One 57 to another: walkalong has it right in that Blue Dot loads will typically require the highest charges across the board in .38 Special. There are also loads you'll find with 2400, H-110, W296 and IMR 4227, but not as commonly.
Blue Dot is fairly bulky, but I wouldn't call it a heavy powder. The unit of measurement to determine powder weight is bulk density. Example, the heaviest handgun propellant I'm aware of is AA#7 at 985 grams per liter. Not all manufacturers give bulk density. Accurate does, Ramshot does at their website and in past manuals. As far as metering precision, ball (flattened spherical) powders with high bulk density will also be the best metering, especially, combined with their small physical size. That doesn't necessarily mean that lighter powder won't meter easily, but some with large physical grain size can make it more of a chore, i.e. 800-X. If you have the LEE dippers, and I've had them around, mostly unused for about 25 years, but the 1cc measure will allow you to determine bulk density fairly easy with your scale. The conversion from grains to grams is .0648, Grains multiplied by .0648 to get grams.
Not that I don't use Blue Dot, or other extruded flake powders, but they are typically lighter in bulk density vs. their ball powder counterparts. This is also why some flake powders will give decent case fill with lower chargeweight. Some ball powders have fairly low bulk densities as well, like a flake powder. AA#2 is an example at .650/cc, or 650 grams per liter depending on how the powder co. measures them.
Load density is a bit limited by the .38 Special case, and its low pressure rating. One reason many don't bother with it and use light charges of fast burners. Nothing wrong with either method and personally, I like high load density wherever possible, particularly in auto loader cartridges, i.e. AA#7 in 9mm. Economy is usually the determining factor here. I wish there was plentiful data for #7 in .38 Sp. but there are some cases where a great powder isn't suitable for a particular cartridge. #7 would be a good ball powder equivalent to compare to Blue Dot in this case. Conversely, if using low charge weight loads in .38 Special, those that are insensitive to powder positioning make a lot of sense, i.e. Titegroup, AA#2, Ramshot ZIP.
Hodgdon gave data for HS-7 at one time, and with the absence of data for AA#7, some fairly heavy powders you're most likely to find .38 Special load data for are HS-6, AA#5 and Ramshot True Blue, but load density won't be near 100%, so, Blue Dot may be what you want, but be aware, there are better metering powders. One reason I though I'd give some background on this very good topic.