Durability of light weight frames

[Rodgerp]

I'm thinking of getting an alloy framed revolver to cut down on weight.
If I stay with standard pressure loads how well do these generally hold up?

I realize I will increase my felt recoil.

My local shop has a barely used S&W 37 (no lock) and the usual assortment of new Taurus 85 UL's.

BTW, I can get the Smith for about the same money as a new Taurus.


Thanks,

Rodger

 

[TAC]

All the newer light weight revolvers hold up very well. The Scandium alloy guns are lighter, and stronger than aluminum alloy and can handle .357 magnum loads due to their cylinders being made of Titanium, or Stainless steel. Many people can not handle the recoil of .357 in a J frame, and end up carrying .38 Spl. If that is your intention, you can save $200-$300.00 getting an aluminum frame .38 Spl. to begin with. Others, myself included, feel the .357 J frames are a good investment in the long haul, as they will hold up better over the years, especially when using .38 Spl, but at an additional cost.

I've owned several over the years, never had a problem. My latest is S&W's 340 M&P, with a night sight.

 

[Ala Dan]

Smith & Wesson Airweight J-frames have been around for many, many
moons; and I don't personally know of anyone that has worn one out~!