heypete
Member
In reviewing various message boards, I've realized that many of the anti-gunners keep using the "register the guns" arguement about how that'll stop all crime (yeah, right).
I'm curious how that mindset contrasts with FOPA, specifically where it says "No such rule or regulation prescribed after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners' Protection Act may require that records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor that any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or dispositions be established."
Thus, isn't any attempt at registering firearms, even at the state ("politicial subdivision") level a violation of federal law? Does this only apply to registration schemes previously existing (NY? When did CA's handgun registration come into effect? What about the California "assault weapon ban" that required registration?), or to all forms of registration?
Perhaps I'm not understanding the law, but it seems pretty clear-cut to me. How is it that the various states are able to legally enact any form of firearm registration? What about any future federal attempts at registration? Surely they would go against this law, right?
I'm curious how that mindset contrasts with FOPA, specifically where it says "No such rule or regulation prescribed after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners' Protection Act may require that records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor that any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or dispositions be established."
Thus, isn't any attempt at registering firearms, even at the state ("politicial subdivision") level a violation of federal law? Does this only apply to registration schemes previously existing (NY? When did CA's handgun registration come into effect? What about the California "assault weapon ban" that required registration?), or to all forms of registration?
Perhaps I'm not understanding the law, but it seems pretty clear-cut to me. How is it that the various states are able to legally enact any form of firearm registration? What about any future federal attempts at registration? Surely they would go against this law, right?