Larry in wyoming
Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2021
- Messages
- 619
The 22mag was my preferred round of choice in that situation, but the 22lr will do. Stretch the range past 100yds and it's time for a 223.
I've heard that before. I've even heard (I'm talking about the rock chucks we have here) people call the smaller ones "friers," and the larger ones "bakers."FYI .... They're can be good eating as well
A friend of mine had a similar problem. His garden was being destroyed. He was shooting them with a .22, but they would make it back to their den under the shed before they gave up the ghost. His only other rifle is a .223, which might be a bit much. I have a .22 WMR, which I think might be just the thing.A woodchuck showed up here and was burrowing into the space next to my retaining wall. We have large rock retaining walls on 2 sides of our house. So I broke out the .22LR, snuck up and shot him in the head. He flopped around a bit, but then made it back into my retaining wall, where he promptly died. I could not get the %$^^ thing out without digging up 1000's of pounds of rock. So there he lay stinking that entire summer.
I had to chuckle a bit at that. As I've written about a few times on THR, my wife and I have killed hundreds of ground squirrels over on our friend's ranch in the last couple of springs. Last winter thinned them out somewhat, but in the spring of 2022, our friends were nearly overrun with the little varmints.Had to wait a few days for a confirmed kill when the other woodchucks in the den dragged the dead one out for coyote food when it started to get "ripe".
Under 50 yards, I use a .22 with subsonic ammo. Head shots, only.
Under 50 yards, I use a .22 with subsonic ammo. Head shots, only.
Yes, he definitely neeeeeeds a new gun for this!!Sir, you need a new gun. A .223/5.56 will suffice but if you intend to switch it up to include any other pesky North American animal made from tastier meat, a .308 will be the better choice
Well aimed shot and you’re good to go. Have a heart trap also works to catch them. You can move or shoot as needed. I tend to leave ‘em alone unless they cause a fuss, then I terminate with remorse. As I get older I hate killing things. Don’t take that as a “I won’t”. Just a would prefer not.
That's been my experience with rockchucks and .22LRs - even with the so called "high velocity" .22LR ammo. In truth though, I've never tried any of the .22LR "hyper velocity" ammo (like "Stingers and "Yellow Jackets") on rockchucks.It seems to me if you don't get a good clean head shot, they will run off.
Proly last weekend to hunt chucks here, w beans getting some rain. But one little field is so ate up, theres a lot of dirt visible between cover and crop.
.......... That reminded me of the time back in the 1980's when I was thinning out the woodchucks on a friend's farm. Was laying down prone watching some active 'chuck dens about 150 yards distant with a .22-250 on a bipod, when a 'chuck popped up from the high grass less than 50 yards away. My job was to thin out the 'chucks for the land owner so I just couldn't pass this one up. ... At under 50 yards I could have just done a head shot with a 22LR if needed at that range. The 55 gr. .224" jacketed soft point made a pretty big exit wound. Photo title should be "Overkill". That's a digital pic of an old snapshot. Glad I had my old Instamatic film camera with me that day.The hyper velocity stuff might work better with body shots, I don't know. Like I said in my previous post, if I was serious about hunting rockchucks, I'd use my .22-250 - they don't run off when I hit them in the body with that.