wwwprof
Member
I am going to purchase up my first AR (as soon as I sell my HK P2000 in the Trading Post forum). I plan on using it for HD and range shooting. Right now I don't plan on trying to be competitive, but maybe trying something like 3 Gun down the road, although I'm pretty sure I would pick up something different for that.
For what I want to spend, I have narrowed my choice down to a Daniel Defense DDM4v1 and LMT CQB16. I realize that both are well respected and that I would not go wrong with either. However, the LMT would cost me about $200 more and I'm trying to determine if it is worth it for me. I do not plan on changing barrels anytime soon but I like the idea that the sights on the LMT collapse. I foresee putting an optic on the gun in the not too distant future. I know the rail on the LMT is machined from one piece but I don't think it has that much over the DD Omega.
To this point I have been pretty much a pistol shooter with some shotgun and have little experience with ARs. Are there any other comparison points I should be considering? Any of you that have owned/shot both that could offer any insight? Thanks in advance.
For what I want to spend, I have narrowed my choice down to a Daniel Defense DDM4v1 and LMT CQB16. I realize that both are well respected and that I would not go wrong with either. However, the LMT would cost me about $200 more and I'm trying to determine if it is worth it for me. I do not plan on changing barrels anytime soon but I like the idea that the sights on the LMT collapse. I foresee putting an optic on the gun in the not too distant future. I know the rail on the LMT is machined from one piece but I don't think it has that much over the DD Omega.
To this point I have been pretty much a pistol shooter with some shotgun and have little experience with ARs. Are there any other comparison points I should be considering? Any of you that have owned/shot both that could offer any insight? Thanks in advance.