did Rudy do a flip flop?

Status
Not open for further replies.

SSN Vet

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
6,507
Location
The Dark Side of the Moon
It's a step in the right direction....but I don't know if I trust him.

http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Sep26/0,4670,GiulianiAPInterview,00.html

NEW YORK — Rudy Giuliani, who sued firearms manufacturers and called for tough gun control as New York's mayor, said Tuesday the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and a recent court ruling framed his current defense of a right to own guns.

"You have to look at all of these issues in light of the different concerns that now exist, which is terrorism, the terrorists' war on us," the Republican presidential contender told The Associated Press in an interview. He also mentioned immigration and border security.

He said his thinking on gun rights also was influenced by a federal appeals court decision that overturned a 30-year-old ban on private ownership of handguns in Washington on the grounds that the Constitution gives individual citizens the right to own guns.

"It is a very, very strong description of how important personal liberties are in this country and how we have to respect them," he said of the ruling, adding it "sort of maybe even did more to crystalize my thinking on the whole gun issue in light of Sept. 11."

"I think, after Sept. 11 _ I mean I probably would have had the same impression before, I'm not sure _ but after Sept. 11, all that seemed much more powerful to me," Giuliani said.

His embrace of gun rights appears to have occurred more recently than the months after the 2001 attacks. He was quoted in 2002 and 2004 _ years later _ staunchly supporting gun control.

In a 20-minute interview in a conference room at his Times Square office, Giuliani explained his thinking on the Second Amendment five days after he sought to reassure the National Rifle Association of his support for gun rights, telling the group Friday in Washington that the 2001 attacks highlighted the need for them. Before the same group, Giuliani's rivals, Fred Thompson and John McCain, tried to exploit Giuliani's past support for strict gun control measures.

As mayor, Giuliani sued gun makers and distributors, backed a federal assault weapons ban and once described the NRA as extremist. As a candidate for the GOP nomination, he is struggling to square that record with his need to win over a Republican base made up of conservatives who fiercely defend _ and in some cases base their votes on _ the Second Amendment.

He no longer argues, as gun control advocates do, that the right to bear arms applies only to the rights of states to maintain citizen militias. He now says that right also applies to individuals as well, and he cites the court ruling, Parker v. District of Columbia, that said the Second Amendment gives citizens the right to own handguns.

In the 1990s, he lobbied Congress to ban assault weapons. Now, aides have said it's not clear he would support such a ban.

Giuliani also went from suing the gun industry in 2000 to telling the NRA on Friday that he dislikes the unintended consequences of that lawsuit, which still is working its way through the courts.

In the interview, Giuliani said, "The case took a lot of twists and turns in the direction of trying to get a lot of information about the tracing of guns that would be used for private lawsuits" instead of solely for law enforcement purposes.

"I didn't anticipate that when I brought the case," he said.

The ex-mayor spoke as the campaign of Democratic rival Chris Dodd and the International Association of Fire Fighters castigated him over a supporter's fundraiser seeking $9.11 from attendees. The critics argued the event exploits the terrorist attacks for political purposes. Giuliani aides called the $9.11 idea "an unfortunate choice" that was done without the campaign's knowledge.

On other issues in the interview, Giuliani:

_Backed President Bush's veto threat of a bill in the Democratic-led Congress that would renew and expand a health insurance program that provides coverage for 6 million children. The bill would boost spending by $35 billion to cover 4 million more children.

"It's a not-so-hidden step toward socialized medicine," Giuliani said. "This is one where the Democrats are playing on emotions, but the reality of it is, it will be very, very dangerous to move children from the more desirable form of coverage, private, to the less desirable form of coverage, which is government."

_Refused to rule out raising taxes to offset a Social Security shortfall. He said he would assemble a bipartisan group to develop ideas for fixing Social Security, perhaps even before his inauguration.

"I am opposed to tax increases, but I would look at whatever proposal they came up with and try to figure out how we can come up with a bipartisan way to do it," Giuliani said, adding that potential solutions must come from both parties. "The reality is, I'm more concerned about Medicare and Medicaid than I am with Social Security, because I'm pretty sure we can solve Social Security."

_Argued that he is the only Republican candidate who can ensure the party competes in Democratic-leaning states, such as California and New York.

"I think political professionals would tell you that if my opponents get the nomination, a day after the convention, no matter what they say, the Republican Party operation closes down in 20 states, and then we concentrate on the remaining states," Giuliani said. "I think they would tell you that if I get the nomination, there'll be a Republican Party operation in virtually every state, and then as the campaign goes on, we'll assess where we are."
 
He's saying what he thinks will get him elected.

I would bet the farm that if elected he would sign every piece of anti gun legislation the Democrats send to him.

Between him being anti-gun and his backing the illegal aliens I don't know why he just doesn't call himself the Democrat that he is.
 
I'd prefer a candidate who is pro-RKBA all the way, was born that way, and has never changed his mind for a moment. The ability to bust eggs at 100 yards offhand would be a plus.

However, since this is the real world and full of imperfect choices, I'll take a candidate who panders to pro-RKBA folks over one who panders to the Brady Bunch types any day.

Do I trust a politician? No way.

Will I let the perfect be the enemy of the good, if I have to make a decision between two candidates, neither of whom would be my first choice? I hope not.

I hope Rudy won't be the GOP nominee. I will do my part to help that come to pass.

But if he is, and the other candidate is outspokenly anti-RKBA, I don't plan to take the loser's way out and vote for a third party. Doing that says, "I want to make sure that neither I nor my beliefs have any influence in politics."

Consider this: his judges will be likely to side with an originalist interpretation of the 2nd Amendment. A Democrat's judges, due to their overall legal philosophy, is likely to side with the "let's just make it up" collective-rights crowd.

JUDGES MATTER. If you don't realize that, check your strategy, because it's a failing strategy.

Politics are no place for the unthinkingly emotional. At least, the politics that involve actually winning a battle now and then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top