Home defense gun for non-shooter

Status
Not open for further replies.
a ruger Mk2 in .22 LR. (assuming they don't like shotguns or revolvers)


it's easy to make safe if you don't have a round chambered, has mild recoil and easy to shoot.

for a complete neophyte, it's probably better than a 1911.
 
I must jump in on the side of the 4" wheel gun, 38/357 being the most common option.

Not to pick, but some of the responses to the question suggest that a hand gun is somehow less suitable than a shot gun, and since the new shooter won't train that he must be better off without a hand gun.

If he isn't willing to put in that modest amount of effort to get and stay proficient, I would encourage him to reconsider purchasing a handgun.

What "emergency car" for someone who doesn't drive?

What first-aid-kid for someone who will not practice his/her skills?

What good are tools you don't know how to use properly?

I don't understand that reasoning, I though the majority of handgun owners have not shot one in years (present company excluded), should they not have them either?

Please explain these handgun complexities to me.

ehenz
 
I don't understand that reasoning, ...
I'm not saying you shouldn't have a handgun for emergencies if you aren't willing to train with it, I just don't see the point of buying tools which need some degree of proficiency to be effective and then not practising with them to develop this necessary proficiency. To me such a purchase would simply be a waste of money.
 
Ditto. To quote Jeff Cooper, "It has long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully."
 
Pump Shotgun hands down!



... Not you keep your damn hands up!! :)


HS/LD
 
But what about someone who wants a defensive handgun, but is only going to go to the range once a month or so?

What "emergency car" for someone who doesn't drive? What first-aid-kid for someone who will not practise his/her skills? What good are tools you don't know how to use properly?

Practice shooting once a month plus previous shooting experience seems like it's better than most gun owners. With kids and work, thats about all I get out these days. How often do you all get out shooting?

I do suggest your friend take a defensive shooting training course to cover both the tactics and legalites of home defense. A 99 cent "Beware of Dog" sign (even if you don't have a dog) and $20/year in electricity leaving on a few lights can be an excellent defense.

The .357 wheelgun is an excellent gun with a lot of options from .38 Special wadcutters on up to .357 hunting loads, but a revolver still requires a lot of skill to handle safely if it's your only defense.

There are a lot of folks here with more experience, but IMHO a Glock is an easier to learn gun than a revolver for home defense. Easy operation, longer trigger pull than a 1911 plus the option to leave it in Condition 3 with a full magazine and no rounds in the chamber (no boom if you accidently grab by the trigger at 3am). Rack the slide and you're ready. Ditto for a pump shotgun.
 
Handgun wise, I would go with a .38 revolver, with barrels at 3". A Ruger SP101 would do the job. Plenty of great old S&Ws out there too. 4" barrels are okay too, but if you had to go outside and conceal it, it is a bit too big.

Shotgun wise, go with a .20 gauge, like the Winchester Defender. Cheap. Almost as effective as a .12 gauge, and a lot easier to shoot. I am a big believer in the .20 gauge shotgun as a home defender. Go with #3 shot magnums.

If you are a neophyte, stay away from semi-autoloaders.
 
Someone mentioned a S&W 4" Model 10 .38 spl. For a house gun in the hands of an occassional shooter - that's got to be just about the perfect choice. Normally I would say get a .357. But if they really aren't "into" shooting, why complicate things? The S&W M-10 is of a size and weight that will fit most anyone. There isn't a factory loaded .38 around that would be brutal to shoot in that particular gun. If for inside the house use, a .357 would likely be too much any way.

In my opinion, an auto loader of any type would be out of the question. In the hands of those that shoot them a lot - they are fine. But for the novice - too complicated and too many opportunities for bad results.
 
A lot of people who own guns have not shot them in years. That doesn't make them a non-shooter, however. That being said, I think they are probably kidding themselves if they are counting on effectively using a handgun in self defense that they have not shot in years. They might do fine, but from what I have seen of people who have not shot in years, especially those who didn't shoot much anyway, they don't do that well. I have seen some of the folks qualifying for a Texas CHL that had to unload the hollowpoints from their gun that they loaded in 4 years prior when they last qualified. Even at 3 yards, they get some wild bad shots and the qualification shoot isn't high pressure at all.

I would not suggest people should not be allowed to have guns if they haven't shot in years or don't shoot at all. I am just saying that I would put more stock into me performing a tracheotomy on a person with a collapsed airway like I have seen done on TV on the Lifetime network than I would on the non-shooter doing well under stress, say in a home invasion scenario. By the way, I am an archaeologist, not and MD.
 
Training is good, and highly recommended.

HOWEVER,

Has anyone besides me ever read a headline such as :

"Little Old Lady Shoots Would-Be Rapist"?

Well, I doubt she is a graduate of LFI, Thunder Ranch, or even the Boy Scouts.

Pick up a copy of American Rifleman sometime, and you will see plenty of similar stories where people who are untrained, poorly trained, and generally non-enthusiasts have successfully defended themselves from mortal danger.

It is better to be untrained and armed, than trained and unarmed.
 
Shotgun, preferably 20 ga with #2 or 4 buckshot if recoil-sensitive.

Though 12 ga with #4 buck would also recoil lightly and can be used confidently by the weaker members of your household. Train them to use it too, obviously.

Otherwise, a 3-4" 38 spl revolver would be a good choice, Sp-101 or GP-100 comes to mind ;)
 
Agree with everyone else with a 4-inch .38 Special, but I would say in stainless instead of blue so it would be one less thing to worry about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top