Human shields await bombs in Baghdad

Status
Not open for further replies.

2dogs

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,865
Location
the city
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/03/18/MN183497.DTL

Human shields await bombs in Baghdad

From anarchists to Quakers, they've followed their principles to put their lives on the line with the civilians of Iraq

Rob Collier, Chronicle Staff Writer Tuesday, March 18, 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Baghdad -- The ultimatum issued by President Bush on Monday dramatically increases the chance that Faith Fippinger may die in the next few days.

Fippinger, a 52-year-old retired schoolteacher is one of about 90 "human shields" who are putting their bodies on the line in front of potential U.S. bombing targets in Iraq.

Since early February, the Sarasota, Fla., native has slept every night at the Daura oil refinery, a huge complex at the southern edge of Baghdad that supplies the entire metropolitan region with gasoline and other fuels. In the 1991 Persian Gulf War, the refinery was destroyed by U.S. missiles, and it burned for a month and a half.

Fippinger expects another attack.

"I may die here," she said calmly. "But my death is no more or less important than the Iraqi lives that will be lost -- for example, my neighbors, who live next to the refineries, a woman who brings in tea every morning."

Then Fippinger broke into tears.

Together with other human shields from the United States and elsewhere, Fippinger hopes her body might yet clog the gears of war.

But while Pentagon planners reportedly want to avoid bombing civilian infrastructure targets, Gen. Tommy Franks, the U.S. commander of the military campaign, has said potential targets would not necessarily be spared just because of the presence of human shields.

The volunteers are organized loosely by Human Shields, a London organization that is an ungainly conglomeration of 23 nationalities, mostly Europeans and Turks, along with six Americans.

The organization has been riven with dissension. Last month, the Iraqi government expelled five of its leaders after a dispute over which sites would be guarded by the volunteers. The group's leaders wanted to position shields at sites such as hospitals, while the government proposed sites it viewed as more strategic, including military installations. Other shields have returned home and denounced the Iraqi government as repressive.


'SOME FRUITCAKES AMONG US'
"We have a bad impression of the human shields. Some of them are crazy," said an Iraqi Foreign Ministry official, who requested anonymity.

"Yes, there are some fruitcakes among us," said Marc Eubanks, a Wyoming native and Air Force veteran who now lives in Athens, Greece. He was referring to some anarchists, who he said could provoke major culture clashes with Iraqi officials at joint meetings.

"But nobody can tell me that we haven't been an outstanding success," said Eubanks, who has been living at the Dura Electrical Power Plant, which supplies a third of Baghdad's electricity and was bombed in the Gulf War. "We were poorly organized, but we lurched forward."

The Bush administration has said little about the human shields. In February, a State Department spokeswoman responded to a reporter's question about why they were in Iraq by saying, "You might as well ask me why moths fly into porch lights."


NUMBERS UNCERTAIN
It is unclear exactly how many foreign activists are in Iraq, because even at this late date, many are still entering and leaving the country. But organizers estimate there may be about 120 to 150 activists in Baghdad when the U.S. attack starts.

Although the human shields are under no obligation to remain once the war begins, most say they will stay put even when the bombs start falling.

For the American activists, a lingering question is: What happens if they survive the war? Once they return to the United States, will they be prosecuted under the U.S. Patriot Act for supporting the enemy?

"The truth is, I'm more afraid of what the Americans would do if they caught me," said Eubanks. "The Americans will probably make Camp X-ray here and put me in it," he said, referring to the U.S. POW camp in Guantanamo, Cuba,

that is holding accused al Qaeda members.

As a U.S. war draws ever closer, the disappointment felt by the remaining activists is palpable.

"More than a letdown, it's a catastrophe, a huge punishment heaped on innocent people," said Kathy Kelly, the coordinator of Voices in the Wilderness, an activist group with headquarters in Chicago and London.

In recent months, Voices in the Wilderness and other U.S. groups, most of whom share Voices' origin in liberal Catholic, Quaker and other religious groups, have held many vigils in Baghdad and other Iraqi cities.


