Have u guys seen this yet??

Status
Not open for further replies.

CDignition

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2005
Messages
897
Location
Sarasota Florida
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-6257

GovTrack.us Logo
GovTrack.us
Tracking the 110th United States Congress

Bills Legislators Votes Track Congress / Log In Active Bills Recent Votes Learn More About GovTrack

Find:
Full Text Options
Download PDF
Full Text on THOMAS

[Email This Page] [Printer Friendly Page]
Legislation > 2007-2008 (110th Congress) > H.R. 6257
H.R. 6257: To reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act
Bill Status
Introduced: Jun 12, 2008
Sponsor: Rep. Mark Kirk [R-IL]
Status: Introduced
Go to Bill Status Page

You are viewing the following version of this bill:

Introduced in House: This is the original text of the bill as it was written by its sponsor and submitted to the House for consideration.
Text of Legislation

HR 6257 IH

110th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 6257

To reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 12, 2008

Mr. KIRK (for himself, Mr. CASTLE, Mr. FERGUSON, and Mr. SHAYS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Assault Weapons Ban Reauthorization Act of 2008’.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON MANUFACTURE, TRANSFER, AND POSSESSION OF CERTAIN SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS.

(a) RESTRICTION- Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding after subsection (u) the following:

‘(v)(1) It shall be unlawful for a person to manufacture, transfer, or possess a semiautomatic assault weapon.

‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any semiautomatic assault weapon otherwise lawfully possessed under Federal law on the date of the enactment of this subsection.

‘(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to--

‘(A) any of the firearms, or replicas or duplicates of the firearms, specified in appendix A to this section, as such firearms were manufactured on October 1, 1993;

‘(B) any firearm that--

‘(i) is manually operated by bolt, pump, lever, or slide action;

‘(ii) has been rendered permanently inoperable; or

‘(iii) is an antique firearm;

‘(C) any semiautomatic rifle that cannot accept a detachable magazine that holds more than 5 rounds of ammunition; or

‘(D) any semiautomatic shotgun that cannot hold more than 5 rounds of ammunition in a fixed or detachable magazine.

The fact that a firearm is not listed in appendix A shall not be construed to mean that paragraph (1) applies to such firearm. No firearm exempted by this subsection may be deleted from appendix A so long as this subsection is in effect.

‘(4) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to--

‘(A) the manufacture for, transfer to, or possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States (including the United States Armed Forces and, under regulations pursuant to title 50, United States Code, the National Guard and Reserve), or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State, or a transfer to or possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);

‘(B) the transfer to a licensee under title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 for purposes of establishing and maintaining an on-site physical protection system and security organization required by Federal law, or possession by an employee or contractor of such licensee on-site for such purposes or off-site for purposes of licensee-authorized training or transportation of nuclear materials;

‘(C) the possession, by an individual who is retired from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving a firearm, of a semiautomatic assault weapon transferred to the individual by the agency upon such retirement; or

‘(D) the manufacture, transfer, or possession of a semiautomatic assault weapon by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Secretary.’.

(b) DEFINITION OF SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPON- Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding after paragraph (29) the following:

‘(30) The term ‘semiautomatic assault weapon’ means--

‘(A) any of the firearms, or copies or duplicates of the firearms in any caliber, known as--

‘(i) Norinco, Mitchell, and Poly Technologies Avtomat Kalashnikovs (all models);

‘(ii) Action Arms Israeli Military Industries UZI and Galil;

‘(iii) Beretta Ar70 (SC-70);

‘(iv) Colt AR-15;

‘(v) Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR, and FNC;

‘(vi) SWD M-10, M-11, M-11/9, and M-12;

‘(vii) Steyr AUG;

‘(viii) INTRATEC TEC-9, TEC-DC9 and TEC-22; and

‘(ix) revolving cylinder shotguns, such as (or similar to) the Street Sweeper and Striker 12;

‘(B) a semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least 2 of--

‘(i) a folding or telescoping stock;

‘(ii) a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon;

‘(iii) a bayonet mount;

‘(iv) a flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor; and

‘(v) a grenade launcher;

‘(C) a semiautomatic pistol that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least 2 of--

‘(i) an ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip;

‘(ii) a threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer;

‘(iii) a shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned;

‘(iv) a manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded; and

‘(v) a semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm; and

‘(D) a semiautomatic shotgun that has at least 2 of--

‘(i) a folding or telescoping stock;

‘(ii) a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon;

‘(iii) a fixed magazine capacity in excess of 5 rounds; and

‘(iv) an ability to accept a detachable magazine.’.

(c) PENALTIES-

(1) VIOLATION OF SECTION 922(v)- Section 924(a)(1)(B) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘or (q) of section 922’ and inserting ‘(r), or (v) of section 922’.

