Gun laws a minefield for military

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
Gun laws a minefield for military

By GORDON DILLOW
The Orange County Register

As thousands of U.S. military personnel in California deploy to the Persian Gulf in preparation for war, some of them are having a serious problem.

They can't get guns.

Oh sure, the military provides them with an array of weapons: M-16s, grenade launchers, squad automatic weapons and so on. They're heavily armed.

But a lot of military types, particularly guys in special-operations units, like to supplement some of the standard-issue weaponry with privately purchased handguns and gun-related equipment of their own choosing. Often the handguns and equipment they can buy in the private market are better and more advanced than the standard-issue stuff.

But getting those handguns can be a big problem in California, which has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the nation. Although law enforcement personnel are exempted from many of the restrictions on purchasing firearms, military personnel stationed in California are not - even if they're on their way to a combat zone.

"It's a sad state of affairs," says Evan Carolyn, a former Marine who owns Evan's Gunsmithing and Shooter's World in Orange. "There's no way for us to assist these guys in getting the best stuff they can."

For example, recently some members of a special-operations unit - I'm not supposed to say which unit - told Evan they wanted to buy some compact 9-millimeter handguns as personal backup weapons before they shipped out. Unfortunately, there's a 10-day waiting period for firearms purchases in California - and the unit had to leave before the waiting period was up.

And even if they had bought the handguns, they would have had to make do with 10-round magazines instead of the 13-round magazines the weapons are capable of holding. That's because California law bans the sale of "large capacity" magazines - more than 10 rounds - to anyone but police officers.

"We're seeing this kind of thing all the time," Evan says. "This is how we're treating the military in California."

Spokesmen for the state Attorney General's Office, which regulates firearms sales, told me they were aware of the problem involving military personnel and firearms restrictions - but there's not much they can do about it. Even if he wanted to, the attorney general can't waive any of the statutory restrictions on gun sales - not even for guys headed off to war.

And as for the state Legislature amending the gun laws to exempt military personnel under certain special circumstances - well, don't hold your breath. After all, they're the same guys who passed these silly, ineffective laws in the first place.

So that's the situation we have today in California. Apparently we trust our military personnel to handle tanks, machine guns, missiles, grenades, mortars, howitzers, aircraft carriers, submarines, jets, bombs and nuclear weapons. And after making them wait a week-and-a-half, we even trust them enough to let them buy a handgun that holds ten rounds.

But they'd better not ask for one that holds eleven.

http://www2.ocregister.com/ocrweb/o...section=LOCAL_COLUMNS&year=2003&month=2&day=9
 
Hehehehehehehehehehehe.....heeeeehehehehehehehehehe.....


GOOD!!!

Don't misunderstand me: It is horribly sad that that is happening to our men.

I wish them the best, and wish that they could have access to ANY guns they want, but it is good that this is happening, because perhaps it will open a few eyes. (Or more than a few...)

Though they'll probably just legislate another "loophole" for Mil and LEO rather than give us slaves, er...subjects, er...DARN, CITIZENS, back some of our RIGHTS. :rolleyes:


Going to email this article far and wide...
 
I mean, liberalism means never sending your boys out into the battlefield well armed... "Fair, and reasonable gun laws", they forgot to add "that will get my sons and daughters killed"..

:barf:
 
Doesn't matter anyways. What these "spec-ops types (I can't say which...)" were trying to do is illegal and they would be burned if caught with personally owned weapons (POW's) on a deployment.

Another thread for another time.
 
JimP: Not all of the rules apply to those brave men when considering equipment; just like they dont have to adhere to the grooming standards normal troops follow.

Kharn
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top