Disappointment in the new RCBS Rock Chucker Supreme Reloading Kit

Status
Not open for further replies.

slowr1der

Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
1,182
Let me start off by saying that I bought a RCBS Supreme Master reloading kit about 8 years ago and while I've added to it over the years, I still use the majority of the items that came in the kit. I've been pretty happy with it.

Fast forward to now and we wanted to get a good family friend a reloading setup. I looked for a few months trying to piece things together, but just didn't see any deals. Right before Christmas Cabelas put this kit on sale and after the $100 rebate it was significantly cheaper than buying individual items, so we got it for him.

He got around to getting the press mounted, so last night I went over to give him a basic lesson on how to reload and make sure he knew how to use each piece. This is where I started getting disappointed. The Rock Chucker press still seemed to be similar quality to my old setup, but the rest of the kit has gone down hill significantly. The reloading manual is the same Nosler manual that you can get for free on their website. While it has load data for Nosler bullets, it just gives you the max case length, max OAL, etc. It doesn't give you a recommended trim length or OAL, or anything else that might give you a starting point there, just the max. This would probably be fine for someone like myself, but as a new reloader that has no idea what he is doing, it just left my friend confused.

After resizing some brass we get out the hand primer. At first glance it looks identical to mine until I go to pull the priming rod out to insert a shell holder. It doesn't come out. Upon closer inspection you have to release the handle all of the way and slide the priming rod and the spring on it out of the bottom of the handle since it is now all made as one piece. To put it back together the instructions say to get a screwdriver out and push the rod up while trying to get the rod on the handle to line up correctly. This is a huge pain, especially to have to do everytime you need to change shell holders. My old priming tool will come apart in this manner but it said specifically in the manual not to take it apart like this as it's very difficult to put back together. So on mine the priming rod is 2 pieces and you can just pull it out of the top. Why they would make it so you have to disassemble the whole tool in a way they previously said not to do, just to change shell holders is beyond me. This is a horrible design. My friend really struggled getting it back together and I had to step in to help.

Next we get to the scale. I'm sure the scale is accurate, but it's confusing to use. On my old 505 you set the grains with the big adjustment and then set it to the 10th of a grain with the small adjustment. There is also a line that you line the beam up with when it's zeroed or on the correct charge. Very easy to use and works well.

Well, not the case with this new scale. It has been replace with the M500. With this scale the big adjustment each line is 5 grains and then you set between 1 and 5 grains to the 10th of a grain with the small adjustment. This really isn't an issue, it's just much easier for a newbie to be one mark off on the big adjustment and be a significant amount off. There is no room for error here. On the other end of the scale where you line the beam up with the zero mark, instead of having a mark, it's just three metal prongs that come to a point and you want it lined up with the center one. Not an issue either, but just much less defined than the old model leaving my new friend to question which of the three points the scale was supposed to be lined up with until he got the manual out. It's also pretty obvious that this scale is made significantly cheaper than the old model just holding it in your hand.

The rest of the kit seems to work well however. The press is still the same old great Rock Chucker people having been using for years, the uniflow powder thrower is similar, as is the included lube pad. They did change the chamfer and debur tool and made it significantly larger. This may actually be a benefit. So the whole kit isn't bad, however the hand primer is horrible, the book included is lousy and available for free online, and the scale while not horrible is a bit disappointing.

Has anyone else used these kits and had similar experiences? I guess I was just a bit shocked after seeing how much better things were in my old kit.
 
I have and agree with you , If you read the box it now says "MADE IN CHINA" most of RCBS stuff is now imported. RCBS has become an investor driven /
stock market company the old RCBS is not the same as today's RCBS in my opinion.
When I called RCBS years ago someone answered the phone saying RCBS how can I help you , NOW when I call a few months ago phone was answered
thanks for calling Vista how may I direct your call so after they screened my call and questions, then they said please hold for an RCBS rep to help you !!
took 45 min between Vista and holding to talk with a RCBS person !!
So yes you are correct things have changed with them as they are a stock / investor owned and represented by Vista now.
I do own some of their dies and and older scale plus the rocker supreme but it seems that they are not as popular as they once were with new shooters
 
Same story here. Love the press, but I've replaced all the misc bits with parts that actually work from other companies. Would not buy again.
 
The priming tool was definitely a pain at first, and still kind of is, but after a few times taking it apart and putting it back together to switch out the shell holder, it's not too bad. The scale... Meh. I would appreciate a bit more beef to it, but the biggest load it's ever going to hold is maybe 100 grains? I see your point though. Still the same great press! No issues there.
 
I recently got their universal hand primer and like it a lot. Don't have much else just misc trays and a couple die sets. All have been great.
 
A friend of mine has the new RCBS kit being discussed here. The press and the uniflow are the same as the older version that I have. The hand primer is the same that you get it you buy a new stand alone RCBS hand primer. So if you don't like that particular primer tool buy something else. I personally hate hand primer tools and the included attachment for the Rock chucker press so I opened up my wallet and got something I like better But it wasn't because the tools in the kit don't work.

