Gun maker wants Grunow to pay fees

Status
Not open for further replies.

Waitone

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
5,406
Location
The Land of Broccoli and Fingernails
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localn.../tuesday/local_news_e3ee4826949212a90012.html

By Bill Douthat, Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, June 17, 2003



WEST PALM BEACH -- A gun distributor wants the widow of slain school teacher Barry Grunow to pay its defense costs, including attorney's fees, from last year's five-week trial.

The Valor Corp. say it's entitled to recover its legal costs because Pam Grunow lost her lawsuit accusing the Broward County company of being responsible for her husband's death.

Valor sold the.25-caliber handgun that Lake Worth Middle School student Nathaniel Brazill used to kill Grunow on the last day of school in 2000.

A jury found Valor 5 percent responsible for the teacher's death and awarded Pam Grunow and her two children $1.2 million, but the verdict was reversed by Circuit Judge Jorge Labarga, who presided over the trial.

An attorney for Pam Grunow called Valor's move a "heavy-handed" attempt to pressure Grunow to drop her appeal of Labarga's ruling.

"What a horrible thing for an industry to do to a widow and her children," said Rebecca Larson, who along with Bob Montgomery represents Grunow.

But Valor attorney Tom Warner said the company has spent a lot of money on the lawsuit and wants an end to the costly litigation.

"I think she's a courageous woman and it's terrible what happened to her husband," said Warner, a former state legislator and state solicitor general who is handling the appeal for Valor.

"I don't think we are pressuring her into doing anything," Warner said. "It's legitimate for the defense in this case, which is out of a lot of money, to say, 'When is this going to end?' "

Warner confirmed that Valor has offered not to seek the recovery if Grunow's appeal is withdrawn.

Valor says it's entitled to recovery of attorney's fees because Pam Grunow turned down an offer of $200,000 in March 2002 to settle her lawsuit without going to trial.

The settlement offer was rejected because it didn't even cover the expenses to that point in preparing for the lawsuit, Larson said. During the trial in October, Montgomery told the jury he was seeking a jury verdict of $75 million.

The lawsuit claimed the Saturday night special handgun sold by Valor was inherently defective and should be sold only with safety locks.

Brazill, who was 13 when he shot Grunow outside a classroom, had stolen the gun from the home of a family friend. Brazill was convicted of second-degree murder in 2001 and sentenced to 28 years in prison.

A hearing to decide whether Valor is entitled to recover attorney's fees is scheduled for July 25.

Valor filed a separate request to the court to recover other expenses. Neither motion gives estimates of those costs.
 
I believe Beretta also has a policy of always suing to recover attorney's fees. I hope it becomes a stronger deterrant to the lawyers in the near future, and that Valor gets all their bills paid by Grunow.

Oh, and how widely circulated was the Judge's reversal of the jury's ruling? I never heard of it until this article.

Kharn
 
Oh, and how widely circulated was the Judge's reversal of the jury's ruling? I never heard of it until this article


I read of it on the net but then I admit I read a lot.

No you did not miss it in mainstream media it was not there. Unlike the original verdict.:cuss:

NukemJim
 
About time.

Good for Valor. "Going after a widow" in this PC media climate is indeed brave.

Actually, automatic recovery of court and legal fees from defeated plantiffs would be an excellent start to tort reform in this country in general, and one that the trial lawyers lobby ought to get behind since they'll get paid either way...
 
Some of the money should come out of the damned lawyer's pockets.
Maybe they won't be so quick to file these BS law suits:mad:
 
"Some of the money should come out of the damned lawyer's pockets.
Maybe they won't be so quick to file these BS law suits"

Oh NO! That's not the case at all, M2!


"Valor says it's entitled to recovery of attorney's fees because Pam Grunow turned down an offer of $200,000 in March 2002 to settle her lawsuit without going to trial.

The settlement offer was rejected because it didn't even cover the expenses to that point in preparing for the lawsuit, Larson said. During the trial in October, Montgomery told the jury he was seeking a jury verdict of $75 million."


Oh wait. Maybe it is...

Obviously the case was taken on a contingency fee basis. I wonder A) How much the contingency was, and B) how much the attorneys ultimately spent on the case for a great big fat zero gain...
 
Under Florida law and court rules, award of attorney fees under the offer of judgment statutes and proposal for settlement rules is MANDATORY if the judgment is one of no liability or the judgment obtained by the plaintiff is at least 25 percent less than the offer, unless the party that did not accept the offer/proposal can show that the offer/proposal was not made in good faith (very difficult to do). See Florida Statutes, § 768.79, which provides in pertinent part:

(1) In any civil action for damages filed in the courts of this state, if a defendant files an offer of judgment which is not accepted by the plaintiff within 30 days, the defendant shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorney's fees incurred by her or him or on the defendant's behalf pursuant to a policy of liability insurance or other contract from the date of filing of the offer if the judgment is one of no liability or the judgment obtained by the plaintiff is at least 25 percent less than such offer, and the court shall set off such costs and attorney's fees against the award. Where such costs and attorney's fees total more than the judgment, the court shall enter judgment for the defendant against the plaintiff for the amount of the costs and fees, less the amount of the plaintiff's award.

If Valor crossed its ts and dotted its is, the court will be required to award costs and fees. Pretty cool, huh? :D

Then again, this is Palm Beach County we are talking about... :rolleyes:
 
The Valor Corp. say it's entitled to recover its legal costs because Pam Grunow lost her lawsuit accusing the Broward County company of being responsible for her husband's death.

Thank you, Valor Corporation!

My hat's off to you for standing up and holding the leftist extremist anti-Second Amendment bigots legally accountable for their attempted predations.

Well done!
 
"What a horrible thing for an industry to do to a widow and her children," said Rebecca Larson, who along with Bob Montgomery represents Grunow.
What a stupid thing for a widow and greedy lawyer to do to an industry and the noble "gun culture" of America.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top