Gun writing??

Status
Not open for further replies.

luke411

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2006
Messages
3
I was just curious as to if anyone here can enlighten me on how to get involved in being a gun writer. I've been asked several times by my friends and family for my recommendations on firearms (as i am apparently the go to guy for answers on that subject in my group).

Recently I was asked by my dad if I could type up some of my recommendations on guns for personal/home defense and concealed carry for a close friend of the family. I shared the resulting document with my friends and all of them keep telling me I should send it in to a gun magazine and see what they think.

Now granted I know that gun writing is not a very lucrative way to make a living, but its something that has always intrigued me since I am planning on going into the law enforcement field here in the not too distant future, and have great deal of respect and get a great deal of enjoyment from all aspects of the shooting world.

Well onto the heart of the thread, below is the document that I prepared for that family friend, and I would welcome any feedback at all on what you all think.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

By: Luke H. Sollitt
October 26, 2005
[email protected]



So you’re thinking of buying a handgun for personal protection. Well the truth be told your options are pretty endless in what to get; and I’ve enclosed some suggestions on handgun choices for both men and women.

But before we get into all that I feel it prudent to cover two important things that are often overlooked and not mentioned when you walk into a gun store for the first time and talk to the guys behind the counter; responsibility and mindset.

In my humble opinion the responsibility of firearms ownership comes second to only that of being a parent. That being said before buying a handgun you have to be prepared to be responsible in getting trained properly, storing it safely, cleaning it between range sessions, and maintaining your shooting skills on a regular basis. All topics we will cover later.

As to mindset, before you even consider buying a gun you need to ask yourself if you are prepared to take a life in defense of yourself or a loved one. I am not going to mince words here; none of this BS about “well I won’t shoot someone, I’ll just scare them with the gun” or “well I’ll just shoot him in the leg, I don’t have to kill him.” Both of these are utter nonsense and things I have actually heard people say when I do my routine eavesdropping of people at the counter at my local gun stores. SOO lets not beat around the bush here. If you buy a gun, be prepared to use deadly force; I know the more politically correct term here is shooting to stop, but in truth you shoot to remove a threat, which simply put is shooting to kill. If this is something that gives you pause, and something that you cannot bring yourself to do for any varied reason, reconsider owning a firearm, because brandishing a firearm at a threat you are not prepared to deal with properly will only end up in tragedy for you and not your assailant.
________________________________________________________________
Well before I get into my recommendations lets talk about training, storage, and cleaning.

TRAINING

I feel I need to mention the importance of maintaining ones skill level with a firearm. A gun is only as accurate as its owner. As with any motor skill the more you practice the more it is ingrained into muscle memory. One can spend loads of money on a really expensive firearm, but if you don’t practice with it routinely it becomes a moot point. That being said I highly recommend that you be prepared to spend at least 1-2 nights a month shooting between 50-100 rounds through your handgun at each session, with 100 being my recommendation. As an example when I go to the range, I spend roughly one hour there going through my 50-100 rounds. The time involved is a small investment when it comes down to the importance of knowing you are confident in shooting when and if you need to in a defensive situation.

STORAGE

Now on to storage. Proper and responsible storage of the firearm is vitally important. However several considerations and tradeoffs must be considered; those being security and accessibility. You want to be able to store the handgun securely but still have it accessible when you need it. That being said I would suggest two options both of which I have enclosed information sheets on.

The first of these is known as a lifejacket, it is a simple clamshell enclosure made out of either polymer or steel, and basically it totally envelopes and locks around the action of the pistol (the hammer, slide, and trigger). With the pistol locked inside it is not much bigger than the pistol itself which easily allows the pistol to be easily put in a bedside table for example. It even has mounting holes which allow it to be mounted to the bottom of a dresser or nightstand drawer for added security and comes with a keyed lock built in.

The other option is more toward the traditional safe type storage devices. For handguns I would suggest a lock box type, of which there are many different types available that are mountable to either the floor or wall with many different methods. Many of these types of safes include options such as keyed entry, keypad entry, and even models which scan your fingerprint to release the locking mechanism. That being said I would always stick with the whole simpler is better mindset and recommend the keyed lock type. As for specific suggestions on this I would recommend visiting a local gun store and seeing what they have, getting a feel for its ease of use and operation and then deciding what works best for you. I have included an info sheet on one of these types just to give you a better idea of what they look like.

