Contemplate this for a moment. Ebert liked "Gettysburg" because it was a Northern victory.. I saw the movie and am reading the book -- quite a few differences, in fact I was told that the movie draws more from a book about Stonewall from a Virginia Tech history professor than than "Gods and Generals". I believe it because of the character development of the first hundred plus pages that I've read so far. I saw the movie with my wife and son and one of my daughters. I enjoyed it, felt it could have been better, my daughter left at intermission and went next door to Books a Million, wife so-so, son enjoyed it. I'm not saying anything that some of you don't know but some folks really did have ugly beards.
I have two pet peeves about the movie and both are unavoidable.
1) Jeff Daniels has not aged well since "Gettysburg".
2) Logistically, the dependence on reenactors as extra made for a much older demographic of the soldiers than what I would have expected.
I have two pet peeves about the movie and both are unavoidable.
1) Jeff Daniels has not aged well since "Gettysburg".
2) Logistically, the dependence on reenactors as extra made for a much older demographic of the soldiers than what I would have expected.