Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DC Carry ruling... finally

Discussion in 'Legal' started by AFRetired, Jul 26, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. AFRetired

    AFRetired Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2008
    Messages:
    25
    Finally, a ruling on the DC carry issue. I'm sure it will be appealed to SCOUS.


    "A federal judge in the District of Columbia on Saturday overturned the city’s total ban on residents being allowing to carry firearms outside their home, declaring the law “unconstitutional” in a landmark decision for gun-rights activists"

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...arry-rights-unconstitutional/?intcmp=obinsite
     
  2. Midwest

    Midwest Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    Messages:
    2,561
    Location:
    Kentucky
    BREAKING: DC’s Ban on Right To Carry Overturned

    BREAKING: DC’s Ban on Right To Carry Overturned

    This is not speculation, this isn't someone's opinion, this is the real deal.

    http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/07/daniel-zimmerman/breaking-dcs-ban-right-carry-overturned/


    "Gun rights advocate extraordinaire Alan Gura reports that the DC District Court just overturned the District of Columbia’s ban on the right to carry firearms."

    Here is the ruling

    https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2009cv1482-51

    Also read here

    http://alangura.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/DCT_OPINION.pdf

    .
     
  3. aarondhgraham

    aarondhgraham Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2012
    Messages:
    1,559
    Location:
    Stillwater, Oklahoma
    This is great news,,,

    This is great news,,,
    But the cynic in me says,,,
    DC will drag this out for many years

    I'm impatient is all.

    Aarond

    .
     
  4. splithoof

    splithoof Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,053
    Thank you for posting that link…..
    While the appeals will be certain, and the process very long, it is still good news. Perhaps in my lifetime this will eventually bleed down to Californiastan, and effect meaningful, practical change. The politicians and their minions will continue to drag their diamond coated titanium heels all the way to the end, but in the end I think liberty will prevail. Another glimmer of hope in a statist dust storm.
     
  5. Twiki357

    Twiki357 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,939
    Location:
    Prescott Valley, AZ
    Emily Miller (Fox5 DC): “The court ordered the city to now allow residents from the District and other states to carry weapon within its boundaries.” I sure like that other states part. If it stands as implied, it could also open the door for national reciprocity.
     
  6. Yo Mama

    Yo Mama Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,884
    Someone buy Gura a beer!

    You the man!!!
     
  7. splithoof

    splithoof Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,053
    Not only beer for Gura, but DIAPERS for the politicians. The politicians of Leftist Los Angeles may in the future really need them, especially the chief of police.
     
  8. Willie Sutton

    Willie Sutton Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2,026
    Just logged on to share the news, and see it's already been posted.

    Nice news for a Saturday!


    Willie

    .
     
  9. pendennis

    pendennis Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Messages:
    643
    While I'm very glad for the citizens of D.C., and those who would enter the District, I would like to know why McDonald isn't applicable, and eliminating all these separate actions.

    McDonald recognized that the 14th Amendment applied to the several states, ergo protecting 2nd Amendment rights.
     
  10. Field Tester

    Field Tester Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,058
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Wow, wow, wow!
    This ruling is going to be felt in a lot more places than just DC
    First the 9th Circuit and now this. Hopefully we can keep this momentum.
     
  11. mgkdrgn

    mgkdrgn Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,914
    Location:
    Lexington, SC
    So, they switch from "no permits" to "may issue" ... and issue none.

    Big whoop.
     
  12. bushmaster1313

    bushmaster1313 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,592
    Location:
    Peoples Republik of New Jersey
    Right

    it don't mean squat until the Supreme Court says that may issue is unconstitutional.
     
  13. ClickClickD'oh

    ClickClickD'oh Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,227
    Location:
    Lewisville, Tx
    "May Issue" hasn't been doing so well in the courts either these days.
     
  14. Midwest

    Midwest Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    Messages:
    2,561
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Now we have to work on getting that "may issue" changed in New Jersey, Maryland, Hawaii, New York City and the other counties in NY and California that are "may issue" as well as Rhode Island which 1/2 the state is "may issue".
     
  15. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    34,366
    Location:
    Central PA
    Make sure you've read the whole ruling before you decide it ISN'T AWESOME.

