matter of making some .45 liners for the .44 shrouds. Will be on the lookout for another .44 cylinder so I can switch back and forth.

I don't see how the X-frame would even be an option. DW's are heavy but not 'that' heavy.
 
The ruger alaskan conversion starts at $2k from Bowen. Mr. Huntington couldn't give me a price last time i called. He was trying to line up a new EDM shop. I am sure the DW would be much cheaper.
 
I had considered that, until i started reading about chamber and barrel spec being all over the place, causing poor accuracy and velocity loss. I like the idea of having a 44 cylinder bored out, so i know consistency is there.
The bore on my toklat was undersized and rough. I sent it back and all was well when it returned, didn't need to ream the throats - accuracy is good now, was bad when I got it.
 
The ruger alaskan conversion starts at $2k from Bowen. Mr. Huntington couldn't give me a price last time i called. He was trying to line up a new EDM shop. I am sure the DW would be much cheaper.
That's a lot to spend for virtually no gain.
 
$2000 is way too much for such a basic conversion but Bowen is rather high. That said, I'd buy a Toklat and be done with it. Chamber discrepancies do not affect .454's.
 
What kind of money are you looking to spend? I'm leaning pretty heavy towards a Taurus raging hunter in 454 Casull. Then I should be able to run hot 45 Colt loads or most factory 454 ammo.
 
There is something to be said for current production guns in factory configurations. Especially ones that'll see a lot of high pressure heavy loads- you never know what's going to say "adios!"
@Sneakshot92 - I've heard good things about the raging hunter line, taffin likes it.
 
I'm not a big fan of X frames. I like a tough, packable gun in .45 or .44.
Easy then. S&W model 25. 6 shot DA/SA 45 Colt with a 6.5 inch barrel. Weighs about 42 ounces unloaded. Packable to me in bear country.

*Edit
I'm positive the model 25 is an N Frame gun.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top