CLEANING

Being how the firearm could be the one thing that could save yours or a loved one’s life someday; keeping it clean is of the utmost importance. I am not going to go into great detail here on what’s involved in cleaning a handgun, as most competent gun stores can recommend a very comprehensive cleaning kit for the firearm you end up purchasing.

The only thing I will stress here is the imperative importance of how YOU MUST CLEAN YOUR GUN EVERY TIME YOU SHOOT IT. Shooting firearms leaves nasty residues on the gun that attracts dirt and grime which can affect the functionality of the firearm and cause it to malfunction at a most inopportune time.
________________________________________________________________

OK. Well that being covered on to my recommendations. Which I will break down for men and women separately.

For starters handguns can range in price from very inexpensive i.e.: 200-300 dollars all the way up to 2500 dollars for the custom built pistols. My recommendations will fall in the low to moderate range of around 300-600 dollars.

MEN:
Before I go any further with my recommendations, recognize that these are only my opinions, and before making any decision visit your local gun store and handle different firearms. Visit a local range such as Bellevue Indoor Range and rent some of the guns that you were intrigued by at the store counter. My recommendations are just that, they are mine, based on my own history and experience with guns, and let me say now that every gun owner, regular shooter has his or her own opinions/preferences and recommendations when it comes to handguns for self defense. Ok, well I had to say it (my own personal disclaimer)... on to the fun stuff.

Right now the most ubiquitous firearm in defensive shooting and law enforcement if the GLOCK family of weapons. (I have included a datasheet on one as well as prices just FYI.)

I own a GLOCK, I enjoy shooting it. That being said I do have my own druthers when it comes to the GLOCK. Many people will tell you that it is an easy weapon to train on. While this being true I honestly feel that it is not the best first choice when it comes to self defense for one main reason, the lack of a safety. I am a big fan of guns with manual safeties. That being said this is my opinion and as I’ve said, take a look at and shoot different makes and models of guns before you make a decision.

As for my recommendations. As to the type of firearm for men I would recommend a semi-automatic pistol in caliber .40 S&W. I personally feel that this is the best caliber for all around personal defense. It has good penetration and stopping power and has a firm but not wrist killing recoil. It is a very manageable caliber.

Now on to the gun itself. I picked the following gun maker and its products because of their reputation, their value and their features as well.

I am a big fan of the Taurus family of weapons, and in particular their polymer framed pistols in .40 S&W. Taurus is a Brazilian company, and they have developed a well earned reputation in quality and innovativeness over the past 10 yrs or so.

In particular I would recommend two of their models. I say two because they both are perfectly acceptable for home defense, but one of them lends itself to concealed carry better than the other. They are the 24/7 pistol and the Millennium Pro PT-140, and I have included information sheets on both.

I like these pistols for several reasons. They are lightweight, have high magazine capacity, and are loaded with safety features including a manual thumb safety, as well as a keyed lock on the gun itself which locks the slide of the gun and blocks it from functioning. They are also reasonably priced. At my own local favorite gun store they list at $349 for the 24/7 pistol, and $319 for the PT-140. But as I have said before these are only my recommendations and highly recommend you talk to the guys at the gun store and also see what they have to say as well as handle the guns yourself.


WOMEN:

When it comes to female shooters, especially novice ones, I tend to shy away from recommending a semi-automatic handgun. A lot of women lack the upper body strength to be able to successfully manipulate the slide on a semi-automatic pistol, and for that reason I tend to lean toward a revolver. Plus, a revolver is a very simple weapon to use and train on and involves fewer steps for use than a semi-automatic. That being said, and like I have said before, handle and rent both types of firearms and get an idea what best suits your needs.

When it comes to revolvers my recommendation is for a compact AKA snub nosed revolver. One that is rated to shoot .357 magnums or at the very least one that is rated to handle a .38 special +P. While the .357 magnum is a powerful handgun load and can be punishing to shoot in smaller weapons, the upside is that weapons chambered for it can also shoot the .38 special round, which is much less punishing to shoot; and also guns chambered for .357 magnum are generally heavier guns which makes it very controllable when shooting the .38 specials

As with my recommendation for men my recommendation for women involve two choices from Taurus (both of which I have included information sheets for). The first of which is the Taurus Protector which is a snub nosed five shot revolver in both .357 magnum and .38 special (+P). I like this gun for several reasons. For starters is has a shrouded hammer which lends it self to concealed carry, but still allows it to be cocked if so desired, it has an adjustable rear sight which is unusual for a gun its size, and is a very welcome feature since the sights on these types of guns are very rudimentary. It also includes a built in lock in the gun which locks the hammer in place and does not allow the weapon to be fired.

