First time experience with a Cap and Ball and what was thought to be a Replica

[Pocket]

I don't know how some of these manufacturing companies are getting around some of the state statutes passing these wanna b's off as replicas.
Not wanting to turn this into a legal discussion but it is deceptive.
Although I was disappointed in the proclaimed 1851 Navy 44 as not being a replica, that experience was a learning and stepping stone and has me in the game now.

 

[LonesomePigeon]

I would think the .44 caliber 1851 Navy qualifies as a replica because the technology is primitive, the loading and firing mechanisms are the same as an 1851 Navy .36 caliber.

 

[Pocket]

I would think the .44 caliber 1851 Navy qualifies as a replica because the technology is primitive, the loading and firing mechanisms are the same as an 1851 Navy .36 caliber.

That is correct according to the ATF and GCA.

The Texas statutes don't use the same Federal verbiage.

 

[Cowhide Cliff]

I would think the .44 caliber 1851 Navy qualifies as a replica because the technology is primitive, the loading and firing mechanisms are the same as an 1851 Navy .36 caliber.

It is regarding the style of firearm but not for someone wanting an actual replica for historic purposes or re enactment. It's not an accurate replica because there was never one made like that originally. So while it's very much LIKE a Colts Navy, it's not a replica.