Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Difference in Weight: Fully Loaded Glock 19 vs. 1911?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by tackleberi, Apr 8, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. tackleberi

    tackleberi Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Messages:
    182
    Since I don't have a postal-type scale, I figured I'd ask and see if someone else had answered this inquiry for themselves....

    How much does a fully-loaded Glock compact weigh (Glock 19, 23, or 32), and how much does a fully-loaded (7+1) carbon-steel (not stainless) 1911 government model weigh?

    While I might need to go out and buy a scale, I'm hoping someone out there had a Glock, a 1911, a scale, and some time to kill.
     
  2. schadenfreude

    schadenfreude Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Messages:
    265
    Location:
    Orygun
    Found a page that says the glock 19 is 29.98 ounces and a full size 1911 is around 44....
     
  3. Spartacus451

    Spartacus451 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    612
    Location:
    MA
    A carbon steel Govt. model with a polymer mainspring housing and GI guide rod is about 38 ounces.

    Someone went and actually measured this in a thread on this forum not so long ago.

    He found that the Glock 17 with ammo was lighter then a 1911 but a Glock 17 with two spare mags was about the same weight as a 1911 with two spare mags. Still apples to oranges but interesting to think about.
     
  4. Shooters Plus

    Shooters Plus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    122
    Location:
    MS
    I actually had a Glock 19, Kimber Custom II and a scale right beside me when I read this, so here you go. :)

    Glock 19 (stock) w/16 rounds of 124gn - 30.8 oz.
    Kimber Custom II w/8 rounds of 230gn - 44.7 oz.

    And for comparison,
    Glock 21 (stock) w/14 rounds of 230gn - 40.1 oz.

    Zack Phillips
    Shooters Plus
     
  5. tackleberi

    tackleberi Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Messages:
    182
    Exactly what I was looking for; although the Glock is lighter, the twice as many rounds of 9mm add up quick, shrinking the difference in weight between the two from significant to not so much.

    Thanks.
     
  6. Gordon Fink

    Gordon Fink Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,322
    Location:
    California
    A good belt will neutralize much of the weight problem.

    ~G. Fink
     
  7. alaskagunner

    alaskagunner Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2007
    Messages:
    21
    The 1911 does weigh a little more , but it is a better gun in every other way. No one would ever or has ever disputed that. ;)
     
  8. Steve C

    Steve C Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,673
    True but every extra oz seems to turn into a lb as the day wears on.
     
  9. Mad Magyar

    Mad Magyar Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,967
    Location:
    Arizona
    +1 :)
     
  10. Black Majik

    Black Majik Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    5,031
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    Interesting results. Anyone able to compare a HK P2000 to a fullsize 1911 with 8+1?
     
  11. easyg

    easyg Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,867
    Location:
    off-line mostly.
    I'll dispute it.
    As much as I like the old 1911, it is not without its faults....

    Less magazine capacity, needlessly redundant safeties (a manual safety and a grip-safety), not as easy to field-strip or detail strip, requires more lubrication to function reliably, and the stock govenment issued 1911 sights are not that great either.

    The best thing going for the 1911 is its single-action trigger.
     
  12. MTS840

    MTS840 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2005
    Messages:
    69
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Yeah, I dispute it too. I'm not a fan. After owning two 1911s, I'll take a good modern design for concealed carry anyday. They are generally lighter in weight, have higher magazine capacity, better out-of-the-box reliability, rugged dependability and better than adequate accuracy. For practicality, you can't beat the good modern designs. And to me, that's all that matters in self defense weapons.
     
  13. Ske1etor

    Ske1etor Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    618
    Location:
    Marrero, Louisiana
    The redundant safeties comment is kinda strange to me. The grip safety is already disengaged when you get a grip on the firearm. Redundant would be if you had to drop a thumb safety on the firearm and then disengage a cross block style safety.

    Also, the thumb safety and grip safety accomplish two separate tasks. The Grip safety (When disengaged) has a bar that rests on the rear of the trigger bar stopping any rearward movement.

    The thumb safety (When engaged) blocks sear movement and keeps the slide in battery.

    It could be considered redundant if both safeties stopped the operation of the same part but they don't. It is simply two separate safeties, each one blocking the movement of one of the two most important ignition parts.
     
  14. alaskagunner

    alaskagunner Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2007
    Messages:
    21
    You missed the smiley face with the wink, Guys!

    Sorry, my sarcasm and a wink in my first post could be construed as highjacking this thread. Looking back I really didn't add anything to the original question. I can't even edit the bold print on the top of this post. I'll try to more high road next time.

    Take care.
     
    Last edited: Apr 8, 2008
  15. Cliff123

    Cliff123 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    Messages:
    9
    14 oz . . . almost one pound!

    Put is this way . . . the Kimber weighs 50% more.

    Some folks don't have a problem with this. Others not so. My brother traded his XD 45 compact because it was to heavy. He now carries a G26.
     
  16. TheLastBoyScout

    TheLastBoyScout Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    710
    Location:
    SE PA/ El Cid (SC)
    I have an XD-45 and a 1911. With full mags in each, there's basically no difference in weight.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page