Next is the Taurus model 617. This is more of medium framed revolver, in that is larger and heavier than the Protector. It is perfectly acceptable for concealed carry but more thought and care is involved when selecting a mode of carry than would be involved in the case of the Protector. I like this gun because it still has the same locking feature as on the Protector, but its larger size allows the gun to be a seven shot weapon instead of a five shot.

With both of these I would recommend going with the steel frame version of these weapons. They are both available in versions with a titanium frame to make them lighter, but my feeling is that lighter makes them more uncomfortable to shoot over extended periods of time, especially when shooting .357 magnum loads and some of the really potent .38 special +P.

The suggested retail price of the Protector is $383 and the model 617 $391 both in a blued steel finish.

-------------------------------------------------------

Well thats it... Fire away.. I welcome any and all criticism (and please you die hard glock aficionados please dont rip on me too hard about the glock, i love and carry my glock ALL THE TIME.)

Oh, and a final note, before anyone asks, a little about myself.

27 yrs old, born and raised in the greater seattle area, been shooting since I was nine, and been carrying since I was 21, I have a BA in criminal justice from Seattle University, and was a Police Explorer/ Explorer Advisor for over 6 years.
 
This may be less about gun writing and more about providing an "expert" opinion.

Imagine for a minute that you went to a general contractor and told him you wanted to build a house, and the contractor immediately began telling you how much lumber, concrete, plumbing materials, and electrical materials you would need to purchase. It wouldn't make sense, right? At that point the contractor doesn't know a lot about what kind of house you need, how large it will be, where it will be located and many other factors that really determine a lot about the materials to be used.

Regardless of what the item is that someone is purchasing they are motivated by a problem they are trying to fix. If you don't understand the problem and the surrounding factors of that problem it's not likely your advice will be too relevant. The outcome will eventually be that your credibility is brought into question. Someone buys what you recommend, but because you didn't understand the problem and surrounding factors, they end up buying something that is completely out of line with what they wanted.

There are a lot of reasons for owning a weapon, not just self defense. Sometimes the factors driving the need for a weapon might not even suggest a gun. It's alright to voice your opinions about guns, but it's not the only opinion out there, and might not even be relevant to your reader. Case in point, while a LOT of women tend to be happy with revolvers many are not. Many are quite capable of handling a semi-automatic, even a full-sized one. The correct answer to "what gun is best as a first weapon for a woman" is, "that depends."

It depends on what she wants it for, her size and upper body strength, her commitment to training/practicing with it. LOTS of factors. There's a reason for the old military saying, "assumption is the mother of all f***-ups.

There's nothing wrong with offering an opinion as long as the premise for your opinion is obvious or made clear. The premise of your writing here assumes buying a weapon for self defense or home defense. Again, that's a popular reason for buying a gun, but not the only one. And the real question is WHY do they feel they need a gun for DS or HD? A gun may not be the answer. Moving out of a neighborhood might be the right answer. A handgun may not even be the answer. And there are an even greater range of questions beyond the assumption of a handgun for personal protection such as whether there are children in the house, who will be using it, where/when it will be carried outside the house, are they interested in using it in sporting competitions..and the list goes on.

There's a reason why there are so many options as far as gun models, holsters, lights, safes, etc. It's the same reason there are a lot of models of cars, computers, and everything else. Because one size doesn't fit all...and the role of the "expert" is to provide an understanding of that mapping between option and customer need. So the best experts spend their efforts trying to communicate what market a given option tends to be geared toward and the trade-offs it might incurr. Therefore, the real expert on guns is also an expert on market demographics.

I'm not really picking at your writing style. That seems fine and pretty well organized. But as a successful consultant for over 30 years I hope you'll take this in the way it was meant, as constructive criticism about offering "expert" opinions.
 
