how much velocity do you gain from it?
the reason I ask is I'm curious how much velocity one would actually gain from a conventional rifled 6" barrel in a Glock 20.
It does seem low, but remember that polygonal rifling is usually faster than conventional rifling (better seal, I believe), any velocity you'd gain from the longer length would first have to off-set that lost
The figure I've seen used is a 3% gain in polygonal barrels, however, not all barrels are equal. The quality and process of the machining varies greatly among both conventional and polygonal barrels. A match grade conventional barrel may be close to or as well sealed as a polygonal tube.
Steven Camp wrote this Sig 225 test, in which he purposely compares it to a Glock of similar ilk. Excellent article. The comparison is near the end. The results seem to indicate that the polygonal does offer higher velocity, if only slightly. http://actionsbyt.blogspot.com/2008/05/stephen-camp-sig-sauer-p225.html
The main benefit to me with polygonal rifling is easier cleaning. The fouling seems to scrub off noticeably easier with polygonal rifling. There is only a marginal increase in velocity (the manufacturers really exaggerate this too much). Better accuracy? There are so many other more important factors that effect accuracy I have a hard time believing it really makes a difference. It's more of a marketing ploy. I wouldn't feel more compelled to buy a gun just because it had polygonal rifling.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.