The Honorable Alberto R. Gonzales

Status
Not open for further replies.

MAUSER88

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2004
Messages
670
Location
NJ
http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/gonzales-bio.html





The Honorable Alberto R. Gonzales
Counsel to the President

Judge Al Gonzales was commissioned as Counsel to President George W. Bush in January of 2001. Prior to serving in the White House, he served as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas. Before his appointment to the Texas Supreme Court in 1999, he served as Texas' 100th Secretary of State from December 2, 1997 to January 10, 1999. Among his many duties as Secretary of State, Gonzales was a senior advisor to then Governor Bush, chief elections officer, and the Governor's lead liaison on Mexico and border issues.

Prior to his appointment as Secretary of State, Gonzales was the General Counsel to Governor Bush for three years. Before joining the Governor's staff, he was a partner with the law firm of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. in Houston, Texas. He joined the firm in June 1982. While in private practice, Gonzales also taught law as an adjunct professor at the University of Houston Law Center.

Among his many professional and civic activities, Gonzales was elected to the American Law Institute in 1999. He was a board trustee of the Texas Bar Foundation from 1996 to 1999, a board director for the State Bar of Texas from 1991 to 1994, and President of the Houston Hispanic Bar Association from 1990 to 1991. He was a board director of the United Way of the Texas Gulf Coast from 1993 to 1994, and President of Leadership Houston during this same period. In 1994, Gonzales served as Chair of the Commission for District Decentralization of the Houston Independent School District, and as a member of the Committee on Undergraduate Admissions for Rice University. Gonzales was Special Legal Counsel to the Houston Host Committee for the 1990 Summit of Industrialized Nations, and a member of delegations sent by the American Council of Young Political Leaders to Mexico in 1996 and to the People's Republic of China in 1995.

Among his many honors, in 2003 Gonzales was inducted into the Hispanic Scholarship Fund Alumni Hall of Fame, was honored with the Good Neighbor Award from the United States-Mexico Chamber of Commerce, and received President's Awards from the United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce and the League of United Latin American Citizens. In 2002, he was recognized as a Distinguished Alumnus of Rice University by the Association of Rice Alumni and was honored by the Harvard Law School Association with the Harvard Law School Association Award. Gonzales was recognized as the 1999 Latino Lawyer of the Year by the Hispanic National Bar Association, and he received a Presidential Citation from the State Bar of Texas in 1997 for his dedication to addressing basic legal needs of the indigent. He was chosen as one of the Five Outstanding Young Texans by the Texas Jaycees in 1994, and as the Outstanding Young Lawyer of Texas by the Texas Young Lawyers Association in 1992. Gonzales was honored by the United Way in 1993 with a Commitment to Leadership Award, and received the Hispanic Salute Award in 1989 from the Houston Metro Ford Dealers for his work in the field of education.

Gonzales was born in San Antonio, Texas and raised in Houston. He is a graduate of Texas public schools, Rice University, and Harvard Law School. Gonzales served in the United States Air Force between 1973 and 1975, and attended the United States Air Force Academy between 1975 and 1977. He is married to Rebecca and is the father of three sons.
 
This may have been hashed out in another thread (I have limited time at work to read), but does anyone know his positions on CL or RKBA?

Fact he's from Texas tells me a lot, but LBJ was from Texas too, so I have to ask.

Another thing, does he have the killer instinct necessary to be the nations "boogeyman"? Sad to say it that way, but the AG definitely has a tough position to fill.

Hopefully he'll be better than his predecessor, and it's a given he'll be better than Reno.

jh
 
RKBA is critical but there's more at stake here. Can we count on this man to seal our porous borders against the horde of Mexican invaders? I don't think so.

Can we count on this man to protect other Constitutional rights? I doubt it -- he was one of the author's of the Bush administration's position paper claiming the right to declare citizens not involved in armed conflict against the United States as "enemy combatants" and to incarcerate them indefinitely, without legal recourse or representation, just on "suspicion."
 
Hawkmoon said:
RKBA is critical but there's more at stake here. Can we count on this man to seal our porous borders against the horde of Mexican invaders? I don't think so.

Can we count on this man to protect other Constitutional rights? I doubt it -- he was one of the author's of the Bush administration's position paper claiming the right to declare citizens not involved in armed conflict against the United States as "enemy combatants" and to incarcerate them indefinitely, without legal recourse or representation, just on "suspicion."

Which does not mean he believes in it. He was being the president's lawyer. Bush asked, "is it legal somehow for me to do this? Give me a written opinion".

Gonzalez researched and came up with a way. My atty does stuff like this all the time.
 
Looks like one of those deals where you either check out his court cases in that short period for RKBA stuff (if any) or just wait and see. Texas' SecState job performance wouldn't give any clue, SFAIK. VinsonElkins is a Biggie, but they're mostly civil and political.

Art
 
Consider the source: "I can tell you already he's a better candidate than John Ashcroft," snaps Democrat Sen. Charles Schumer.
 
Schumer's endorsement, as it were...

is somewhat worrisome.