+1

Pick up a copy of _Handbook of Magazine Article Writing_ and _Freelance Writer's Guide_ .
Some of the best firearm journalism I've seen as a reader in the last couple of years were articles on the gunblast website. There is usualy not a lot of fluff, just enough description, a lot of hard data so I can draw my own conclusions, and an average Joe doing the shooting. We all know a guy like him, so he's trustworthy.
Nowadays, one of the best ways to break into firearm journalism is to start a site like Gunblast and just start posting articles to the web after you send them around to the gun rags for consideration. The people who surf firearms websites are a much tougher crowd than any editor and they'll let you know if your stuff is good enough.
Developing your own successful website will give you way more street cred than publishing in mags, and editors want writers with street cred because it makes their mag look less like a front for advertisers. Just to name a few: Jim Carmichael, John Taffin, Ross Seyfried, Elmer, Skeeter...
However, being a cop, ATF, FBI, or CIA agent, and any number of other things doesn't automatically make your name sellable or text worth reading these days any more than working at a daycare center makes you an expert on childbirth. It takes experience and the ability to relate that experience well in a text format. So, you may want to take some journalism classes and develop your skills in accordance with the injustry standards of journalism in terms of format, voice, and style.
Good luck in your endeavor to become a firearms journalist.
Most of all, have fun with it.
 
my own experience says that first of all you must understand that you do not know everything about your subject (guns), and will never know everything
This will give you a good motivation to search for new knowledge and experience.
In this quest you will find a lot of more or less interesting things that you will like to share with others.
For me it came that way. I just collected gun knowledge until it started to leak out of me ;)
First it was website and some UseNet groups; then, magazine articles, later books ;) It just grows up with me.
For me gun writing is to find new knowledge first, and only then to share it with readers.
 
Okay, so you have no expertise in the subject and no worthwhile credentials. No problem. Ideas can be plagarized and credentials invented.

One well known gun writer's expertise appears to be based on the fact that he was a pipe fitter. Another was a high school English teacher. I gather others come from IT backgrounds or studied statistics in college.

Oh well.
 
I'd certainly go along with WheelGunSlinger on the recommendation regarding developing your writing style. There's a lot more to getting an idea across than just plopping it down on paper.

Personally, I think the biggest challenge in gun writing is finding interesting topics to write about. I'm constantly underwhelmed by many of the subjects talked about in today's gun magazines. They more or less are rehashes of ideas and techniques that have been around forever, and offer nothing new in terms of insight or fresh thought. And those that do seem awfully silly and naive.

I'm reminded of an article I read recently (not sure which magazine it was) in which the author was formalizing how prepared you were to deal with an armed conflict by categorizing shooters into four or five really cool tactical sounding "levels" corresponding to how much range time, training, experience you've had. I don't blame that writer as much as I blame the editor for really thinking that would be something useful to his audience.

As a technical writer you provide value to your reader by "pre-digesting" and analyzing research. Either research you've personally experienced over a long period of time, or research you've spent a significant time gathering and analyzing. Say what you might about Mas Ayoob, but he is one of the best at drawing fresh perspectives out of a given set of research or historical data, and that's what makes him one of the very few interesting writers out there.
 
I appreciate all the criticism. Everyone is right, I have had no formal training, and I am in no means an expert, I just consider myself a well read and well experienced member of the firearms community.

The little blurb i wrote (in case i had neglected to mention it) was in response to a friend of the family who not just wanted to buy a gun for personal/home defense, but also wanted to buy one for his wife. And while granted i knew i was gonna get a lot of flak regarding the the whole "not as strong as men" comment (and i realized that i was generalizing ) but my generalization was just an opinion and i did add the caveat that it was just that, and encouraged the potential reader to discredit me by trying different types of guns and see what works best for them.

The whole point of my little exposition was not first and foremost to give the intended reader (a husband and father of two) a recommendation on the specific gun to buy, but more of a demonstration that gun owning is not an enterprise to be entered into lightly, that it is fraught with responsibility, and if you are not of the mindset to understand and cope with that reality, perhaps you should reconsider getting a gun for defense. My hope was to give him pause, to think about all the ramifications, and then make and informed decision, not one on the spur of the moment and based on fear.

My own personal opinion when it comes to owning a firearm for home defense: if you are not prepared to face all the consequences, responsibilities and the reality of being a gun owner, dont be one, get a stronger lock for your front door.

