Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Forgive my French but have you seen this crap??!!

Discussion in 'Activism' started by henrifirstman, Feb 26, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. henrifirstman

    henrifirstman Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2011
    Messages:
    82
    I was surfing the web and I stumbled upon a couple of "pro gun democrat" sites.
    I thought that was cool even if it sounded silly. I figured that at least there were folks on both sides that were on my side... But then I found this.
    I can't even describe the mix of humor, disgust, and bafflement I feel right now.
    http://crasstalk.com/2011/07/a-conversation-between-two-liberal-gun-owners/

    :barf:
     
  2. whalerman

    whalerman member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2010
    Messages:
    835
    Not worth looking at. Confused thought.
     
  3. M-Cameron

    M-Cameron member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,865
    ....i tried reading it......but for the life of me i could not find one consistent coherent thought....


    it was like trying to read the transcript of two people who both happen to have multiple-personality disorder and ADD........
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2012
  4. sigpro

    sigpro Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    100
    Read it, Don't think it's real.
     
  5. jackpinesavages

    jackpinesavages member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    809
    It's a fictional piece, supposedly between 2 women.

    What would you expect? :D
     
  6. Positivity

    Positivity Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2012
    Messages:
    73
    Location:
    South Eastern Virginia
    I had to stop halfway in. The longer I read it, the more of my brain cells I felt shriveling up and dying.
     
  7. walt629

    walt629 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    17
    Location:
    Central Florida
    The liberal elitism is still present, even in this supposed gun friendly discussion.

    Meaning it's good for the elite to own firearms but the great unwashed shouldn't own firearms because they are responsible for "senseless and insane killing", not taking into consideration that the "senseless and insane killing" is committed by the criminal aspect of society.

    Typically liberal.
     
  8. Carl N. Brown

    Carl N. Brown Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    7,816
    Location:
    Kingsport Tennessee
    So the Norwegian massacre in "Norway, a country with some of the strictest gun control in the world" somehow proves false the "Guns don't kill people, people do." Personally I think it proves that gun control can assure a politically motivated armed thug helpless victims.

    I agree with criminologist Marvin Wolfgang's assessment of most murders: the motivation of the actor plus opportunity is more important in the outcome of a murder than the presence or absence of any particular means. The worst murderer in recent history in my hometown killed a woman at a boarding house with a knife and later killed a couple in their home with a baseball bat (those were three of eight murders in 2004-2006). Guns don't kill people, murderers do. The guns that make some murders easier also make self-defense easier, particularly when women are attacked by men, the elderly are attacked by "yutes" or the lone is attacked by the many.

    Well, gee, my father grew up on farm, was a WWII Vet, bronze star, purple heart, VFW member, squirrel hunter, kept an H&R revolver for protection in his Radio-TV shop for years, yet the only time we had loaded guns in the house was when we went to the mountain to hunt or target practice. So does that make us liberal, or conservative, or non-spectrum Karl Hess realists?

    Oh, my "conservative pea brain" is on the verge of exploding!
    The sentence, the part of the amendment with a noun and verb, is:
    "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
    As pointed out in Heller '08, the scholarship of the past 30 years has determined that the introductory phrase ("A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state," NOT "For the purposes of a well armed militia") is an example of why the government has a vested interest in preserving the right of the people (you can raise a volunteer force from a people familiar with arms in times of emergency), but it is not a limit or exclusion.

    The arrogance of self-proclaimed "liberals" in mis-quoting the 2A and sneering at "conservative pea brains" is precious.

    Yeah, and some people would turn in the neighborhood "Anne Frank" if the state ordered a "Final Solution".

    I grew up aware of gun control in the 1950s and 1960s and aware of some of the neighborhood nutjobs and street criminals. The "application for permission to purchase a handgun" that had to be signed Yea or Nay by the county sheriff or city chief of police to buy a gun at a sporting goods store did not phase them: they got guns they way they got booze in our county that was "dry" until 1968: bootleggers who didn't need no stinkin' permits.

    The "reasonable regulations" in NYC, Chicago, D.C. and other "liberal" strongholds amount to defacto prohibition.

    That explains a lot.
     
  9. jackpinesavages

    jackpinesavages member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Messages:
    809
    Right Carl, the Norway massacre tells ME this: a sociopath will find a way to kill, no matter what the gun laws are.

    The AK reference is precious as well. Isn't it in Norway/Sweden/Denmark that all have an AK per household for their militia? Perhaps I'm remembering the country/firearm incorrectly...?
     
  10. Carl N. Brown

    Carl N. Brown Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    7,816
    Location:
    Kingsport Tennessee
    The US has had at least two seperate mass murders with a higher death toll than the Norway massacre: both involved jugs of gasoline used against people in buildings with limited fire exit.
     
  11. Liberty1776

    Liberty1776 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,297
    Location:
    Minnesota
    I must have missed this section of the Second Amendment - didn't notice it either in the construct proposed by Jefferson, or the one ratified by Congress...

    "“For the purposes of a well armed militia.” ???
     
  12. Steel Horse Rider

    Steel Horse Rider Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    2,103
    Location:
    Loveland, Colorado
    I have always been amazed that anyone who realizes the intellect shown by our founders in crafting a guide (the Constitution) if followed could result in a perpetual constitutional republic, could also believe that they would think the military (militia) would need permission to have weapons. :banghead:
     
  13. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    47,612
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    We posted this sticky for a reason: How this forum works (emphasis on WORK). READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!

    The central requirement in this forum is for a plan of action in support of RKBA to be the reason for a post. "OMG!.." or "I'm so pissed..." have no place here. Angry over a real social/political threat to the 2A, come up with a plan to stop the problem and present it here so something can be done about it.

    This is not the Pointless Outrage Forum.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page