TENSIONS AMONG GROUPS
Kelly hinted at the subtle tension between her organization and Human Shields. While Voices in the Wilderness and other Western activist groups have accepted no aid from the Iraqi government, lodging and food expenses for the human shields has been paid for by the regime.

"We don't want to be under the propaganda wing of the party," said Kelly. "We are independent."

"I respect the human shields," but I wouldn't want to be taking anything from the government," said Charlie Liteky, a San Franciscan who is a member of Voices in the Wilderness. Liteky won the Congressional Medal of Honor in 1968 for his work as an Army chaplain in Vietnam, when he pulled 22 wounded soldiers out of a firefight against the Viet Cong.

"But in the end, we're all waiting for the same bombs," Liteky said. "And we may be in the same jail together after the war."
 
"We have a bad impression of the human shields. Some of them are crazy," said an Iraqi Foreign Ministry official, who requested anonymity.
That one actually made me laugh out loud.


Although the human shields are under no obligation to remain once the war begins, most say they will stay put even when the bombs start falling.

Um...if bombs are falling, your cause has failed.

Oh well...I liked the moth quote.
 
Madame Flippinger will not clog the gears of war; she will experience the joy and wonder of a Mark 84 airbursting 100 feet overhead.
 
Do you think maybe some of those "Human Shields" are thinking "Where is Hanoi Jane Fonda when ya really need her?"
And will she bring Marty Sheen with her?
 
What are they thinking?

Even if these confused individuals(the kindest term I could come up with)stood in front of an Iraqi, do they really believe their body would stop the bullets or bombs or cause the Allied Military to spare a target? In addition to being "moths" and traitors, they have to be completely insane!

:what:
 
But my death is no more or less important than the Iraqi lives that will be lost

If she knows this to be true, then why does the moron think she has an impact?
 
As far as I am concened they are Iraqis now. We shouldn't take them back. Maybe they can emmigrate to North Korea after this and live under the type of government they want for us.
 
Other shields have returned home and denounced the Iraqi government as repressive.
I love this stuff. I swear, you could not have made this up if you tried.

This is what happens when natural selection is prevented from operating in the population. This 'human shield' business is an unholy critical mass Darwinian readjustment. Nature has been prevented from weeding these retards out of the gene pool by the nanny state romper room nerf-world, which keeps them alive by holding Darwin at bay. So instead of drowning or getting run over by a bus or licking a light socket or something, they have managed to plod along relatively unscathed until they finally get to put on this bizarre Darwinian spectacle for the whole world to see.

Nature is about to let them know who's boss.

"What this world needs is a 20 foot long flying predator."
- unknown

- Gabe
 
I fundamentally distrust anyone who is committed to die for a cause. Fighting for a cause is fine, willingness to die helplessly for it is ridiculous.
It's chlorine in the gene pool.
 
What would be nice is send a data link Walleye television guided bomb in their direction. Then the look on their face just prior to impact would be recorded. Perhaps attach a strobe light to the weapon to get them looking in the right direction.
 
I think it's great that, unlike many of the mealy-mouthed publicity hounds on both sides of this issue, these people have the strength of conviction to take this stand.

The fact that I personally think they're wrong on the issue is a different matter.

-0-

Poodleshooter, tell it to Nathan Hale.
 
These "human shield" folks remind me of all the mass whale beachings from a few years ago. It was like a silent message of protest or something. Except whales are noble creatures and their statement will be remembered.

I will remember these "human shields" for all of a few m....

...a few....

...what were we talking about?

:p
 
Last edited:
I am sure the Iraqis have enough sense to head for a bunker when they hear the bombs going off. These 'human shields' actually just stand there? YGBSM:rolleyes:
 
HUMAN SHIELDS

If they are stupid enough to go and stand in front of a bulldozer or a bomb, then they have done the world and favor and raised the collective human IQ by eradicating themselves from the gene pool.

The only place these folks will get sympathy from me is in the dictionary between s--t and syphilis.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top