Yeah I've had good luck with Simmons scopes as far as holding zero. Most of my friends have too but I do know one guy that had one fail. Most of the guys I hunt with use them though and seem to have good luck. A few guys use Tasco's and like them while a few others have had nothing but problems with them and prefer Simmons. In reality very few of the people I hunt with have anything more than a $100 scope. Most are Simmons, a few Bushnell Banners, and a few Tasco's.
The one scope that I've heard several of them bash is BSA's. The ones that have tried them have had issues. I figure when guys love their Tasco's or Simmons, and then have issues and hate the BSA's they tried it's probably a good idea to stay away from them. The guys certainly aren't picky since they use other cheap scopes and like them. So I've just never used a BSA. One of them did buy two BSA's at once and both had exactly the same problem and just wouldn't stay zeroed.
While I think you can get a lot better glass in the $200 range if you can only spend $50 or so the experience I've had as well as most friends have been that the Simmons seem decent. I've even thought the Tasco at Walmart was decent for what it cost. You don't get the clarity of the nicer scopes, nor the repeatability of adjustments on some that is. They do seem to work as long as you zero them then leave them zeroed. You can see in your other thread where I compared it to Leupold VX-I's I've used and I prefer the cheaper ones actually. However, there are a lot of great scopes in that same price range that blow both the cheaper Leupolds and the cheaper scopes like Simmons, Tasco, etc out of the water.
I'm just not sure I would put a $2-300 scope on a $100 .22 rifle unless I already had the scope I wasn't using.