Fleetwood Captain said:
And there's no Smith like a "long-action" Smith.
Now I hate to admit this in public, but that's true. I have been trying to keep that secret for years but I guess he's let the cat out of the bag.
I've been trying to "put away" high condition "long action" S&Ws for the last few years. My best is an unfired 1947 M&P, one of the very last long actions. Guns like this will NEVER be made again and the discriminating buyer can still find them cheaply ($350 or less). N frame ones are not cheap, but K and I frame ones are still bargains relative to pre-model prices or model gun prices. The gun-buying public doesn't yet understand the value here. Now don't tell anyone else about this, OK?
mlaustin said:
Pre-86 transferable NFA machine guns.
There are multiple reasons to not want to go there as an investment at this moment. The paper work and tax stamp costs are not "high" barriers to entry to ownership, but they are still "barriers to entry" in the economic sense that keep a free market from happening.
Also, the current prices are predicated on the 1986 ban never being reversed. This was a great bet to make in c. 1987 and for years afterwards. But with
Heller now "on the books," it's questionable whether that ban will stand the long-term test. The GCA '34 might and the tax stamp, but much less likely the '86 act. So now you have substantial/serious political risk tied up in those guns as a pure investment. Serious "Political risk" is not a risk you can take on in something you view as an inflation hedge or safe investment.
This idea *might* prove a good investment overtime, but is a really bad piece of advice for the OP who was asking for an inflation hedge, not home-run risky investment ideas. I'm guessing you don't actually own a pre-'86 full-auto and realize what a risky investment those are right now. Or perhaps understand the idea of a "hedge" which is to offset risk, not take on more or to try to outperform.