    It would seem that's the exact problem the plaintiffs filed for relief from (one of them).



    In its decision, the court specifically ORDERS that DC is enjoined from enforcing it's law D.C. Code § 22-4504(a).

    So they can't enforce their no-carry law, and in fact it seems they can't even require a license to carry at all!
     
  16. GlowinPontiac

    GlowinPontiac Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    585
    Location:
    Central CT
    I have a feeling the first person to test this out by carrying in DC with no permit is going to be in for a world of hurt. The police and politicians are going to be very angry and looking for someone to make pay for this.
     
  17. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    34,366
    Location:
    Central PA
    So are you saying you expect them to ignore the court's order? Or just that they'll harass with other charges?
     
  18. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    34,366
    Location:
    Central PA
    My simplified summation of the decision is this:

    1) DC can still require a permit to possess a handgun.
    2) DC HAS to issue that permit, if no legitimate reason is found not to.
    3) DC HAS to issue that permit to folks who reside in DC and outside of DC too.
    4) IF a person has been issued a permit to possess, they are legal to carry it.
    5) When applying for a permit to possess, "Carry for defense outside the home" will be an acceptable reason.

    Did I miss anything?
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2014
  19. Willie Sutton

    Willie Sutton Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2,026
    In their complaint, Plaintiffs assert two claims for relief. In their first claim, Plaintiffs allege that, "y requiring a permit to carry a handgun in public, yet refusing to issue such permits and refusing to allow the possession of any handgun that would be carried in public, Defendants maintain a complete ban on the carrying of handguns in public by almost all individuals."


    Seems like a springboard to revisit the NJ "May Issue" situation.

    Good news in any event.


    Willie

    .
     
  20. splithoof

    splithoof Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,053
    If, after all the appeals have been exhausted and the courts rule in our favor, I can see places like DC and Los Angeles City & County simply refusing to comply, either through endless delay tactics, or an outright "no, we won't, because we feel the ruling is wrong" attitude. In that event, would there be any practical recourse? Who would/could actually MAKE them physically issue any permits? I see outright refusal on some parts.
     
  21. swinokur

    swinokur Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2009
    Messages:
    905
    Location:
    Montgomery County, MD
    Here's the actual decision. It can be appealed to the DC Circuit, but remember they are bound by their previous decision in Heller.
    .
    .
     

    Attached Files:

  22. AlexanderA
    • Contributing Member

    AlexanderA Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3,262
    Location:
    Virginia
    If this stands on appeal (which I doubt will happen), it's going to cause a security headache for the folks trying to guard the federal government activities and installations within the District. They're probably going to respond by declaring the "federal enclave" (the core area including the White House, the Capitol, the Mall, and all the surrounding government buildings and connecting streets) a gun-free zone, the same as a military base. In the meantime, the District government will enact a stringent licensing scheme that is, in effect, "may issue" verging on "no issue." And Congress will go along with this (regardless of its political makeup), because the Congresspeople value their personal security more than they do the pro-gun rhetoric that they spout for the benefit of their constituents back home. Call me cynical.
     
  23. Drail

    Drail Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,378
    It will be fought with much kicking and screaming and gnashing of teeth. Just like Chicago. I've always felt that if they truly believe that guns are so horrible and dangerous and evil then they should ban them all - from the police and the Secret Service and the military as well. No guns for anyone. They're just too dangerous to our society. Think of the children. It's not over yet. I would personally like to see the whole issue of requiring a "license" or "tax" or "fee" to exercise a Constitutional right addressed by the Courts.
     
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2014
  24. T2K

    T2K Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    144
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Someone is likely to test this and will probably be instantly arrested and charged with a mountain of felonies which will take years and piles of money to litigate. So goes the USA in the 21st century.
     
  25. F-111 John

    F-111 John Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    981
    Location:
    Holt, MI
    No, but I think the court and the plantiff's plea for summary judgement missed something. The court enjoined the District from enforcing D.C. Code § 7-2502.02(a)(4) and D.C. Code § 22-4504(a), but failed to include D.C Code § 7-2506.01(a)(3) in its order.

    Am I mistaken?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page