(2) USE OR POSSESSION DURING CRIME OF VIOLENCE OR DRUG TRAFFICKING CRIME- Section 924(c)(1)(B)(i) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘or semiautomatic assault weapon,’ after ‘short-barreled shotgun,’.

(d) IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS FOR SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS- Section 923(i) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘The serial number of any semiautomatic assault weapon manufactured after the date of the enactment of this sentence shall clearly show the date on which the weapon was manufactured.’.

SEC. 3. BAN OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES.

(a) PROHIBITION- Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, as amended by section 2(a), is amended by adding after subsection (v) the following:

‘(w)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be unlawful for a person to transfer or possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device.

‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.

‘(3) This subsection shall not apply to--

‘(A) the manufacture for, transfer to, or possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States (including the United States Armed Forces and, under regulations pursuant to title 50, United States Code, the National Guard and Reserve), or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State, or a transfer to or possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);

‘(B) the transfer to a licensee under title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 for purposes of establishing and maintaining an on-site physical protection system and security organization required by Federal law, or possession by an employee or contractor of such licensee on-site for such purposes or off-site for purposes of licensee-authorized training or transportation of nuclear materials;

‘(C) the possession, by an individual who is retired from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving ammunition, of a large capacity ammunition feeding device transferred to the individual by the agency upon such retirement; or

‘(D) the manufacture, transfer, or possession of any large capacity ammunition feeding device by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Secretary.’.

‘(4) If a person charged with violating paragraph (1) asserts that paragraph (1) does not apply to such person because of paragraph (2) or (3), the Government shall have the burden of proof to show that such paragraph (1) applies to such person. The lack of a serial number as described in section 923(i) of title 18, United States Code, shall be a presumption that the large capacity ammunition feeding device is not subject to the prohibition of possession in paragraph (1).’.

(b) DEFINITION OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICE- Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, as amended by section 2(b), is amended by adding after paragraph (30) the following:

‘(31) The term ‘large capacity ammunition feeding device’--

‘(A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device manufactured after the date of enactment of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition; but

‘(B) does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.’.

(c) PENALTY- Section 924(a)(1)(B) of title 18, United States Code, as amended by section 2(c), is amended by striking ‘or (v)’ and inserting ‘(v), or (w)’.

(d) IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS FOR LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES- Section 923(i) of title 18, United States Code, as amended by section 2(d), is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘A large capacity ammunition feeding device manufactured after the date of the enactment of this sentence shall be identified by a serial number that clearly shows that the device was manufactured or imported after the effective date of this subsection, and such other identification as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe.’.

SEC. 4. STUDY BY ATTORNEY GENERAL.

(a) STUDY- The Attorney General shall investigate and study the effect of this Act and the amendments made by this Act, and in particular shall determine their impact, if any, on violent and drug trafficking crime. The study shall be conducted over a period of 18 months, commencing 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act.

(b) REPORT- Not later than 30 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall prepare and submit to the Congress a report setting forth in detail the findings and determinations made in the study under subsection (a).

SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act and the amendments made by this Act--

(1) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act; and

(2) are repealed effective as of the date that is 10 years after that date.

SEC. 6. APPENDIX A TO SECTION 922 OF TITLE 18.

Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following appendix:

‘APPENDIX A (Truncated)

This material is Open Knowlege
Open Source (OSI) Logo
GovTrack is not affiliated with the U.S. government or any other group. For more information, see About GovTrack. / This site is "copyleft". You are encouraged to reuse any material on this site. / Feedback (but not political opining) is welcome to [email protected], but I can't do your research for you, nor can I pass on messages to Members of Congress. This website is just a pet project of a regular joe. / GovTrack is open source and supports open knowledge. See the source page for more.
 
Yep. Its been posted a few times this week already.

These get proposed several times a year.

Nothing to get worked up about until they get out of committee, which none of them have yet.

Always a good idea to keep an eye on them but remember, members of Congress can introduce legislation pretty much anytime they want to.
It's when it leaves committee that the phone calls need to begin.

Could you break this down?

Another variation of an "AWB". They get proposed with some Congressman needs to show he's "doing something".

Kirk is up for re-election I believe I read just the other day in a thread on here.
 
the main changes I noticed off the bat is that they did a 'ban-by-name' amendment to it, require serial numbering on mags, attacks any shotgun bigger than rounds, etc.

it is basically the same bill, but with a few key amends to kill the importation scheme that was done to dupe the bill last time.

if I also read it right, then it still has the Oct. 1993 cut-off on it, which means that lot of our stuff made after the ban would suddenly become illegal? :scrutiny:

dead bill very soon.
 