The differences are in, as mentioned, the manual and the scale. Mine came with the Speer 14th edition now they came with the Nosler. As far as the "how to" instructions of handloading there really isn't much difference. The Speer manual features Speer bullets and the Nosler features Nosler bullets. I really not understand the handwringing with respect to which manual comes with the kit as with either one you will need to get in some way additional data. I doubt that any data manual has data that is totally unique. If you want to be a well rounded handloader you will need several manuals and high on that list of should have books are both the Speer and Nosler manuals. As far as getting the data in the webs for free the same can be said of the Hodgdon data on their website. Except the Hodgdon Annual is a cost item and has a lot more information than the free stuff at their website

A comparison between the M500 scale and the 5-0-5. They both have their good points and their bad points. The 505 is maybe a little easier to operate, the M500 is easier to read. I have experimented with both scales using check weights and sitting on a guaranteed flat/level surface and both are equally accurate. I personally like the 505 better than the M500 but given that the function of the scale is to accurately weigh powder both are very capable. If I were to say on this forum that the reason I will never own a Lee Perfect Powder Measure is because I think it looks funny and cheap (which it does), I would get piled on by the Lovers of all things Lee for being a tool snob.

If you look you can get a really good deal on the RC kit. Yesterday I went to the mailbox and in it was a small box which contained the plastic powder hopper for my uniflow. I broke mine which is 7 years old. No cost for anything, shipping free, service fast. So if you have a hand primer that doesn't work contact RCBS and they will fix or replace for free. I admit that I like the styling of the 505 scale better than the M500 but I will take a M500 way before I settle for a Lee safety scale which is like a toy in my opinion.
 
I thought the powder hopper on the rcbs uniflow was glued in? How did you replace it?
 
. If I were to say on this forum that the reason I will never own a Lee Perfect Powder Measure is because I think it looks funny and cheap (which it does), I would get piled on by the Lovers of all things Lee for being a tool snob.

Then why did you even bring it up, this statement is not related to the article at all so why mention it
 
"Kits" in general just aren't worth it. They use the components that they manufacture and the cheapest ones too. I like to use different components from different makers. No outfit makes the best of all components. This doesn't just apply to reloading. Cabela's sells a "kit" with muzzleloaders too and most of the components are junk.
 
I just bought the M500 scale and I am also disappointed. I was expecting something heavy-feeling with smooth moving parts. Instead, it feels like it was stamped out of tin foil and rattles a lot. It is also extremely easy to knock over and moves around when adjusting the beam due to the light weight.

Can I hot glue some copper plated bullets inside the base to add stability, or will it affect the scale?
 
Then why did you even bring it up, this statement is not related to the article at all so why mention it

Are you asking a question or making a statement?

Assuming that you are asking a question I tried to draw a parallel between how some handle criticism of certain makers of stuff. I have often thought I wouldn't put a certain powder measure on my bench because for me this is a hobby/pastime and isn't a revenue stream. Since it is a hobby and I want to enjoy my hobbies that means that I want to have decent, better than entry level stuff. I'm not looking at a bottom line and trying to make payments to vendors that if I miss they will shut down my business. So call if whatever, a personality flaw or simply personal standards, I want my bench to look professional. It doesn't look professional with plastic all over the place--my opinion.

Back to the subject:

The Nosler manual, and I know because I have 2 editions of it, is a typical handloading manual. Finding fault with it, while the prerogative of us all, is no different than finding fault with the Lee Perfect Powder Measure. In both cases they perform the assigned task. To make the statement that I made, that the Lee PPM looks funny and cheap and that is a reason to forgo purchase of it is similar to saying the Nosler Manual isn't as nice as the Speer because of what the manual leaves out. As far as the actual load data is concerned they are both typical manuals, simple as that. As far as the sections on how to handload are concerned they are basically the same. The truth of the matter is neither the Speer or the Nosler manuals are what I consider my go to manuals for general handloading and between the two manuals I have 5 editions total on my bookshelf. Some Lee kits come with Lee manuals, I have 2 editions of that manual and don't use them much either. Some of the load data I use as a cross check and while not a good instructional manual (some of the narrative is nauseating) I still think handloaders should have a copy (Lee).

But again, it is possible to find a good deal on the subject of this thread. And while it has it's flaws it is way better than some other offerings. It's not professional grade but I wouldn't classify it entry level. But the thing I want to make clear is I don't personally recommend anything (products) to anyone. There are plenty of other posters willing to perform that service so my input really isn't necessary.
 
.........

Can I hot glue some copper plated bullets inside the base to add stability, or will it affect the scale?

Yes you can. I filled the inside of my 5-0-5 scale with plaster for the same reason. Check youtube, there are numerous other things you can do to the scale to make if bulletproof. The main thing is any scale has to be placed on a solid level surface and when zeroing the scale the beam should be parallel or level. For that you might have to put something like lead shot into the pan base then zero the beam.
 
