Smoke
Member
Link to news network: http://www.myfoxdfw.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=3572773&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=3.2.1
Seems a critter (nod to Lawdog) was stealing a bunch of jewelry from an apartment complex. Neighbors seen man fleeing and try to stop. One neighbor fires a "warning shot" into the air. Critter stop and is detained. Cops arrive. Critter carted off.
Now, with out getting into the argument about 'warning shots", it seems that the polcie are saying "defense of property with a handgun is not allowed" (a view that is grey in TX penal code). The lawyer interviewed said he "could not find fault with the actions of the neighbor, considering the outcome."
Now since the heighbor who fired the gun was not ticketed, and the lawyer, could not find fault, why did the cops confiscate his firearm?
Anyone?
Smoke
Seems a critter (nod to Lawdog) was stealing a bunch of jewelry from an apartment complex. Neighbors seen man fleeing and try to stop. One neighbor fires a "warning shot" into the air. Critter stop and is detained. Cops arrive. Critter carted off.
Now, with out getting into the argument about 'warning shots", it seems that the polcie are saying "defense of property with a handgun is not allowed" (a view that is grey in TX penal code). The lawyer interviewed said he "could not find fault with the actions of the neighbor, considering the outcome."
Now since the heighbor who fired the gun was not ticketed, and the lawyer, could not find fault, why did the cops confiscate his firearm?
Anyone?
Smoke
Last edited: