Every gun owner should watch this video

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
106
http://www.kccn.tv/

Sheriff's deputies' disdain for Constitution captured by their own recorded comments

By DANIEL BLACKBURN
When San Luis Obispo County Sheriff’s Deputy Darren Murphy responded to a “shots fired” call in April 2008, he decided en route that he was going to make an arrest.

He did far more than that. Murphy and other deputies made an unwarranted entry into a home, and then into a locked gun safe. Murphy's uncensored, darkly disturbing observations and behavior following his Code-3 arrival at the rural home of longtime SLO County resident Matt Hart were picked up by Murphy's and other deputies’ own recorders. Those recordings provide a rare, frighteningly revealing, behind-the-scenes perspective of how one local law enforcement agency views the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and other laws its personnel are sworn to uphold.

Sheriff’s spinner Rob Bryn declined to confirm the identities of any of the deputies appearing or heard in the recordings, or to discuss any aspect of the Hart home invasion. So we've done that for you. (Bryn, ever the public servant, eventually stopped responding to e-mails from a KCCN.tv reporter.)

Deputies’ deportment in the field as exhibited by their own words, as well as their plainly audible efforts to fabricate justifications for their actions, are lamentable. Local county prosecutors’ subsequent abuse of power, wielded in a cavalier, clumsy, and transparent effort to avoid a lawsuit, also is troubling.

But in the larger scheme of things, it is the systematic dismantling of the Fourth Amendment by over-zealous cops and an enabling judiciary that should be a cause of concern for every American citizen. Incredibly, Hart's case may be less of an anomaly than it appears.

The question is: Should law enforcement officers like Deputy Darren Murphy be allowed to make day-to-day, life-changing decisions regarding the fate of law-abiding citizens?

Watch. Listen. And then you be the judge.
 
Bet Matt Hart is planning his retirement.
He's got a slam dunk civil rights case.

The officers involved are done with careers in law enforcement.

Keep us informed. I'm betting big settlement really fast.

AFS
 
Now that the media got hold of this, he will be ok. Hopefully get some cash along with his guns. That misdemeanor has to be expunged though, I'm sure there are a lot of Lawyers who would love to help him.
 
from Sharpshooter74 (post 2) :
This can happen to anyone.. This man can't get his guns back.

from Tim the student (post 4) :
Thought he already did get most back? In the link you provided, it was said that the Sheriff's still hold 4. I'd think that if they had all, they would have specified that.
Huh?!? :banghead:

The man didn't get 4 guns back! I don't understand what you're getting at. If he didn't get just ONE of his guns back, Sharpshooter would still be correct. What the LEOs did was unconstitutional, illegal and unbelievable. The guy should have gotten ALL of his guns back from the top-dog LEO (Sheriff/Chief) along with a public apology and all charges dropped. Period! End of discussion!
 
I feel sick.:(

New Orleans just got a new police chief and he is weeding out the bad leo's.

The NOPD is under several federal investigations for some over the top stuff.

The next step in car audio should be security cameras for traffic stops.
Home entertainment should have video cameras incorporated.:uhoh:
 
The man didn't get 4 guns back!

I never said he did. Why do you think I did? Where is the confusion coming from? All I said was that the video said that the cops still had four, and that I thought that he had more than four initially taken from him.

I don't understand what you're getting at

I'm getting that it looks like he has gotten some guns back, and will eventually get the rest back, which sucks, is horrible, should never have happened, etc etc, but a far cry from "can't get his guns back".

The guy should have gotten ALL of his guns back from the top-dog LEO (Sheriff/Chief) along with a public apology and all charges dropped. Period! End of discussion!

Yeah- but he didn't. Your anger is misplaced with me. I agree that it should never have happened, and that he should be issued an apology, and to have some form of compensation.

Feel free to read what I wrote, and not read so much into things. Have a happy day.
 
Talk about some rotten cops... One more reason not to live in Cali.

I feel sorry for the guy. I do what he did almost every day in my own front yard. I like to think that something like that could never happen around here, but you never know with constitution shredding LEOs and judges.

I hope he gets a great lawyer and sues the county for everything they are worth, including the cops jobs and pensions. He needs to contact the NRA if he hasn't yet.

It makes me want to :barf:
 
So, was it legal for him to be shooting where he was?
It says he was on his own property, but didn't say what this state/county rules were, or how far he was from the neighbors.
 
That sheriff's department has money for high tech video and audio, but apparently lacks funds to keep their officers educated in constututional law. I wonder where the the money is better spent. Without the well documented tapes of the officers' actions, we'd be without a clue as to what REALLY happened. THANK GOD they didn't doctor or destroy the tapes.
 
PS: I think his biggest problem will be four guns that offend the senses (and sometimes restrictive gun laws) in California. He had an M1A, mini-14, and some others that might have been no-no's in CA, possibly not registered when they were required to be by CA law? (Speculation)
 
No surprise there. Question is, who vets the cop's claims before they are taken for gospel truth? Bad apples in the force as in every sector of society. The sad part is they have the power to ruin people's lives. :barf:
 
PS: I think his biggest problem will be four guns that offend the senses (and sometimes restrictive gun laws) in California. He had an M1A, mini-14, and some others that might have been no-no's in CA, possibly not registered when they were required to be by CA law? (Speculation)
But this was found out through an illegal search so these guns could be suppressed.
 
Curiously enough, some of the 4 guns he has yet to get back, are guns the officers are heard commenting on how they "liked" them............

Wanna hazard a guess where those guns probably are now?

This whole thing is a disgrace to that department, every officer that entered that home should be fired.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top