Honoring the Boycott

Status
Not open for further replies.
Many thanks for the kind word's Alan! :D You've known
me for a long, long time; and with that said, you also
know that I will stand on my own two feet for what I
believe is right. :uhoh: :D

Like our friend Silver Bullet said, our belief's do not
make us evil; its just that we are opinionated . It also
doesn't make either of us wrong; as the pendulum often
times swings both ways.

Wishing All A Happy, Safe, & Joyous Holiday Season! ;)
Ala Dan, N.R.A. Life Member
 
Pro-Gun politics first, Anti-Gun-Manf politics last.

Sorry, but if I disagree with a firearm manufacturers dealings re RKBA, I will write them expressing my opinion and reasons behind it.
But I'm not going to shoot the whole issue of gun ownership in the foot via the fratricide of attacking a gun manf's bottom line.
 
I think its silly. I thought a person's decision on purchasing a product (or a gun) was based on quality and price not on the politics of that company. If I'm saving-up to buy a Colt, S&W or Ruger I really don't care about who owns the company, their religious or political beliefs. Its a business deal, no more no less. If I'm a stockholder, I expect the company to do whats required to stay in business and make a profit. Some of you are passing the buck, if you don't like the laws or the firearms environment YOU work to change the situation, don't expect a corporation to do your dirty work for you. Its lazyness on your part. If I can afford a 1st rate gun, guess what, I'm getting it no matter what!
 
"It's laziness on your part."

My position on boycotting, then, is a personal one. It's possible that you don't understand New Jersey. Don't feel bad - neither do I. Focusing on the company's bottom line is the only option here, in my opinion. Changing the laws isn't an option for now. Changing the laws to improve the horrific school funding problems isn't even an option so changing the gun laws in the liberal epicenter of the universe certainly isn't. Maybe it is in the very long term, but Taurus has teamed up with the "enemy". Maybe it's not possible to grasp the concept unless you live here.
Someone's got to take a firm stand. It may, in fact, be too late, but integrity is more important to me than the mythical "bottom line". Standing up for what's right is the bottom line where good business is concerned.
We all know the facts. Each of us will make up our own minds.
Boycott Taurus. Boycott Taurus. Boycott Taurus...
 
Ala Dan: if you wouldn't give money to a company (oh sorry, a firearms company) that supported terrorists, why would you give money to a company that supports defecating on our freedom? :confused: We all have a lot more to fear from our overbearing Nanny State than we do from a bunch of ignorant goatherders.

And you still haven't answered the question about a firearms company supporting things that are morally repugnant (Aryan Nation or child porn rings in Europe) but not related to terrorism. So I'll ask again.
Would you give your money to a company that donated a significant portion of it's profits to the Aryan Nation?

A simple yes/no question. Thanks for answering.
 
Att: Balog-

If all the indicator's proved beyond a shadow of doubt
that a firearms company supported the likes of the
Arryan Nation, KKK, or as you say "a child porn scheme
based in Europe"; then quite frankly the answer would
be NO, I wouldn't support their cause.

If you have any concrete proof of such action's
by any company I would love to hear the story; and
especially if its a firearms related company?

Thanks for tuning in ! :D

Best Wishes,
Ala Dan, N.R.A. Life Member
 
Ala Dan: Thank you for answering. I'm a bit confused tho.
Why is supporting the Aryan Nation worse than supporting the socialists (Clinton Feinstein etc etc) who would disarm us?
I'm sure you've read the text of S&W's agreement w/ HUD, correct? You are aware that it has never been repudiated? While it's not being enforced, it certainly could be. And of course they still put those vexing little locks on 'em.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top