GP 100 .44 Spl range report

Status
Not open for further replies.

Riomouse911

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2013
Messages
11,872
Location
Ca.
Prior to picking up the Colt Cobra in the other review, I also stepped into a GP-100 in .44 Spl., paying just over $600.00 OTD. The following is a brief range review.

Fit and finish:

The revolver is a polished stainless, and yes, it’s ALL steel. The gun looks chunky with the unfluted cylinder sitting below a wide, flat topstrap. The 3” full lug barrel gives it a very nose-heavy look, but that is a bit deceiving as it actually balanced well. The gun was well polished on the exterior, with no machine marks on the outside. Inside, there were some minor machining marks on the bottom of the cylinder window, the recoil shield, and near the forcing cone. This is purely cosmetic, but they are there and make getting powder/lead residue off of those surfaces a bit tougher.

The sideplate finish was very good, with just a hint of a fingernail-snag if I ran it over the seam between the trigger and grip. The release latch pushes in and is easy to reach and operated without issue. The barrel has a full lug to add a bit of weight, and the ejector rod pulls empties without any cases sticking in the cylinder. It’s a Ruger so it has that stupid “read instruction manual” garbage plastered on the left side of the barrel, and a big (and wholly appropriate) “Ruger GP 100” on the right.

When it first arrived, IMHO it looked unbalanced with the short (3") barrel on the opposite end of the full sized rubber grip. I felt that it needed either a ½” or so longer barrel, or a smaller grip, to “look right.” I thought about finding some smaller grips, one with a bit less length. When shooting heavier loads, the grip grew on me and they ended up being just right in the hand.

The gun came with a lockable fitted gray “Ruger” hard case with a “Ruger” padlock, instruction manuals, yellow empty-cylinder insert, and a zip-loc baggie with a copper hammer-disassembly pin inside.

Sights and trigger:

As I wrote in the Colt review; I have never liked the external appearance of “Hi-viz” style sights. To me they seem to be too big and look too fragile, and I have just never liked them. These are a bit different; the pipe is not as open and exposed, and there is a bit more “Patridge Blade” in its appearance than most of the Hi-viz sights I have seen. The green insert did glow well in broad daylight, and like the Colt sight it was very easy to pick up. The rear sight is an adjustable unit with an all-black blade set in a shallow groove in the topstrap for protection. The sight picture is a classic flat blade squared-off “U” in the rear, with the front sight having a large green dot. Up close and at arm’s length the front sight fits pretty well into the rear sight notch, and the front left just enough light on either side to make side-to-side adjustments easy to do. The front dot does sit low enough to have a tiny bit of “eclipse” when held with the “top of the front sight even with the top of the rear sight” alignment that I am used to. The front is not as friendly as the one on the Colt, but it is a good sight system none the less.

The trigger felt a bit over 9 lbs in DA, and over 4 lbs in SA modes. I don’t have a trigger pull gauge, but it seemed to fit into these weights. The trigger press is a smooth arc, with a noticeable stack in the last ¼” or so of travel. Unlike the Colt, the GP 100 is easy to “stage,” with the click of the cylinder stop hitting home in the notch clearly heard even with plugs on. Once it is staged one can align the sights with the bullseye for the final bit of travel.

Shooting observations:

As I stated the grip looked funky at first, but shooting a mix of lead 200 gr RNFP and 200 gr Berry’s plated HP’s powered by Unique, recoil with the stouter plated loads became noticeable. A smaller grip would have made the gun a bit easier to conceal, but a lot less controllable. For me, shooting a larger revolver with adjustable sights usually involves firing at least six shots, and I will say that the fifth and final shot came and went awfully fast. Luckily the shots were on-target and moving with some energy behind them, so should it be used in a defensive manner a solid hit with an appropriate bullet should show some effect.

The first 10 shots were fired at 7 yards into a 4” circle, with the shots landing a bit high and to the right of center for me. This may be a result of my tendency to occasionally flinch, or the sights being off a touch, but it is easily remedied with effort (flinch) or the turn of the screwdriver (sights off).