I mix some epoxy up and stir in lead shot then scoop it in the hollows underneath and pack it in. That will keep your scale in place.:) You could use old bullets, scrap lead, or whatever heavy stuff you have around but shot was easier to level off and make look good for me. FWIW I did that to my RCBS 10-10 just because. Also good thing to do to your powder trickler as well
 
I cut a piece of 1/4” balsa to fit snug into the bottom of my 505 and then filled with #4 lead shot. I was going to use plaster but wanted to be able to get to the magnets if there was ever an issue. That scale is rock solid and doesn’t move. A friend did the same to his new RCBS 500 and it is worlds better.
I also have a piece of 1/2” glass that my scales sit on.
 
Are you asking a question or making a statement?

Assuming that you are asking a question I tried to draw a parallel between how some handle criticism of certain makers of stuff. I have often thought I wouldn't put a certain powder measure on my bench because for me this is a hobby/pastime and isn't a revenue stream. Since it is a hobby and I want to enjoy my hobbies that means that I want to have decent, better than entry level stuff. I'm not looking at a bottom line and trying to make payments to vendors that if I miss they will shut down my business. So call if whatever, a personality flaw or simply personal standards, I want my bench to look professional. It doesn't look professional with plastic all over the place--my opinion.

Back to the subject:

The Nosler manual, and I know because I have 2 editions of it, is a typical handloading manual. Finding fault with it, while the prerogative of us all, is no different than finding fault with the Lee Perfect Powder Measure. In both cases they perform the assigned task. To make the statement that I made, that the Lee PPM looks funny and cheap and that is a reason to forgo purchase of it is similar to saying the Nosler Manual isn't as nice as the Speer because of what the manual leaves out. As far as the actual load data is concerned they are both typical manuals, simple as that. As far as the sections on how to handload are concerned they are basically the same. The truth of the matter is neither the Speer or the Nosler manuals are what I consider my go to manuals for general handloading and between the two manuals I have 5 editions total on my bookshelf. Some Lee kits come with Lee manuals, I have 2 editions of that manual and don't use them much either. Some of the load data I use as a cross check and while not a good instructional manual (some of the narrative is nauseating) I still think handloaders should have a copy (Lee).

But again, it is possible to find a good deal on the subject of this thread. And while it has it's flaws it is way better than some other offerings. It's not professional grade but I wouldn't classify it entry level. But the thing I want to make clear is I don't personally recommend anything (products) to anyone. There are plenty of other posters willing to perform that service so my input really isn't necessary.


Like I said your comment was/is completely irrelevant to the subject and not even related to your own comments, not one person mentioned and commented on Lee products until you brought it up. You actually had a very good insightful post up until you decided to interject with a blatantly and obvious subversive bias towards Lee for no other reason than to (and I'm quoting you now) "get piled on by the Lovers of all things Lee for being a tool snob." which tells me this was intentional and completely unnecessary.
 
The most expensive part of the kit was great, plus the powder measure. So the big items are good. The scale is livable. I would sell the other items and get things that you like. I love my RCBS universal priming tool. It is sweet. There is always the internet for OAL, and there are other reloading manuals to be had, plus free data on the internet. To get a good price on a kit, something has to give somewhere else.
 
The most expensive part of the kit was great, plus the powder measure. So the big items are good. The scale is livable. I would sell the other items and get things that you like. I love my RCBS universal priming tool. It is sweet. There is always the internet for OAL, and there are other reloading manuals to be had, plus free data on the internet. To get a good price on a kit, something has to give somewhere else.


"To get a good price on a kit, something has to give somewhere else."

Once the potential buyer understands why they have lower priced kits they are apt to make better decisions. It is about marketing that is done to help the companies, not the consumer. It seems fundamental to me that one should speak to an experienced reloader prior to investment in equipment. And, to be sure, one that is not locked in on brand loyalty to the exclusion of critical thinking.
 
Like I said your comment was/is completely irrelevant to the subject and not even related to your own comments, not one person mentioned and commented on Lee products until you brought it up. You actually had a very good insightful post up until you decided to interject with a blatantly and obvious subversive bias towards Lee for no other reason than to (and I'm quoting you now) "get piled on by the Lovers of all things Lee for being a tool snob." which tells me this was intentional and completely unnecessary.

Have a fantastic day!
 
I wouldn't disparage a low priced kit that gets the more expensive items right. It allows someone to start until they get to the point they can afford better. There is always the secondary market for the things we want to replace. Check out the used prices for reloading equipment on ebay. Stuff can hold its value pretty good.
 
OP, I've been using that same kit for the last 3 years. It's what I learned to reload on. I don't find the M500 scale difficult to use nor do I find the hand primer difficult to take apart and put back together. The Nosler reloading manual leaves a lot to be desired but everyone knows you should have several reloading manuals available to use for reference.

Perhaps you were running into the classic 'old dog new tricks' issue.
 
Perhaps you were running into the classic 'old dog new tricks' issue.
Did you read the OP's post at all ? He said he bought His RCBS kit 8 years ago "five years before you" the OP said he is happy with that kit
BUT he bought a new kit this Christmas for someone and has noticed a decline in quality between the older RCBS to the newer RCBS kit,
how is this teaching an old dog a new trick ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top