Help me scope my new 700 Police .223

Status
Not open for further replies.
M

mmike87

Member
Joined
May 24, 2004
Messages
911
Location
Charlottesville, VA
Hunting for a scope seems tougher than hunting for the rifle.

Here are the requirements:

1) Target shooting and post-apocolyptic Zombie sniping :D
2) Weight is not too important. I'll be shooting from a bipod primarily and this is not a hunting rifle.
3) Variable power. My range has primarily 100 yard rifle ranges, but I don't want to limit myself to just short range. I was thinking 3 x 9 power or something close to that range.
4) Probably a 40mm objective lense. Don't want something that site really high on the rifle, but want a bright image even at max magnification.
5) Good warranty and customer service.
6) Rugged. It's not a hunting rifle but I don't want to have to baby it, either.

These are what I have considered:

http://www.riflescopes.com/products/6525/nikon_3-9x40_monarch_ucc_riflescope.htm

http://www.riflescopes.com/products/LEU55046/leupold_3.5-10x40_vx-iii_riflescope.htm

http://www.riflescopes.com/products/5214609943/zeiss_3-9x40_conquest_rifle_scope.htm

Thoughts?
 
I had an older Vari-X III 3.5-10 AO that was a very clear scope. When I sent it in for target knob installation, Leupold found it had a bent tube and offered to replace it with the current model closest in price and specifications. I ended up with a VX2 4-12 AO. Good "customer service" as they say.

I think parallax adjustment and big graspable visible target knobs for windage and elevation are worth paying for but then a friend has gotten me interested in Long Range shooting and stuff like that matters at 600 yards and out.
 
Here's another question. What do I need to mount to scope to a Rem 700? It's "drilled and tapped" for scope mounting - but there seems to be a broad price range in scope mounting hardware.
 
Leupold is my preference. On my PSS in 223 I have the 6.5-20X50 LRT. I like having more magnification on a target rifle than 3-9 or 3.5-10. Makes it a lot easier to see those small 22 caliber bullet holes. Especially if you ever shoot at ranges longer than 100 yards.

Edit: If you get the Leupold from swfa, you'll see a drop down menu below the scope description. It says 'select your free gift', and in there you can get standard rings and bases included. They also give free shipping for Leupold scopes. I use the leupy rings and bases a lot and think they're very good.
 
Gunrunner said:
Leupold is my preference. On my PSS in 223 I have the 6.5-20X50 LRT. I like having more magnification on a target rifle than 3-9 or 3.5-10. Makes it a lot easier to see those small 22 caliber bullet holes. Especially if you ever shoot at ranges longer than 100 yards.

Edit: If you get the Leupold from swfa, you'll see a drop down menu below the scope description. It says 'select your free gift', and in there you can get standard rings and bases included. They also give free shipping for Leupold scopes. I use the leupy rings and bases a lot and think they're very good.
Click to expand...

Maybe my choice of magnification is coming out of my deer hunting days. I am new to rifle target shooting.
 
OK, bases and rings are confusing me.

I was looking at the Leupold Mark 4 bases and rings. They look pretty solid and are pricey IMO, but not the most expensive.

I was looking at the Burris Black Diamond scopes, and the rings and bases they suggest are about $70 total. Seems like a pretty big difference.

Can someone please shed some light here? I'm not cheap and don't mind spending $200 to get real good stuff - but is it really better or just more expensive?

Edit:

Looking at the Burris Black Diamond scope, if I wanted the Leupold Rings aqnd Base (Mark 4) how do you know what height rings to get? They have charts for looking up THEIR scopes cross referenced to THEIR rings, which is not of much help. Match it with a scope of the same objective diameter from Leuopold?
 
Bases: Get a one piece. It's a much stronger, "straighter" mount for your scope. Warne sells a good one for about $90. It's a picatinny rail, you can use "Weaver" stlye rings.
Rings: Use Weaver stlye on your picatinny rail. There are lots of choices out there. Here's Warnes.
You can spend more money on a base and rings, but these should work well for benchrest zombie sniping.
Scope: Weaver Classic 4-16x42 was recommended to me by several people for it's great quality for a good price. 16 power along with the fine crosshair will let you hit zombies way, way out. I ordered Warnes Medium height rings for my 42mm scope.

This should be a good set up. At least I hope it is, I just ordered it for my new Savage 10FP. ;)
 
Here is what I am looking at right now. Based on feedback I got here and elsewhere, I upped the magnification some, and that seemed to come with a bigger objective, too. Both the Leuopold and Burris BD's all come highly regarded, so I picked the Burris because it's a tiny bit less expensive and I don't like the gold ring on the Leo. Good reason? Hey, I figure I can't go wrong with either, so what the hell.

002K Butler Creek Lens Caps $15.95 $15.95
626033 Burris 50mm Black Diamond Sun Shade $19.95 $19.95
200926 Burris 4-16x50 Black Diamond 30mm Rifle Scope $579.95 $579.95
LEU50040 Leupold Mark 4 1 Piece Base $89.95 $89.95
420585 Burris Signature Zee 30mm Rings $52.95 $52.95
SBRM Harris Ultralight Bipod BRMS Series S $89.95 $89.95

Midway seemed to be out of the Warne rings and bases for short action 700's - and the Leo base was about the same price. I chose the Burris Sig Zee rings because I liked the idea of the insert in the rings, and they were a tad less expensive and still seem very well regarded. The Burris rings are "Extra High" which is what their chart said to select for their BD 4-16 scopes.

What do y'all think? Should I sign on the line which is dotted and do this? Will all these pieces work together?
 