Maybe his goal was to never get it passed, instead make it absurdly stupid and trick the anti-gun people to support him while not actually hurting gun owners.
 
wow, even the Republicans from Illinois are anti-gun.

although in this case, the guy is probably anti-gun because he has no conception of proper or lawful use of a firearm. As evidence, consider the following statement he made on the radio 3 days ago where he basically said that he supports a policy where, "if we see Obama there's a shoot-on-sight order."

Way to go, you don't know what lawful use of a firearm is, so you want to ban them!

Stop watching movies and get your head out of the sand.
 
Maybe his goal was to never get it passed, instead make it absurdly stupid and trick the anti-gun people to support him while not actually hurting gun owners.

Nah, Kirk is anti. This isn't the first time for him to play in this arena.

There was a thread on him here the other day.

From his website:

During the 10 years the assault weapons ban was in effect from 1994 to 2004, Kirk said violent crimes involving assault weapons dropped by more than 60 percent.

http://www.kirkforcongress.com/?q=contentview&c=42526
 
Yeah, Kirk, a republican from Illinois, introduced this bill. I think he'll be getting a letter from me very soon.

Texas, I guess the only crimes he cares about are those involving "assault weapons." So "assault weapons" used in crime dropped from 1% to .4%. What an incredibly large decrease. I hate statistics.
 
He represents the North Shore (aka Gold Coast) of Chicago and the northern suburbs. Limousine Liberals.

He's also a RINO. And a Naval Reserve officer. Someone needs to have him read a copy of the Constitution so that he can understand what he swore to "Preserve and Defend".....
 
Nah, Kirk is anti. This isn't the first time for him to play in this arena.

Hopefully he will continue to try to put through absurdly stupid legislation which will never get passed.
 
opefully he will continue to try to put through absurdly stupid legislation which will never get passed.

Oh he's one of those guys that doesn't care if it gets passed, just as long as the funding from George Soros doesn't dry up and he gets reelected.

He only ran as a Repub because it was the best chance of getting into office.

But you are right, he's a moron :)
 
"SEC. 4. STUDY BY ATTORNEY GENERAL.

(a) STUDY- The Attorney General shall investigate and study the effect of this Act and the amendments made by this Act, and in particular shall determine their impact, if any, on violent and drug trafficking crime. The study shall be conducted over a period of 18 months, commencing 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act.

(b) REPORT- Not later than 30 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall prepare and submit to the Congress a report setting forth in detail the findings and determinations made in the study under subsection (a)."

What we all think the outcome of this will be? This time I am not sure what he will say.
John
 
I am confused here...
Does the appendix list the guns they intend to BAN?
Holy Crap...can they really ban a 10/22 or the Remington 7600 or any gun made by norinco?

Does this mean a person that purchased something this year would need to turn it in? :what:

Hopefully I completely misinterpreted what I saw.

That said...
What do we, The THR members, actually do in a situation where something this absurd leaves committee?
Is there a formal political activity group where the effort to stop this is a coordinated effort?

NRA?

:confused:

Thanks for your patience, just a bit worried here.
 
I know he's doing it for some credit with the north shore base, and everyone thinks it will 'go nowhere'.

What if it does?

You know, a fluke 'perfect storm' and it gains ground.

And Heller may come down tomorrow.

Pathetic.
 
What if it does?

It's the second or third this year. This one is more wacky than the other.

It's not going anywhere. If it does get out of comittee it will never survive.
 
Last edited:
I am confused here...
Does the appendix list the guns they intend to BAN?
Holy Crap...can they really ban a 10/22 or the Remington 7600 or any gun made by norinco?
The Appendix is guns specifically not banned (most of them aren't even semi autos).

But yes, if they could get the votes and presidential signature, they could ban them all. Only a good supreme court ruling, and the executive branch enforcing that ruling could stop that.
 
Regardless of his intentions in proposing this bill, or it's chances of pasing, I wrote my Rep. and asked him to oppose this, and when he see's Rep. Kirk, to slap him on the back of the head and call him a jack*** for me.








:D
(ok, I made the last part up, but I did write. Better safe than sorry, right?)

I would have happily actually written the last part in my e-mail, but I could see someone considering that to be me threatening a congresscritter with violence, and getting me sent to Gitmo (but, at least I'd eventually get a trial now! :evil:)
 
mp510,
Thanks...I was stressing out for a while there.
I have 2 guns I can hunt with and BOTH were listed, I almost had a stroke...lol
 
Chron, it's really been Liberal as of late, I've seen literally hundreds of BHO diggs and literally about 4 decent Mccain stories in the past months.

edit: 800 diggs thus far, WOW, I was on digg for a bit earlier today and didn't see this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top