Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Follow up on Man Charged for Possession of LE mags thread:

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow, Jul 8, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow

    Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,146
    Captain Ayres actually responded to my email thusly:

     
  2. CountGlockula

    CountGlockula Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,522
    Location:
    In a Los Angeles coffin.
    Where's the original story? Thanks.
     
  3. Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow

    Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,146
    Here ya go:

    http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=460411

    actually it was about allegedly STOLEN mags; but the officer thought they were stolen from an army base (for some reason) just because they were marked LE only.

    It's pretty clear from the response that they have very little to no evidence of theft, and have major egg on their face for the incident, since their "information" could obviously not be correct.
     
  4. cassandrasdaddy

    cassandrasdaddy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,203
    It's pretty clear from the response that they have very little to no evidence of theft, and have major egg on their face for the incident, since their "information" could obviously not be correct.


    my computer must be broken you are getting info not making onto my screen
     
  5. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,684
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    This is a dead story. The trooper misspoke. His statement carried no weight and had no bearing on the actual legal issues.

    We're done with it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page