I am in no means an expert, and I loathe most of all the guy you see at your local gun store who think they are the know all and end all of gun knowledge in their own little minds. One of the greatest joys i get about the shooting community is the ability to add to my knowledge base and shoot more varied types of firearms. I know that i will never learn all there is to know about guns, but i damn well want to try....:)

I will in all means take your criticisms and recommendations to heart, and keep em coming by all means..
 
Don't discount the female ability so quickly. While all of YOUR experiences with females may indicate that semi-autos are less that stellar choices, it certainly does not hold true for all of them.

There is nothing about the supposed female problem with semi-autos that can't be fixed with training/education. For example:

"She's not strong enough to rack the slide."
First of all, upper body strength has nothing to do with ability to rack the slide. She may not be strong enough to pull the slide rearward while holding the frame stationary (especially with the smaller models which tend to have strong springs; and I know men who can't rack slides in this manner), but she is definitely strong enough to push the frame while pulling the slide to the rear. This little trick has helped many a gal on the firing line.

She's recoil sensitive.
Probably because the big bad male helping her out told her that she probably wouldn't like the larger calibers because the recoil was hard/heavier/worse/whatever. Newbie gals tend to be completely ignorant when it comes to firearms and we will believe what we hear unless we have reason to believe differently. By planting such crazy thoughts in our heads, you've only set the stage for yet another issue to overcome. (This in no way indicates that I think new shooters, male or female, should start out with the heavy hitters. For those completely new, the least amount of snap, crackle, pop they have to deal with the better. Move them up slowly as their comfort with firing a gun in general improves. But do not sabotage anyone by telling them what they will want to avoid.)

Her hands are too small for semi-autos.
Maybe...for specific models. But there are plenty of models out there designed specifically for the female's smaller grip. Of course, there's my favorite, the 1911, whose design itself makes the grip just peachy for even the shortest-fingered woman. (That single-stack thing is great!)

I know that this isn't exactly what you wanted, but it's something to think about when you start handing out "recommendations" out to females. I personally don't think that there's any difference between a new male shooter and a new female shooter except the preconceived notions they or we bring to the firing line.

Perhaps the best recommendation for a new shooter, male or female, is to find a firearm that you are comfortable with and can shoot proficiently with. Period. End of sentence. Sure you can make comments on the PROs and CONs of varying types and models, but ultimately the newbie has to make the decision for him/herself and nobody in that situation needs "opinions" clogging the brain.
 
Get rid of run-on sentences, misspellings, and misused punctuation (including misplaced commas and unnecessary semi-colons). The best article in the world will still land in the editor's trash heap if it looks like he'll have to put a lot of work into cleaning it up for publication.

Get rid of all jargon and all cliches. Commonly, new writers are urged to write the same way they talk. This is bad advice, because most people sprinkle their conversation with unnecessary, redundant, superfluous, and annoying clutter. "In my humble opinion," "OK. So ..." and "Well that being covered..." are all examples of phrases that work well in speech but don't really belong in print.

When all the cliches are gone, replace them with vivid and original word pictures that allow the reader to clearly visualize what you intend to communicate.

Write about what you know. If you're not a woman and have not had significant experience working with women shooters, you don't yet have any business expressing opinions about what women-in-general should purchase. Even expressing opinions about what guys-in-general should get is risky. As a guy, you know which handguns suit exactly one guy. Get some more generalized experience before you make generalities.

Narrow your focus. Magazine articles are surprisingly short from the writer's perspective. If you try to cover a lot of ground, you won't cover any of it very well and you will shortchange your readers. An article about selecting a first gun should instruct the reader how to select a first gun ... and that's all it should do. If you have more to say about things related to but not exactly centered upon that exact topic, don't weaken what you already have by saying them. Instead consider selling your idea as a series of "new shooter" articles, and focus each of those articles on a single aspect of new gun ownership.

Target your article to a specific publication. A writer doesn't write for "the gun magazines." Rather, he writes each article for a specific magazine, intending to please a specific editor and matching his writing style to the style favored by that editor in that magazine.

Write about stuff you can take pictures of. :) That one has tripped me up more than once. Writing an excellent article is the first step. You need to know that if you cannot come up with pictures to go with it, you may not be able to find a market for it. (Ummm, see the paragraph above, though. Most editors prefer to see lots of good pics. A few have in-house photographers and don't necessarily need a lot of photos from the field. You do have to know your editor's needs.)

