Loosedhorse
member
Well, after sitting on the .410 revolver sidelines for a while (perhaps mostly because no such revolvers were available in MA until very recently), I have drunk the Kool-Aid. More like swimming in it.
I've heard that it is clunky. Thirty oz, 8 1/2 inches overall--smaller and lighter than a 4-inch .38 K-frame. I've hear it is a joke as a SD gun. With 24 000-buck pellets @ 800fps in a cylinder, or with quickly reloadable .45 ACP 230 gr JHPs. I've heard it would be stupid as a camping gun, despite #7 1/2 shot loads for snake, and 255 gr/900fps .45C for larger animals.
Not bad. Not perfect perhaps, but not bad.
Temptations: it should be possible to fire .460 Rowland and .45 Colt +P rounds from this gun. I'm sure Smith would say no.
Problems: I don't understand why they didn't put in their usual "blast shield" above the cylinder gap, as they do for their other scandium alloy frames. And the bantam rubber grip is ridiculous: the backstrap should be covered with rubber to help with .410 recoil. (The ones with a CT laser grip DO have a covered backstrap.)
I don't see this as a preferable CCW gun--but for me all revolvers bigger than J-frames are handicapped as CCWs. As a HD gun, it suffers from comparison with a long gun (as all handguns do). But as a hiking gun, its versatility and compactness/light weight is appealing--a handgun version of the Wild West Guns Co-Pilot.
Of course, it is ugly. But for someone used to drinking Glock Kool-Aid, ugliness is possibly a sign of...
Perfection?
I've heard that it is clunky. Thirty oz, 8 1/2 inches overall--smaller and lighter than a 4-inch .38 K-frame. I've hear it is a joke as a SD gun. With 24 000-buck pellets @ 800fps in a cylinder, or with quickly reloadable .45 ACP 230 gr JHPs. I've heard it would be stupid as a camping gun, despite #7 1/2 shot loads for snake, and 255 gr/900fps .45C for larger animals.
Not bad. Not perfect perhaps, but not bad.
Temptations: it should be possible to fire .460 Rowland and .45 Colt +P rounds from this gun. I'm sure Smith would say no.
Problems: I don't understand why they didn't put in their usual "blast shield" above the cylinder gap, as they do for their other scandium alloy frames. And the bantam rubber grip is ridiculous: the backstrap should be covered with rubber to help with .410 recoil. (The ones with a CT laser grip DO have a covered backstrap.)
I don't see this as a preferable CCW gun--but for me all revolvers bigger than J-frames are handicapped as CCWs. As a HD gun, it suffers from comparison with a long gun (as all handguns do). But as a hiking gun, its versatility and compactness/light weight is appealing--a handgun version of the Wild West Guns Co-Pilot.
Of course, it is ugly. But for someone used to drinking Glock Kool-Aid, ugliness is possibly a sign of...
Perfection?