Friend of mine has a big Burris that is very unimpressive.
Learn to like the gold ring.
The Burris ball and socket rings are very handy. If your rifle is drilled and tapped crooked they will prevent stress on the tube. The offset inserts can correct for misalignment and add elevation if you should want to shoot at longer range than a 1" tube scope will adjust for.
 
The only scope I would ever recommend is Leupold. WHY? Because it's the only brand that sits on top of all my rifles ensuring my shots, knowing I have good quality vision in the rain or fog, full lifetime gaurantee which I have never used nor anybody I know with Leupold scopes (the guy at the "full lifetime gaurantee" desk must be pretty bored:D), and mainly because of my experiences with other scopes, except for a few of course. Grab the Leupold. You won't regret looking back at all those dammed hours you worked for some optic(s) sitting behind a glass frame at your local gun/outdoor sports store. Besides, you get what you pay for right?
 
Is a 40mm objective big enough for a 20x scope? The Burris BD's are all 50mm at SWFA, however most of the Leos are 40mm.

Also - the Leo Mark 4 scope are in the same price range as the VX-III's - how would they compare?
 
FWIW..

as with others here, I have opinions. Mine are based on 40 years of using rifles/shotguns/scope combinations

Burris was supposedly started by a guy that left Leupold to make better scopes. Burris have metal internal parts, Leupold is plastic. Either would work fine, as would the lower end Zeiss, etc. I have both Leupold and Burris.

Larger optics mean the scope has to be mounted higher. In my experience (which is rather substantial), you almost have to take the rifle to a local shop and find the correct base height. If your bases are too high, it's difficult to get a good cheek weld for target shooting.

I've got Leupld QD rings on my muzzle loader. You can remove and re-install the scope and maintain zero. Just something else to confuse you.

If I were doing it, I'd probably get the Leo or Burris scope, Zee rings, and Butler Creek caps

I'm not a fan of Weaver style rings. I currently have them on my slug gun, and the scope slips between shots. May be OK for light recoil, but if you've got a major caliber it may be a concern
 
OK ...

The Burris is out. Although both the Burris and Leos have good reps, upon further research the Leos just seem to have an almost flawless reputation.

That said ... I'll further complicate the issue. Since I am in the $700 range now, what about the Zeiss Conquest scopes? How do they compare to the Leos?

Consider: http://www.riflescopes.com/products/5214909920/zeiss_4.5-14x50_conquest_rifle_scope.htm

Also, what's the deal with 30mm vs. 1" - does it matter? Do I care?
 
I don't know anything about the American Zeiss, but the specs look good and side knob parallax correction is more convenient than an adjustable objective.

In general, 30mm tube scopes have a wider range of adjustment, which is needed if you shoot at long ranges. Most 1" scopes will not have enough adjustment to get to 1000 yards; which is why you see advertisements for "tapered" scope bases that add 20 MOA or more of elevation. A 1" scope is usually ok up to 600 yards in a flat mount; that is only about 15 MOA above the 100 yd zero for my '06. But it is 22 MOA more to 1000 yards and my VX2 won't do it, so I have a tapered base. Now I can't get down to a 100 yard zero but that does not matter much, I only shoot the gun at Long Range F-Class and all it has to do is move between 600 and 1000 yard settings.
 
The zeiss conquest is supposed to be the best value in optics in their price range on the market. Or so i hear.

BTW, if your setting it up for tactical, look at something like a Leupold Mk 4 scope. You can get the 4.5-16x50 in the 7-800 dollar range. The mark 4's are on mose every precision rifle on the Arfcom precision rifle section.
 
Loopies are great scopes.

I have a bunch of Leupolds on my rifles. However, on a tip from the benchrest crowd, this 700PSS in .308 Winchester integrated quite nicely with a Sightron SII 4-16x42 MilDot:

700pssbenchirc.gif

I've never been happier with a scope/rifle combination. The rifle's pretty happy too:

700pss168grmatchking100yds.gif

A 700 PSS in .223 doesn't need a behemoth of a scope...
 
mmike87 said:
Also, what's the deal with 30mm vs. 1" - does it matter? Do I care?
Click to expand...


30mm is larger than 1". 30mm tubes let more light in and are generally considered to be a better design than 1" tubes.
 
One more thing:

If you are seriously looking at $700 glass, may as well go whole hog, spend a few hundred more and get a Nite Force or US Optics.
 
If you're going to be trying for the utmost in group size, go for the 6.5x20. If nothing else, you won't have to spend money on a spotting scope. ;)

I have a Leupold 6.5x20x50mm on my 700 Police .308, and it does not sit too high to get a good cheek weld. Another rifle I owned sported a 6.5x20x40mm Leupold. The extra 10mm means some extra shooting time when the sun starts going down.

If $$$ are a concern, why not look for a good used scope? Or for a really good deal? I found my 6.5x20x50mm new in box on gunbroker.com for $450 from a dealer going out of business.
 
It's the original stock from Remington.

Gewehr98- what kind of stock is that?
Click to expand...

The 700 PSS didn't always come in flat black. H-S Precision makes that 700 PSS stock in several different colors, and law enforcement agencies can order their rifles from Remington in whatever color's available, hence an olive green w/black web 700 PSS. :D

H-S Precision color choices:

http://www.hsprecision.com/pst59.htm
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

I
  • Locked
Rifle Scope help.
Replies
10
Views
599
ID_shooting
I
I
  • Locked
Best tactical scope for the money?
Replies
21
Views
4K
billcavazos
B
JonB
  • Locked
Short Scope for AR
Replies
8
Views
487
AK103K
AK103K
S
  • Locked
Choosing Leupold Scope: 3x9-40 or 4-12x40 ?
Replies
12
Views
5K
itgoesboom
I
B
  • Locked
Low power scopes: rifle vs shotgun models
Replies
17
Views
2K
Maverick223
Maverick223
Back
Top