Facebook Purges Pro-Gun Accounts

Status
Not open for further replies.

44Brent

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
398
Location
Illinois
Massive act of censorship sees alternative media pages disappeared

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
December 27, 2012
Facebook is purging accounts that carry pro-second amendment and pro-liberty information in a censorship purge that has accelerated over the past few hours, with innumerable pages being disappeared merely for posting legitimate political content.

NaturalNews.com’s Mike Adams contacted us to alert us to the fact that “Facebook banned our account for posting this,” with an attached image of a Gandhi quote about how the British disarmed the citizenry during their rule in India.

271212image.jpg

The following is a list of Facebook accounts operated by individuals in the alternative media that have been shut down by Facebook staff over the past 24 hours. Infowars writer Aaron Dykes and political dissident Brandon J. Raub have also had their accounts deleted. Raub was snatched by police and forcibly imprisoned in a psychiatric ward earlier this year for posting political content on Facebook. Infowars editor Kurt Nimmo also had his account suspended this morning.

Kurt Nimmo (account suspended)
Aaron Dykes (account inactive)
Amber Lyon (account suspended)
Brandon J. Raub (account inactive)
Michael F Rivero (account inactive)
Anthony J Hilder (account inactive)
William Lewis (account inactive)
Richard Gage (account inactive)
William Rodriguez (account inactive)
Infowar Artist (account inactive)
We are Change (account inactive)
Wacboston At Twitter (account inactive)
Michael Murphy Tmp (account inactive)
Robert M Bowman (account inactive)
Peter Dale Scott (account inactive)
Jason Infowars (account inactive)
Mike Skuthan (account inactive)
Packy Savvenas (account inactive)
Sean Wright (account inactive)
Katherine Albrect (account inactive)

It is important to stress that most of these accounts have not simply been temporarily suspended, they have been shut down completely. Some are now being reinstated after complaints. Accounts that have been suspended can still be seen but posting rights have been revoked.

A 24 hour suspension was also placed on the Alex Jones Facebook account due to an image that another user had posted in which Alex Jones was tagged.

One of the messages being received by users having their accounts suspended is displayed below. In most cases, users are not even being informed of why their page was suspended or deleted, with Facebook merely referring them to the company’s guidelines.



Last week, we reported on how Facebook was suspending user accounts that questioned the official narrative behind the Sandy Hook school massacre.

As we have previously highlighted, Facebook occasionally deletes images and posts that it claims violate “Facebook’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities,” yet constitute little more than political conjecture or a healthy skepticism of official narratives on current events.

In September 2011, Infowars reporter Darrin McBreen was told by Facebook staff not to voice his political opinion on the social networking website.

Responding to comments McBreen had made about off-grid preppers being treated as criminals, the “Facebook Team” wrote, “Be careful making about making political statements on facebook,” adding, “Facebook is about building relationships not a platform for your political viewpoint. Don’t antagonize your base. Be careful and congnizat (sic) of what you are preaching.”
 
See how easy it is. No need for censorship laws, no need for executive orders, no need for discussion of constitutional rights, no way to get a court to intervene.

Simply a private choice of a private media company to close down discussion that does not conform to their political agenda. Of course, it might well be that their action was "suggested" by "someone", but that doesn't make any difference. No government decisions, no debate, no arguments or recourse.

Same effect, though. Dissent is suppressed. I am sure those nice folks at Facebook have been promised jobs at the concentration camps.

Jim
 
Facebook can do whatever it wants. It's a private entity and a free product.

Someone can go start up a Gunbook if they wanted to. Or just send in mass complaints. That's how small groups get big companies to cave.
 
Step inside private property, certain rights can be legally suspended. When I worked at a major auto manufacturing distributor, they made it very clear my first and second amendment rights were null and void while on the property.
 
Been using mine to support gun rights and to solicit folks to join the NRA. Wonder how long it will take them to shut mine down?
 
The "Cold Dead Hands" page is still up. That's my favorite one anyway.
And the NRA page is up and running with nearly 90k likes. I think if they had a serious anti-gun agenda, that would be the first one they shut down.
 
Facebook can do whatever it wants. It's a private entity and a free product.

Someone can go start up a Gunbook if they wanted to. Or just send in mass complaints. That's how small groups get big companies to cave.
Technically it can't. It can still sell your info even if your Facebook account is banned. Isn't that messed up?
 
Facebook can do whatever it wants. It's a private entity and a free product.

Yes they can, but I have an equal right to have nothing to do with them.

And I don't hesitate to exercise that right. Hopefully others that belive in gun rights will do exactly the same.
 
Technically it can't. It can still sell your info even if your Facebook account is banned. Isn't that messed up?

Terms of Service Agreement. If they were breaking a law, the user-base is large enough that a class action would slap shareholders into paying out big time.
 
While I agree the company has a right to do this, it blows me away.

The line must be drawn here. Either we stand for our rights or roll over.

See signature.
 
I can't help but wonder what other topics of conversation Face book has felt the moral imperative to shut down an account?

Any account that discussed breast-feeding in public as a right was the last one I recall.

Plenty of my friends use facebook to discuss guns and hunting. We even have facebook group pages with hundreds of members where you can buy/sell/trade firearms.

Like most things, facebook is what you make of it.
 
I discuss guns on my Facebook all the time. Guns are present in many of my pictures, including my profle type pic and my big timeline pic. I have Likes on a lot of gun companies and manufacturers and Pro 2A organizations.

And my account has never gone anyway or, as far as I can tell, been bothered in any way
 
I deleted my FB account a few months ago and that pencil necked Mike Zuckerberg can go and eat my shorts.
 
Is there a more reliable site than infowars.com discussing this?

It's pretty hard to take anything from those crackpots seriously.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top