- Joined
- Oct 21, 2005
- Messages
- 2,796
In his defense of handguns in D.C. vs. Heller, Guru agreed that "reasonable restrictions" are ok and that it's ok to ban machine guns, plastic guns (to avoid metal detectors), armored piercing bullets and other things.
If we WIN and the individual right is decided upon obviously other cases are going to be brought up to the courts, ie. machinegun ban and so forth.
Since we are now on the record saying that the 2nd Amendment does not protect machine guns, plastic guns and certain types of bullets, how can we go right back to court and say, "Nope, we were wrong in D.C. vs. Heller, machine guns and plastic pistols should be allowed?
If we WIN and the individual right is decided upon obviously other cases are going to be brought up to the courts, ie. machinegun ban and so forth.
Since we are now on the record saying that the 2nd Amendment does not protect machine guns, plastic guns and certain types of bullets, how can we go right back to court and say, "Nope, we were wrong in D.C. vs. Heller, machine guns and plastic pistols should be allowed?