Ruger GP 1.jpg

I then shot a 30-round qualification course with the same batch of mixed ammo consisting of 200 gr LFN and 200 gr Berrys plated hp reloads. I fired 5 shots each, starting at 15, 12 10, 7, 5 and back again to 7 yards. As I said before, I am no match-grade shooter but the DA pull was smooth enough to keep me in the scoring box for all 30 shots again.

Ruger GP 2.jpg

As with any medium-framed, hammer-spur equipped revolver, draws from concealment are a bit tougher than with a bobbed, shrouded, or enclosed hammer revolver. Again I had to place my shooting-hand thumb over the hammer spur (with my trigger finger ALONGSIDE the frame) while drawing to keep it from snagging on my shirt. Again, this is a rather bulky revolver, so this may not be the best choice for concealment under summer-type clothes. Under a cool-weather jacket in a hip or a shoulder rig, this gun would carry just fine.

Closing:

This is a fun gun for those who are looking for a bomb-proof .44 Special-chambered gun. The pros are: a good trigger, 5 shots of potentially stout ammo for black bear/fishing use, it is well made, good adjustable sights, it is accurate, and good factory grips. The cons are: it is a bit heavy/bulky for only 5-shots, and with the adjustable sights offering a good sight picture I think a bit longer sight radius of ½” would make it a bit more versatile and balance the looks a bit better. As it sits the GP 100 .44 Spl. will be the perfect tool for hunting camp wear, fishing in black bear country, or for having handy around the farm to pop a coyote or dispatch injured critters.

Stay safe!
 
Looks like a fine pistol. The 44 Special is an excellent self defense round, big bullet, punches a big hole, and mild mannered. Skeeter Skelton stories induced me to buy a number of 44 Spl's, never regretted a single purchase. Thanks for the review.
 
Thanks for the good review of what seems to be a fine revolver. I already have a couple of DA .44 Specials, but you never know...your review could come in handy in the future. I agree that a short barrel stainless .44 Special could make an excellent camp gun.
 
there were some minor machining marks on the bottom of the cylinder window, the recoil shield, and near the forcing cone. This is purely cosmetic, but they are there and make getting powder/lead residue off of those surfaces a bit tougher.
It's stainless, so you can fix this yourself.

Great looking .44 Spl. I'm a sucker for the caliber. :)
 
Thanks for the review. I'm looking to add another 44 special to the stable.....My Bulldog is lonely. I'm holding out for a blued 6" version to compliment my stainless 6" 357. The GP100 is an excellent platform for small to mid caliber handgun cartridges.
 
" The sideplate finish was very good,"
There are no sideplates on Ruger DA revolvers. Mere mention of them can cause confusion, when some may assume they have sideplates like S&W or Colt. The Ruger design is intrinsically much stronger.
 
You are correct and my nomenclature was not. There isn't a traditional side plate like a S&W, however there is a fitting seam between the upper part of the frame and the lower that allowed a fingernail to snag when rubbed downwards along the side of the frame. (You can see it in the pictures.) The lower was a bit proud, sticking out enough to catch the nail. On other specimens I hope it will be a smoother transition between these two metal pieces. This was about the only "flaw" I found, and even this wasn't a big deal when compared to other guns I have found with all sorts of fit and finish issues. :)
 
I haven't seen a 3.5" .44 Spl cataloged, only the 3". Does Ruger make a longer barreled .44 Spl for a group like TALO or Davidsons?

Oh, I just found the compact GP-100 grips with the wood insert on Ruger's website. I may grab a set and put them on. This looks like the cat's meow for giving the GP .44 a more balanced look.
 
Last edited:
Very good write up thanks. I may have to revisit the dearth of DA Rugers in my safe. I currently don't own any. Most especially since it's in my favorite calibre. I blame Skeeter for that. And I've never regretted a single 44 special purchase either.
 
There's the 5" I pictured above.
Cool, they are beautiful! And like I said I haven't seen any other lengths catalogued, was that a special order .44? Does the 5" barrel carry well? (I can guess it shoots a bit nicer than the 3" with stout loads)
 
A VERY useful pistol. Ruger is going to sell a ton of them.

Too bad S&W can't keep up anymore. Profits and the status quo are more important than innovation or improvement. So sad.
 
Too bad S&W can't keep up anymore. Profits and the status quo are more important than innovation or improvement. So sad.

