Gonzales again emerges as Supreme Court contender

Status
Not open for further replies.

rick_reno

member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
3,027
I'm sold - Alberto would make a fine jurist.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/09/scotus.gonzales.ap/index.html

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has critics on the left and right but he's as popular as ever with the one-man constituency that matters most: President Bush.

Their closeness and Gonzales' Hispanic heritage have again placed him among leading contenders for a job on the Supreme Court.

Bush has given Gonzales five different jobs in the past 10 years, starting in Texas as the top lawyer to the governor. Gonzales became the nation's first Hispanic attorney general in February.

The prospect of a lifetime appointment to the high court has renewed concerns among both liberals and conservatives. If anything, conservatives have been far more pointed, questioning Gonzales' views on abortion and affirmative action.

Manuel Miranda, former counsel to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, said conservatives have indications from the White House that Gonzales indeed is being talked about for a seat on the court, much to their consternation.

William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, said in a column on the magazine's Web site that Gonzales would be a mediocre justice and not a reliable conservative vote.

Ralph Neas, president of the liberal People for the American Way, said his group has "serious concerns regarding a Gonzales nomination," primarily over his role in crafting U.S. policies on interrogation and treatment of suspected terrorists.

The president has even jokingly stirred speculation over his fellow Texan. Bush said this week the list of potential nominees "is wide open, which should create some good speculation here in Washington."

Then Bush looked across the table in the White House Cabinet Room and added, "Make sure you notice when I said that, I looked right at Al Gonzales, who can really create speculation."

Gonzales has deflected questions about his interest in the job and whether he is being seriously considered.

He has acknowledged critics have a right to their opinion, but in the next breath said he's concerned only about one man's assessment.

"I'm primarily worried about what does the president think," Gonzales said in an interview with The Associated Press in July, after Bush had nominated John Roberts to the court, but before Chief Justice William Rehnquist's death created a second vacancy.

Gonzales also casually acknowledged his closeness to Bush when asked whether the president had interviewed him for a court seat. "I think the president interviewed folks that he felt he needed to interview to get to know and assess their qualifications," he said.

Rehnquist's death makes Bush the first president with two openings to fill at the same time since Richard Nixon in 1971.

Other possible replacements include federal appellate judges Edith Clement, Edith Hollan Jones and Emilio Garza. Also mentioned are judges J. Michael Luttig, Samuel A. Alito Jr., James Harvie Wilkinson III and Michael McConnell, and former Solicitor General Theodore Olson, lawyer Miguel Estrada and former deputy attorney general Larry Thompson.

Gonzales' seven months as attorney general have been relatively quiet -- perhaps intentionally so after the stormy tenure of Attorney General John Ashcroft. Gonzales promised a different tone and promptly opened his office to a meeting with civil libertarians who never got time with Ashcroft.

The famous blue curtain erected during Ashcroft's tenure to obscure partially clad statues in the Justice Department's Great Hall came down this year, a decision Gonzales said he didn't make, but also didn't overrule.

Gonzales has been a prominent cheerleader for Roberts, while defending the White House's decision to withhold documents from Roberts' service as deputy Solicitor General under President George H. W. Bush.

Gonzales has made no major policy changes and has led the administration's fight to renew expiring provisions of the anti-terrorism Patriot Act. He also has continued Ashcroft's pursuit of obscenity cases.

Gonzales has not publicly revealed his views on abortion.

While serving on the Texas Supreme Court, he upset conservatives by joining a majority ruling that a 17-year-old girl could seek an abortion without telling her parents.

In a concurring opinion, Gonzales criticized the dissenting judges, including Priscilla Owen, for "an unconscionable act of judicial activism."

Owen recently won a long-sought Senate confirmation to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, but opponents often used Gonzales' words against her.
 
See related thread:

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=155569

Bush needs to look for a judge who, regardless of demographic niceties, can Stop the Insanity on SCOTUS and halt the country's slide to the Left through judicial activism. If he doesn't get that he shouldn't be making the appointment. If Gonsalez were that judge I'd be for him--Latino or no Latino--but his record doesn't look promising in that regard.

I don't see why Latinos somehow "deserve" a spot on the Court any more than anyone else. SCOTUS must "look like America," is that it? All this says is that Bush's thinking on this matter is superficial and Part of the Problem. I don't think "loyalty" and "friendship" should have any bearing on who is selected for a position of this high and vital importance.

"Family values" have their place but not as the chief criteria for our top political offices. I thought we'd seen the worst of this kind of flagrant buddyism when JFK picked Bobby to be A.G.
 
Gonzales' Ballistic Illiteracy...

... is THE major reason why he is not qualified for SCOTUS.

Example:

He stated last year that he SUPPORTS renewal of the Assault Weapons Ban -- because his brother is a Houston police officer and, thus, his brother's life is threatened by those eeevil semi-automatics (*!!*).

This proves 3 things:

1. Gonzales knows nothing about guns.
2. He believes the 2-A is about duck-hunting, NOT about citizens' self-defense rights OR rights to resist tyranny, oppression, or corruption/abuse of political power... AS THE FOUNDERS INTENDED.
3. Thus, Gonzales is NOT a strict Constitutional constructionist, but most likely another wishy-washy "moderate" who'll likely evolve into another dreaded-by-conservatives centrist "swing vote" on the Court.

Beyond that, a case could be made that Gonzales might even have to recuse himself from any future case involving gun-rights.

Does anyone here actually believe that such cases (especially in the wake of New Orleans post-Katrina gun confiscations) will NOT come before the Court sometime? As head of the US Dept. of Justice, Gonzales has a major leadership opportunity RIGHT NOW to help correct the outrageous, Constitution-busting events in New Orleans.

Ashcroft would have, but Gonzales/Bush won't. While Gonzales might be the "easier" choice for Bush, he's not the right one. Case closed.
 
Condi Rice should get the job. The Dimwits would go along, just to preclude the possibility of her running for Prez.
 
I'm not sold on the Condi Rice Cult. Yeah, she's very pro-2A, or so she says, but she has no elective office experience and has yet to work any miracles in foreign policy. Like Gonsalez, she has been the beneficiary of the Bush "halo effect." Her tenure as academic provost at Stanford hardly qualifies her to run foreign affairs, although I'll acknowledge that academic infighting certainly qualifies as vicious and machiavellian.

Bush has plenty of great candidates to choose from. He knows how important this choice is. Either he'll do the right thing or he won't. If he blunders the high-riding GOP is headed for a slide as early as next year's mid-term elections. The illegal alien issue isn't going away, and Bush is still befogged on that one so far as I can tell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top