Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Federal Background=Confiscation List

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by InkEd, Jan 16, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. InkEd

    InkEd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    2,575
    Location:
    Parts Unknown
    I see zero benefit of providing the federal government a list of potential firearm owners other than to give them a reference for future confiscation!
     
  2. Nico Testosteros

    Nico Testosteros Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2009
    Messages:
    480
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    Man, you are paranoid.

    You would prefer there be no background checks, I take it ?
    That's a pretty fringe position.
    You'd rather felons be able to walk into any gun store and purchase one?
    I realize guns can be stolen or purchased privately ( at least for now) by criminals but come on.

    You have to be trolling.
     
  3. boatmanschneider

    boatmanschneider Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    Messages:
    106
    Location:
    MICHIGAN
    Non violent felons?

    As in some guy who stole a box of Ipads? Or was caught with too much weed?

    Once a list of owners is in the hands of a government the laws can change.

    What will be a felony next? Hate Speech? Membership of certain organizations?
     
  4. 10mm Mike

    10mm Mike Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Location:
    Central Arkansas
    I don't know about the OP, but I would certainly prefer that there were no background checks.

    That's your opinion. Have any data to back it up?

    Yes. Assuming they were released from prison, rather than escaped, then they have served their time and all rights should be restored in full. If they are that big of a danger, then they should either still be in prison or they should be dead. Simple as that.
     
  5. gym

    gym member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    5,903
    Mike I have to disagree, even though I consider myself to be an advocate of gun rights for everyone.
    Until the day comes when they stop early releases on violent felons who have 30 arrests, "could be any number from 1-100", you can't give certain types of violent individuals guns.
    In interviews done in prison with "hard cases", they openlly said that they would go back to doing what they did before, including violent crimes with guns. Each case has to be decided on it's own merit, and we have had endless conversations here that went on for weeks on this issue.
    There is no bureau that could decide who gets a gun after a violent offender is released form jail. It would cost money that the state and federal government just doesn't have.
    Once you shoot someone during the commision of a crime or kill an ex wife, or anything that shows that you can't control yourself adequately to function in society, then you lose your rights.
    Otherwise we will have shoot outs even more frequentlly than we now have, imagine letting all the guys in IMAX out and giving them AR's. that would be a movie like escape from New York, it would be very bad.
     
  6. sansone

    sansone Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,173
    Location:
    north florida USA
    I can tell you here in FL the background check info automatically deletes from the LE computer after the customer is approved
     
  7. SoCalNoMore

    SoCalNoMore Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    107
    If there were no way for anyone to know if an outside army was in the US and stockpiling arms, I think that would be an issue.

    Think about the law that was created after the OKC bombing for ammonium nitrate.

    I personally dont see how a registration will help, crooks will always have a way to get a weapon if they really want to.
     
  8. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    48,852
    Location:
    Alabama
    This went from registration to background checks. They are not the same thing. Why say someone wants no checks and wants criminals to be able to walk in and buy guns when all they said was they did not want registration. Buying through an FFL and doing the paperwork is not registration. That info is not collected and put in a registration database. The antis want it to be saved to a central data base for registration, but is isn't that way right now.
     
  9. P5 Guy

    P5 Guy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,702
    Location:
    Tampa Bay area
    Ever try to completely delete files from your hard drive? Digital information is pretty much forever and background checks are digital info.
     
  10. USAF_Vet

    USAF_Vet Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    5,773
    Location:
    Hastings, Michigan
    People have been registering firearms with the Feds since 1934. And not just any weapons, 'dangerous' weapons that are fully automatic or have short barrels or large bore diameters.

    How many of those have been confiscated? Don't you think if it were so easy to confiscate weapons, they would start with the NFA registry?
     
  11. mike_charlie

    mike_charlie Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2012
    Messages:
    5
    Not true. Data that is deleted, for the most part, is gone. Persistent data after deletion was more of a problem years ago on lower density magnetic storage media. If you want to be paranoid, go ahead and question whether they actually delete it. If it's deleted, however, it's deleted.

    I realize I'm arguing semantics but the distinction is important.
     
  12. StrutStopper

    StrutStopper Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    633
    P5 Guy, you can scrub your hard drive's empty space to completely erase things with a program like BC-Wipe. Just deleting a file won't cut it. All deleting does is to erase the file name so that portion of the drive can be overwritten.