Especially since Ashcroft was a strong supporter of the 2A, to the chagrin of Chuck Schumer, Josh Sugarman and Sarah Brady. Or have we forgotten Ashcroft's landmark letter to the NRA not so long ago, perhaps overshadowed by our distaste for the Patriot Act? :(
 
Everyone keeps mentioning Ashcroft's statement that the 2A is an individual right, but I can't recall ever seeing any evidence that he acted on that statement. Did his DoJ do anything to reduce prosecution of unconstitutional gun laws? Didn't his DoJ file "collective right" positions in a couple of Supreme Court gun cases a couple years back?
 
Ian, I agree with you that Ashcroft was not pro-2A. The difference between Ashcroft and a Democratic AG is that a Democrat would enforce non-existent gun laws in the name of public safety. See e.g. Clinton's no-guns-in-public-housing scheme.
 
Ashcroft got the NICS records of law-abiding gun sales destroyed in 24 hours. (That is a big good) He did change the position of the DOJ to an individual right from one of NO individual right. He also fought with the City of Chicago over releasing NICS info to help in their Law suit aganist gun manufactures. These thing do matter. He had terrorism on his hands most of the time. Remember as much as some dislike the idea of the Feds looking at what books someone checked out in a library. The Dems have no problem with knowing every firearm you own. This list is O:K to them period. Not even a squeak of concern about the 2nd amendment or the right to privacy. They say you one NONE.
 
Gonzales is on the short list of SCOTUS nominees.

Senate judicary committee staffers have a joke. " "Gonzales" is Spanish for "Souter".

As nice as it would be to have a Latino on SCOTUS, he needs to be constitutional constrained in his interpretations. I know of nothing of Gonzales record that makes that point.
 
My quick read is that this guy is a smart Harvard-educated lawyer who made the right friend (GWB) at the right time. The rest of his resume looks like appointee jobs. I don't see either prosecutorial eminence or judirical eminence. What qualifies him to be either AG or on SCOTUS?

Yeah, we all know he fills a diversity slot and that Bush is "compassionate." Spare me.
 
O really? There are certain elements of the looney right that still love Uncle Adolf, just like there are certain elemnts of the looney left that still love Uncle Joe.....

WildneedIsaymoreandgetusintobannedsubjectmatter?Alaska
 
'Twas just a joke. I wasn't serious. Though I do think "center" is as fallacious a term as "left" and "right". Just too many issues and too many stances and too many ways of thinking to be only 3 political classes.
 
This guy is even more of a kook and fascist than Ashcroft was - I amazed at the audacity of appointing someone who openly supports tossing out a thousand years of civilization by re-instating TORTURE as a common practice.

The Israeli's quickly found out that by even allowing "light physical persuasion" in cases considered "immediately important (aka "the ticking time bomb") to the state" is a slipperly slope that cannot be stopped and leads only to savagery very often without any accountability.

There is NO slippery slope with a situation like torture - it is aLWAYS wrong.
 
Waitone said:
Just out of curiosity, what is torture?

I'll take a shot. How about forms of persuasion that are not politically correct. Ways of engaging in combat felt necessary yet about which the folks back home would rather not be aware. They can't handle the truth.
 
Waitone said:
Just out of curiosity, what is torture?
The UN defeines it as: "torture means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions."
RealGun said:
I'll take a shot. How about forms of persuasion that are not politically correct. Ways of engaging in combat felt necessary yet about which the folks back home would rather not be aware. They can't handle the truth.
First off, combat has nothing directly to do with torture so I don't know whay you're throwing that in. Once a person is an EPW, his period of comabt is over so combat has nothing to do with it. If you really think we should allow torture, then you're basically saying that our own people should be allowed to be tortured as well. You think the beheading videos are bad, imagine being in a conflict with another country and having them broadcast our soldiers being skinned alive, put on the rack, strappado, being raped with redhot irons, genital mutilation, and much more. Do you really want to send our troops into a conflict where such treatment is not only normal, but expected?
 
CannibalCrowley said:
First off, combat has nothing directly to do with torture so I don't know whay you're throwing that in.

It has everything to do with combat. The attempt to get strategic information out of prisoners is standard procedure. How far you go with it is the question. I think I would be naive to think that it is always done by the rules or that commanders didn't apply pressure to give them some useful interrogation results.

It would be inappropriate to make me the focus of a lot of vitriol. You attribute things to me that I never stated.
 
To WildtheyarebothleftistsAlaska

I don't know why people keep repeating the falsehood that Hitler was a right-wing dictator. The Nazi party was the National Socialist Party....Socialist, left wingers. They were also Fascists which uses national, ethnic or religious characteristics as an excuse to repress or kill those that do not belong to the select group. Fascism could be right wing or left wing, but is almost never found in centrist societies. The fringe Neo-Nazi groups here in the USA seem to be anti-government ethnetic-hating Fascists who would also hate the government control that Hitler believed in.

Leftists hate Hitler because he attacked Stalin, a hero to many leftists. They ignore the fact that Hitler was a Socialist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top