Glock 27 Question...Experiences/Input appreciated

[ChCx2744]

Hello. Lately, I have been thinking about which kind/what caliber backup weapon I want to carry with me on duty. I decided to buy a Glock and get either a Glock 26 (9) or Glock 27 (40). The reason I chose the Glock 27...well I guess I should start with the reason I chose Glock as the brand. Glock seems to have a good track record in the handgun industry. I've only shot the Glock 27 ONCE in my life and to be honest when I shot it...It kind of hurt my palm. I think it was because my hand was sweaty and it kept moving around and the little serrations on the grip rubbed against my skin. Besides that, It is a perfect size for concealed/backup carry. The reason I chose the caliber in .40SW is because...Well I was originally gonna buy the Glock 26 9mm because that is the caliber my service weapon is, but I decided the .40SW round would probably be more ideal for the use of a backup weapon in the first place, should the situation arise. I took into account possibly having to stop the BG with a limited amount of ammunition, therefore stopping power with few shots is important. I figured since I will most likely not be carrying extra magazines for my backup (unless I can find a mag carrier that fits on my vest like the Glock 27 will), I will need something with some UMPFHHFHFHF when it goes BANG.

Any suggestions? Stories from experience? Warnings? Advice? Anything related to the Glock 26 or 27 is appreciated, however, please no advice on any .45ACP or .45GAP Glocks because our department does not let us carry that caliber on duty.

 

[earthworm]

I think I'd'a gone with the 26,assuming your duty weapon is the 17 or 19:same caliber & the mags fit. I have the 27 'cause I pack the 23:same idea.
The 27 DO take a bit of getting used to but is far from uncontrollable,etc.Mine shoots as well or better than my 23,but the longer grip of the 23 makes range sessions more comfortable. I doubt you'll be unhappy,but if you are you ought to be able to at least get your money back on a sale or trade.

Food for thought & not trying to hijack the thread:
Lots of savvy cops I know favor the J-frame concealed-hammer Smiths for BUGs.5 for sure,fire through the pocket,arguably less bulky,lots lighter,& reortedly rides better in an ankle holster (if you go that route).

 

[ChCx2744]

I understand what you are saying about the same caliber as my service weapon, but here is the problem: My service weapon isn't a glock, It's a Beretta 92G

There really aren't very small Berettas that I can utilize as a backup weapon, let alone use the same mags as my service weapon. Glock seems to be the perfect company to buy a backup weapon from, therefore I gave some thought to the G27...I see where you are coming from though

 

[gunseller2]

+1 on what earthworm suggested. My agency issues Glock 22/23s so I purchased a 27 for a BUG. I was happy with the way it shot after I installed the Pierce grip extention. I just couldn't find a way to carry it comfortably with the rest on my gear. I ended up with a S&W 342 five shot and a couple of speed strips. I carried it on a vest holster in the warmer weather and in my jacket pocket when it got cool.

 

[Al Thompson]

Shot both the 27 and 27 bunches. They both hurt MY hand - the bottom of the grip frame (where the lanyard hole is) is exactly in the center of my palm. 50 rounds will leave a bruise. I find that for a BUG, I like a J frame S&W better - eaiser to carry. The G26/27 is better for a belt gun, but YMMV.

 

[Ala Dan]

Actually, I can shoot the sub-compact Glock 27 better than I can a Glock
23. The G-23 wants to twist in my hands, even with a tight grip. The G-27
seems more too push backwards; rather than recoil upwards and away.

 

[420Stainless]

The two I've tried have handled well and shot with good accuracy. I don't like the way they look, but everything else about them seems very good to me.

 

[mongo4567]

I've shot both the 26 and 27, they are both fine guns. I have a 27, but I only got it because it was a great deal. If I were going to carry a small backup in 40, I would lean towards the Kahr PM40.

 

[357sigRog]

If you want UMPFHHFHFHF when it goes BANG then definitely get the G33----(357sig).

 

[The Lone Haranguer]

I disliked both the bark and bite of one I had, and sold it.

 

[CountGlockula]

I'm also getting a G27 for a back up. Great choice! And if you're worried about ammo capacity, a G22 mag will also fit.

Let us know how you like it, when you get it!

 

[Ben86]

I prefer 9mm in a sub-comp. because they are easier to shoot than .40, so I went with the Glock 26. And when you use premium ammo, the difference in stopping power between 9mm and .40 is so slim I don't even worry about it.

I've also heard that J-frames ride better in ankle holsters.

 

[Uglyoldpoorman]

Hated the 27 love the 26.

 

[CPshooter]

I had a 27 and sold it. 40s&w is a great caliber for self-defense against humans, but so is any good 9mm (Gold Dot, HST, etc). I think the 23 is a better platform to shoot .40s&w. If you are looking at the sub-compacts I have to suggest the 26. Especially with the cost of .40s&w ammo these days...good luck!

 

[ChCx2744]

357 sigRog:

You, sir, have taken the words out of my mouth. I shot a .357sig Glock at the range 2 days ago and man...The thing I am about to say next may be somewhat of a shock to some...to others maybe not: The friggin .357sig's recoil was harsher than a .45ACP! It was even LOUDER than the .45ACP! I do not know why, but the range personell said that's how .357sig is supposed to be! Can anyone elaborate?

 

[CPshooter]

The friggin .357sig's recoil was harsher than a .45ACP! It was even LOUDER than the .45ACP! I do not know why, but the range personell said that's how .357sig is supposed to be! Can anyone elaborate?

That's just how .357 is. The .357sig was designed to have the same ballistic performance as .357 magnum out of a revolver. There's more powder pushing a 9mm bullet at very high speeds. A loud BANG and a big flash is usually what you get. Same deal with the .357sig.

 

[ChCx2744]

I decided to go with the G26, due to the capacity and availability of ammo...1 extra round can make all the difference in the long run.

 

[dairycreek]

I have owned and shot both the G26 and the G27 and have fired them in "side by side" comparisons on a number of occasions. I chose the G26 because it was much, much more controllable.

I have very, very large hands and am not at all "recoil aversive" though I must say that the G27's recoil was much more noticeable than that of the G26. In my large hands the G27 would twist when shot and I had some difficulty keeping a good, solid shooting grip on it. Not so with the G26. For me it was as simple as that.

 

[Airman193SOS]

The first gun I ever bought was a 27, and I've never regretted it. It has always functioned reliably, it has never hurt my hand even after long range sessions, and to my mind it is fine in its stock form, no grip extensions needed. As always, though, YMMV.

 

[benderx4]

I rented a 27 once and I found it to be too "snappy" for my likings. Sometimes the caliber is just too much for the size (and weight) of the gun. (Think S&W 340PD) I believe this is one of those cases as well.

 

[Buckhannon]

I carry a Glock 27 with a 13 round G23 mag. Plenty of needed rounds and still easy to hide. Give it a try.....

 

[theotherwaldo]

I like my G-27. If I could have found a G-26 for the same price ($200, like new in tupperware) I probably would have liked it better, though. The G-27 is a snappy little handful but it works pretty good in the self-defense mode. I installed a LaserMax guide rod, since every time I've needed a self-defense gun it's been either a low-light situation, with the threat silhouetted, or a transitional situation, with the light level changing during the confrontation. All of my back-up mags have grip extensions, although, since I pocket carry, I usually keep a basic magazine in it when it's holstered.