    Regarding the topic at hand, A FFL who happens to be an officer at one of the sportsmans clubs I belong to said at the last meeting that he got a visit from the feds who proceeded to take pictures of his books. Now that right there tells me they are preparing for potential confiscation... Has anyone else heard of FFLs books being photographed??
     
  13. Clean97GTI

    Clean97GTI Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,377
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    StrutStopper,

    a picture may simply be an easier way to verify the bound books are present, intact and being used than impounding the books for further investigation.
    Hard to say without a more complete picture of what happened. Hearsay twice removed over the interwebs is not all that reliable.
     
  14. freyasman

    freyasman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Messages:
    276
    I'm not sure that background checks on every sale (including private ones) are a bad thing, per se.... I just want to know EXACTLY what gets a person denied. Right now, I know what the standard is.... but what does the Gov't WANT it to be? I remember crazy stories about the "no fly" list, and it makes me wonder.
     
  15. mcdonl

    mcdonl Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    3,228
    Location:
    Southern Maine
    Am I wrong to assume that every gun we have ever purchased through an FFL has a record of it somewhere on some FBI computer?

    They already have their registration.
     
  16. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    Yes, you are wrong.

    The Form 4473 backround check you and the dealer complete makes no mention of the make, model, or serial number of the firearm you are buying.

    The only mention of the firearm in question is three check boxes on the Form 4473 is "Handgun", "Long gun" or "other"

    The only copy of the form you fill out must be kept on file by the FFL dealer you bought the gun from.
    That and the sales receipt is all there is.

    rc
     
  17. mcdonl

    mcdonl Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    3,228
    Location:
    Southern Maine
    Hey... RC... Can you believe it, I was misinformed :)

    Thanks!!
     
  18. c4v3man

    c4v3man Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    244
    Location:
    Reno, NV
    Irregardless of whether or not the form must be filled out to completion (I would assume it would, but you know what they say about assumptions), there absolutely should in no way be a section for Manufacturer, Model, Serial, Type, and Caliber on form 4473 page 3, which there is currently. There is no reason for that field to be on the form... either you're safe to buy a firearm, or you're not.
    http://www.atf.gov/forms/download/atf-f-4473-1.pdf
     
  19. j.kramer

    j.kramer member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2013
    Messages:
    89
    yes i do it everyday

    nothing to it
     
  20. 10mm Mike

    10mm Mike Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Location:
    Central Arkansas
    I agree, but that is more of a discussion about the disfunctional criminal justice system, rather than the 2nd amendment. And as you said, it has been debated at length here before.

    Felon issue aside, the reason I oppose background checks (from FFL's, as well as from individuals) is because it is making you prove your innocence before you can go about exercising your constitutionally protected rights. If you are denied, you are not given a reason why, and then the burden is on you to make the government to get their information straight so you can make a purchase... which is none of their business in the first place.

    If they had a system of voluntary background checks with no cost associated (with no incentive for, or against) that would be different. Then it would be up to the people making the transaction to decide.
     
  21. radiotom

    radiotom Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    332
    When you "delete" a file all that happens is the file is simply marked at the beginning of the data on the hard drive as deleted and the operating system then ignores the file. It is not really deleted until it is overwritten and even then the FBI has equipment that can figure out what was previously there. To REALLY delete a file you would have to overwrite the drive a few times with random bits....or grind the platters to dust.
     
  22. 10mm Mike

    10mm Mike Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Location:
    Central Arkansas
    unless your hard drive is practically full, it would take less than 30 minutes for a 3rd year computer science student to recover that file. The only practical way to remove a single file from a hard drive is for it to be overwritten with other data, which is extremely unlikely to happen unless there is very limited space left on the drive.

    *edited because radiotom beat me to the punch with a better explanation
     
  23. Vector

    Vector Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    675
    Location:
    USA
    What makes you think they wont? Just because it has not happened here yet, doesn't mean it wont. Just look at other countries that went from national registration to confiscation/mandatory turn ins.

    As another poster pointed out, the background check in Florida is not registration, and if I am not mistaken, the info must be purged/destroyed within a certain period of time after the approval goes through.

    That seems more than reasonable to me.
     
  24. Ryanxia

    Ryanxia Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Messages:
    4,451
    Location:
    'MURICA!
    Well said 10mm Mike.
     
  25. freyasman

    freyasman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Messages:
    276
    I have never had any problem passing a background check, but like 10mm Mike said, it is inappropriate to have to PROVE I can. This is the same reason why I don't like being asked for ID by LEO's when they have no "suspicion" that a crime has been commited. Do I have anything to hide? No.... but its a boundary issue.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page