Hey all - as I explained in my other thread, I'm trying to work up a ballistic clone of XM193. It would be nice to know that I can replicate XM193 if the SHTF, etc., but I'm wondering if I'd be better served by a gentler load for general purpose.
I'm using 55 gr. FMJs, H335, and CCI 450 magnum primers. My Lee reloading manual specifies standard primers and H335 from 23.0 grains to 25.3, so with the magnum primers I have tested from 23.0 to 24.4 in my 16" chrome-lined midlength Rock River. I shot all these loads today over my chrono in addition to XM193 and was dismayed to find that even 24.4 grains of powder only yielded 2875 fps compared to XM193's 3145.
But, 2875 is no slouch. Provided I'm not going to war anytime soon, a 2875 fps load will be easier on the gun and I imagine on the suppressor that will hopefully clear ATF in one month. The 2875 load grouped and POIed similar to XM193 - how does 2875 compare to your general AR .223 load? What are your numbers like? What is a good balance between a general load that's easy on the gun and consistent, realistic practice load?
Thanks, all.
I'm using 55 gr. FMJs, H335, and CCI 450 magnum primers. My Lee reloading manual specifies standard primers and H335 from 23.0 grains to 25.3, so with the magnum primers I have tested from 23.0 to 24.4 in my 16" chrome-lined midlength Rock River. I shot all these loads today over my chrono in addition to XM193 and was dismayed to find that even 24.4 grains of powder only yielded 2875 fps compared to XM193's 3145.
But, 2875 is no slouch. Provided I'm not going to war anytime soon, a 2875 fps load will be easier on the gun and I imagine on the suppressor that will hopefully clear ATF in one month. The 2875 load grouped and POIed similar to XM193 - how does 2875 compare to your general AR .223 load? What are your numbers like? What is a good balance between a general load that's easy on the gun and consistent, realistic practice load?
Thanks, all.