Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Friend's new gun

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by critter, Feb 24, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. critter

    critter Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,167
    Location:
    southeast AR
    A buddy of mine took delivery of a 'new' gun yesterday. It is a Ruger Redhawk in .357 mag. Just WOW! What a 'tank' of a gun! I asked him what kind of concealment holster he would need for it!

    I'll (hopefully) get to shoot it soon. Think it will handle +p loads? HA Looks like it would handle 'nuclear' loads!
     
  2. NMGonzo

    NMGonzo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,691
    Location:
    Albuquerque & Santa Fe
    The redhawk will handle what others won't.
     
  3. Lucky Derby

    Lucky Derby Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    2,142
    Location:
    Colorado Rockies
    I recommend an ankle holster. :neener:


    It is probably the most overbuilt DA .357 ever made by anyone. They should have made it a 9 shooter.
     
  4. BossHogg

    BossHogg Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    689
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Nice backup for the .454 Casull Redhawk.
     
  5. Sniper X

    Sniper X Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,635
    Location:
    New Mexico
    If you could stuff a 500 round in it it would probably handle it let alone whimpy +p rouns in .357. Shoot, you could probably shoot +++++PPPPPP++++ in it.
     
  6. God Guns American Cars

    God Guns American Cars Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    Messages:
    24
    Location:
    Maine
    True story. Ruggedest mainstream revolver of all the big companies BY FAR. I have an old Ruger Blackhawk .357 and it has had the crap shot out of it with every load known to man (not really but just about) and it still never misses a beat.
     
  7. critter

    critter Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,167
    Location:
    southeast AR
    Yeah, I tried to wear out an old model Ruger .357. Gave up.
     
  8. mes227

    mes227 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2011
    Messages:
    203
    Location:
    Incline Village, NV
    Seriously, there's no factory ammo out there that will hurt a Redhawk! In fact, if you pick up a box of Buffalo Bore 357 "heavy" you'll see in the fine print that it's only recommended for Redhawks and Super Redhawks. Those things will safely fire anything you can get into the chamber.
     
  9. Nar

    Nar Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2010
    Messages:
    109
    Location:
    NH
    that is kinda scary awesome, I have no experience with redhawks, one of my closest friends has a .44 super blackhawk from his dad and a .22 and .357 blackhawk from his grandfather, i love the things, and have never seen an issue with them.
     
  10. JEB

    JEB Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,056
    Location:
    Douds, IA
    i wasnt aware that ruger made a redhawk in .357. i know they make a blackhawk in that chambering but had never heard of a .357 redhawk, was it discontinued a while back or something? all of a sudden i feel like im missing out on something awesome:eek:
     
  11. RevDerb

    RevDerb Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    642
    Location:
    Near the heart of Michigan's Thumb
    I was wondering about that myself. Not a Blackhawk single action?
     
  12. ultradoc

    ultradoc Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,118
    Location:
    Ohio
    My cousin had a blackhawk or red hawk. Can't remember. It was 15something years ago. It was magnaported and talk about a cannon. I never had the privlidge to shoot it though.
     
  13. KJS

    KJS Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    381
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    i wasnt aware that ruger made a redhawk in .357.

    I'd never heard of that either. Just looked at Ruger's site to be sure and it's only a .44 Mag today, as I had thought.

    One can only guess they decided a GP100 was plenty big and ended production of even bigger.
     
  14. bannockburn

    bannockburn Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    13,750
    I think the Redhawk was introduced in the late '70's to early '80's. I've also seen conflicting information as to when the .357 model was in production. One source says that the blued model was discontinued in 1985, while another one has it as 1991. Production of the stainless model seems to have been from 1984 to 1991. Any Ruger experts please feel free to correct or add any additional information to these dates.
     
  15. Stainz

    Stainz Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,117
    Location:
    Pinson, AL
    According to 'Ruger & His Guns', by R. L. Wilson, the 5.5" KRH355 and 7.5" KRH35, both SS .357 Magnums, were only made from 1984-1991. No listing for a blued variant, like an RH355/RH35, was given. The .357 Magnum RH is a keeper... several '+P+' applications exist - see John Taffin's excellent books. I owned a .45 Colt RH from new for a few years - no thank you on anything RH but the rare .357 Magnum here. Similarly, an original SP-101 in .38 Special would be neat.

    BTW, the .454 Casull was only made in the SRH frame - not the RH.

    Stainz
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page