Henry .357 Lever Action

[CaliCoastie]

ArchAngel, the redfield scopes are compley different, they say that redfield has a heratige but that they are now part of Leupolds family...

 

[ArchAngelCD]

Wow. I didn't know a discussion about a obsolete 150 year old gun could generate so much emotion...

You did when you made a false statement about Henrys connections to the original rifles.

Even if I'm wrong that wouldn't make my "statement" false, it would make it incorrect. I do not appreciate being called a lair. It doesn't matter you played word games by saying I made false statements, that calling them lies.

I truly wish I could tell you exactly what I think about what you are doing here but that would get me in trouble with the Mods. Do not ever call me a liar again unless you are willing to do so face to face instead of behind the safety of your computer screen. You can now talk to yourself in this thread because I'm done here. I won't continue be insulted in a forum over a stupid rifle and it has nothing to do with the 150 year old rifle, it's all about how you talk to people...

 

[doc2rn]

I have a couple of other Henry's and mine all show significant wear on the brass receiver. I opted for the Marlin which also comes in stainless but I got the blued. I think the Marlin just shoots better.

 

[Art Eatman]

From the OP: "How durable is the finish on the brass recievers? Is it easy to damage. Does it hold up to regular range sessions? I typically lean towards stainless steel for the look and durability.

If you own one, do you have any regrets? Would you buy one?"

I guess about all the on-topic answers are done.

Sorta like this thread.