Smith & Wesson got real innovative when they brought out the short barrel Model 69.

Every time I wandered past the counter at my LGS, a faint, little voice kept calling....buy meeeeee. :evil: Couldn't help myself so I went ahead and added a 5-shot GP100 in .44 Special to my fall / winter carry rotation. I now have both the short barrel model 69 S&W and the 3" GP100. The " heir" has a "spare". Got a carry gun and a range toy. Looks like I need to get an El Paso Saddelry General Patton two-gun rig, or just carry one in the belt holster and the other in my Miami Classic shoulder rig... LOL ;) Well, we can't have too many lead dispensers, can we? :rofl:

Here is a head-to-head comparison between the S&W and the Ruger:

Except for grips and a change in the sights that I made on the 69, both are production guns, both are 5-shot. Neither has had any action work...DA/SA is stock. The Ruger came with what I think is the better front sight. I like Hi-Viz sights. I replaced the S&W 69's plain sights with a tritium front night sight and a C&S rough country rear sight. That is the rear sight S&W put on their innovative Night Guard series.

Since I run magnums occasionally in the 69, I ditched the production grips and put the Hogue Sorbothane grips made for the .500 Magnum on it. Much more comfortable for heavy loads. The 69's factory grips work well and are comfortable with Specials. The Ruger's grips are also comfortable with the Specials.


IMG_1760.JPG



No difference in perceived recoil between the S&W and Ruger was noted when firing Specials. Very pleasant experience. The DA trigger is noticeably better on the Model 69. It is very smooth. The Ruger's feels gritty to me, with some stacking, but should even up over time with use, or it'll take a trip to the gunsmith. The Smith is easier to shoot. Both balance well in the hand and are natural pointers.

IMG_1759.JPG

I got my digital kitchen scale out, zeroed it and checked the weights of both revolvers. The S&W model 69 weighs in on my digital kitchen scale at 34.875 ounces. The Ruger GP100 weighs in at 36.125 ounces, so Ruger's spec sheet is accurate for this one. Since I live in the woods and carry daily, the nod goes to lighter carry weight for me.

The 69 has a 2-3/4" barrel, the Ruger has a 3", so not much difference length-wise. The Ruger's barrel is chunkier in profile and is a force fit in my Model 69's Galco OWB open top pancake holster. It "fits", but will stretch the leather. The Ruger's cylinder is shorter, which is to be expected because the GP100 is a .44 Special only. The Model 69 is a .44 Magnum.

S&W does offer innovative products...just sayin'. Between the two, I nod towards the Smith 69. Here I get a lighter, trimmer package that will fire Magnums as well as Specials.

With regards to service, I have sent guns back to both Ruger and S&W for service/repair. My experience has been positive with both manufacturers. Both took care of my needs and I have no worries with either company.

Both revolvers are excellent choices vis-a-vis the .44 Special cartridge, and brand loyalty will win out.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1752.JPG
    IMG_1752.JPG
    64.6 KB · Views: 3
Thanks for the review and for the actual real world weight. Except for the cost savings I see no reason to buy the Ruger.
 
I just read about the shorter barrelled M-69. It looks like a great choice with the option of full-power rounds, especially if you are an Alaska or Montana/Wyoming/Idaho fisherman who stumbles upon a brown bear who gets mad. But I can imagine firing magnums out of it are brutal. (My 629 Mountain Gun is about the "small-end" size-wise limit for me for enjoying full-powered .44's. )

With the .44 specials I can't see there would be much of a difference, and you will be well served with either one.

My real hope is to stumble on a 624 3" or 4" that I can afford...to me there's just something about the .44 special in that N frame platform... :thumbup:
 
Thanks for the write up. I'm waiting on a 5-inch in stainless to join my 3-inch ...

index.php
 
But I can imagine firing magnums out of it are bruta

They are attention getting, but the Hogue Sorbothane grips make magnums doable. I replaced the factory grips with Pachmayr Diamond Pros, but my fingers got hammered by the trigger guard. The big .500 S&W Magnum grips are a better choice for this particular gun. It is heavier than the alloy N-Frame 329 PD and doesn't slam back as much. It is down right pleasant to shoot with even the heavy Buffalo Bore Specials, though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top