My father subscribed to Gun Tests for a number of years and I enjoyed reading the free copies.
Otoh, read the rebuttal letter to GT written by the owner of Rohrbaugh. Rohrbaugh supplied the pistol reviewed as a loaner - the serial number in the pics prove it.
http://www.rohrbaughforum.com/index.php?topic=4746.0
Heck, here's part of it. If you have questions, Mr. Rohrbaugh posts on the forum since selling the company to big green.
"Yet, the R9S you reviewed was sent to you from the factory as a testing and evaluation piece. I should know, since I am the one who sent it to you. Subsequently, you returned the piece after your evaluation. Nowhere, at any time did you purchase the firearm. I would think, since your reputation is such that you purchase firearms, you would have had a disclaimer in the article that you did not purchase the piece and clarify your position.
Since you did not purchase this piece, you were sent one magazine. All Rohrbaugh pistols are sent with two magazines, one lock, an instruction manual and a lockable carrying case. You seemed distraught by the fact that only one magazine was provided and that thought was evident by the amount of verbiage that was used throughout the article.
I feel that at this point in the letter, I should point out a very salient fact (while we are at the beginning) - the pistol that was tested, by GUN TESTS, was the exact same one, Serial #R170 (see photos in the American Handgunner and the photo in GT,) that was tested approximately a month prior, by AH, and then sent to you. Ironically they seemed to have a different opinion of the function, accuracy and reliability. I might also point out that Serial #R170 was also tested by Massad Ayoob approximately one week ago at a workshop in Long Island, after you returned it to our factory. His opinion regarding the accuracy and reliability did not seem to match yours.
Now I could go into various descriptions, “in my estimation” of you and your report, but I shall stick to the obvious mistakes."