Help in determining which one of three rifles to buy

Status
Not open for further replies.

ojibweindian

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
2,469
Location
Union Grove, Alabama
All

I've run across three rifles that have piqued my interest.

1st is an Interarms Mk X (Manchester England) in 7mm Rem. Mag. Walnut stock with nice stain and no unsightly blemishes, black fore-end tip (assuming it's ebony), bore is shiney, no obvious wear at the throat. Blueing is easily 85% - 90%. Asking price is $349.99

2nd is a Savage 110 (pre-accutrigger) in 7mm Rem Mag. It's a typical 110; dark grey synthetic stock, etc. Bore is shiney, no rust anywhere. Asking price is $288.

3rd is a new Marlin XL7 in 30-06. This one has the best trigger of the three. The rifle is brand new and the asking price is $310.

Of these three, which would be the better deal?
 
The Interarms Mk X by far.

Aftermarket Timmney triggers are cheap.

It dont really get much better than Mauser 98.
 
I've got pretty much all the bases covered. Already have a 7mm Rem Mag, and a 30-30, which, in Alabama, is all I'd ever need.

This next rifle will be a back-up to the 7 Mag.
 
I really like the commercial 98-pattern Mauser's, but I like the .30-'06 more than the 7mmRM. Tough call. You've already got ammo for the 7... Go for the Mark X.
 
Seems logical for any "back-up rifle" for your 7mag. to also be 7mag. and I don't see any reason to add a third caliber to your stable for a rifle that's just a back-up.

I would lean toward the Interarms just because of the walnut stock.


:cool:
 
Shawnee

That walnut stock is pretty, that's for sure.

Anyways, still waffling between the Mark X and the Savage. XL7's pretty much out of the game, because I don't really feel like buying the brass and bullets to feed it, especially when the performance differences between the Big 7 and the 30-06 are marginal at the distances deer and hog are shot at around here (100-150 yards), and because I've already got plenty of Big 7 components.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top