Oh, and take heed of what ARperson wrote. She's right.

pax
 
I commit gun prose regularly, and get paid for it (somewhat less regularly.)
Years ago, I was also an editor for a short while.

The piece you posted would feel the bite of the editorial chain saw, if I was at the submissions desk. There are quite a few places where you basically restate the same idea. That makes the piece slow moving. Tight writing reads more smoothly.

Your post might also be two or three pieces in one. The safety device info, for instance, might work better in a separate article. Magainzes usually have tight space requirements. Selling a short piece can be easier than selling a longer one.

If you become a cop some markets may be available to you that aren't open to those who aren't police. There's a new magazine out that claims to be written just by folks "on the job." I can't recall the name.

I don't discount the things you have learned in shooting since age nine. I fired my first shot at six, started shooting often at 12, and have never been in the service or a cop. I write about hunting, match shooting, shooting practice, reloading, and favorite guns. The mix has worked fairly well for me.
 
Two points:

(1) Take a course on grammar and punctuation. Yours are not ready for prime time.

(2) Being able to write will not help you become a gun writer. The publishing game is all about knowing someone who knows someone who can help you get your foot in the door. If you don't know someone -- forget it.
 
Hmmm... First, you need to understand your topic and write to that topic specifically.

In the posting above you've gone into many topics. If you're writing a book, that's fine - a chapter on training, a chapter on guns for small-framed individuals (not just females), etc. If you are considering magazine articles, you want to make sure you have content for your next article.

I think it is commendable that you are inspired to do some writing, but you should evaluate your motivation to do so. Is it because guns and writing are a passion? If so, you'll make improvements and overcome the initial obstacles in time.
 
I've myself wouldn't mind being a gun writer. Not to make any money in fact I don't care. They could offer me a penny a word and I'd take it. I recommend staying away from American Handgunner. They are a GREAT 'zine to be sure, but they don't accept freelance articles with the occasional eception like that highschool student writing about the Beretta U22 NEOS. Also unless you either have experience as a professional writer or have a degree in english composition and research they won't consider hiring you on as a writer. Although I can't speak for the other mags out there(pun not intended). Combat handguns might be a good one. Same for special weapons for law enforcement, and guns and weapons for law enforcement. Those three are really the only main ones I know about aside from guns and ammo which everyone knows. Guns and Ammo and the other three might very well be willing to consider printing an article or two and if you get good reviews be willing to accept regular articles from you. Without a degree or experience though, it's tough to get into. A degree in journalism is also highly sought after.

Rev. Michael
 
The publishing business is the same regardless of the subject matter. It's worked the same way for years. It's highly unlikely, but not unheard of, to get material published by an unknown writer in a major publication. But you're best to start off in smaller, regional publications. You develop your style and credibility there eventually working your way up to larger publications. Typically though, you need a publishing agent working for you if you really want your work to be taken seriously by the bigger publishers. They just don't have the time and staff to review all the unsolicited articles they receive.

I worked as an editor for a period of time in technical publications, and here are the things (in priority order) that I graded on:

1) Is the subject of the article unique and appealing to a wide audience? Is it something new or just repackaging of an overused subject.
2) Are the ideas presented logically and backed up with clear examples that support the premise?
3) Is the article concise and to the point...no rambling?
4) Is the writer trying to "express" or "impress?" Impress goes in the garbage. Can I "hear" the writer talking the same way as they are writing?

Quite frankly, punctuation, spelling, run-on sentences and passive voices don't seem to bother me too much as those can be fixed. However, a lot of editors I know put a great emphasis on it as it's an indicator to them of your level of competence.

Bottom line, no matter how good you get at expressing yourself the key to success in getting published are novel and unique ideas. Unfortunately, that's not something you can learn in a classroom.
 
I don't think a journalism degree is anywhere near as important as the ability to write well, and interesting subjects to write about. Guns that usually don't get much notice can be a good place to start.

It's not really necessary to know people in the business to start selling gun articles either. I started with a magazine by writing a letter pointing out that they weren't covering guns.

I've met some gun editors and writers over the years, but most of the jobs I got I got on my own.
 
I'd recommend that you find (and read) a copy of "The Careful Writer" by Theodore Bernstein. While this was written primarily for the newspaper trade, it's full of really good info on writing - also, it's easy to read.

Your library will either have this or can get it for you, places like Amazon might also have used copies.

good luck,

Owen
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top