Last night I was watching monster quest on one of the cable shows. the episode was called vampire beast and documented attacks on dogs and goats in NC last year.
At least a couple of pit bulls were taken down by whatever it was, apparently without them even having a chance to fight back or make a sound.
At the very end of the show they showed a blurry cell phone photo of what they said was a cougar and implied it may have been a cougar that did the damage, even thought the state biologist said no cougars live in NC anymore.
During the show, several people went out in the woods to try and track the thing down. I saw no evidence whatsoever that any of them were armed in any way. Personally, I am not going out in the woods after a critter that takes down pit bulls without them even able to put up any kind of fight, and not be armed with some serious firepower.
My question is does the lack of firearms indicate they felt the animal was no threat, or that they felt the animal just did not exist and were playing along? or maybe they are just plain stupid.
On a lighter note, they played some animal sounds to some of the witnesses. One of the sounds was a tiger. My little beagle was sleeping on the couch and when she heard the tiger, she got up and started barking and demanded to go outside and confront the tiger she had heard. The other animal sounds did not seem to matter much to her. Just the tiger. I let her out and she did her best to scare off the tiger she had heard on TV.
At least a couple of pit bulls were taken down by whatever it was, apparently without them even having a chance to fight back or make a sound.
At the very end of the show they showed a blurry cell phone photo of what they said was a cougar and implied it may have been a cougar that did the damage, even thought the state biologist said no cougars live in NC anymore.
During the show, several people went out in the woods to try and track the thing down. I saw no evidence whatsoever that any of them were armed in any way. Personally, I am not going out in the woods after a critter that takes down pit bulls without them even able to put up any kind of fight, and not be armed with some serious firepower.
My question is does the lack of firearms indicate they felt the animal was no threat, or that they felt the animal just did not exist and were playing along? or maybe they are just plain stupid.
On a lighter note, they played some animal sounds to some of the witnesses. One of the sounds was a tiger. My little beagle was sleeping on the couch and when she heard the tiger, she got up and started barking and demanded to go outside and confront the tiger she had heard. The other animal sounds did not seem to matter much to her. Just the tiger. I let her out and she did her best to scare off the tiger she had heard on TV.
