Husband stabs wife to death, had to wait

Status
Not open for further replies.

ALS

Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2004
Messages
226
Location
PA
What is not in these stories is the Husband was threatening her at work just one hour before. Her Job is three blocks from home. That night it was just her and the co-worker working at the business. Her co-worker kept answering the phone and hanging up on him. Finally the wife talked to her husband and let him have it about embarrassing her and bothering her at work and hung up the phone. She told the customer and the co-worker there at closing time that one of them would be in Jail by the end of the night. What the readers to these stories don't know is the Husband would never have gotten near his wife at work. WHY? The co-worker (female and best friend) has a CCW and carries a holstered DA .45.
Because of that woman and her gun is why this guy waited for his wife to come home. He laid in wait in the backyard waiting for her to open the back door and let the dogs out so he could attack her. While she was at work she had the protection of another women who was armed, at home she was not.


Police: Man stabbed estranged wife, then took his life

By Violet Law and Bobby Kerlik
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Wednesday, October 6, 2004


A man forced his way into his estranged wife's home in Brookline and fatally stabbed her with a butcher knife before killing himself Tuesday night, police said.
The bodies of Jeff and Lynn McFeely, who neighbors said were in their mid-40s, were found in the back yard of the home in the 1500 block of Berkshire Avenue. Pittsburgh police said they were called to the home at 8:20 p.m. for a report of a domestic dispute.

Neighbors said they heard screams for help but were kept from the back yard by the couple's two dogs.

Sandy Huetter, who lives across the street from the McFeelys, said her granddaughter heard the screaming.

Huetter said Lynn McFeely was a pleasant person and "was finally getting her life back together."

The couple's adult son, Dennis, was called by neighbors and arrived at the house before police.

Neighbors said Jeff McFeely was no longer living at the house and that his wife had recently obtained a protection-from-abuse order.

"Although it appears to be a murder-suicide, we are still investigating," police Lt. Kevin Kraus said.



Slain wife feared husband would try to take her life

By Violet Law
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Thursday, October 7, 2004


A month before her estranged husband killed her, Lynn McFeely wrote in a petition for a protective court order that she feared for her life.
"He threatened me, saying, 'I have one for you and one for me,' meaning a bullet," she wrote in a Sept. 7 petition for a protection-from-abuse order. "He has threatened me in the past with a gun."

Jeffrey McFeely killed his wife and himself with a large butcher knife as their horrified Brookline neighbors watched the domestic dispute unfold shortly after 8 p.m. Tuesday in the back yard of the McFeelys' Berkshire Avenue home, where they had lived for 25 years.

About three weeks ago, Jeffrey McFeely, 45, promised a family court judge he would relinquish his weapons and would not try to contact his wife.


Lynn McFeely, 46, said in her petition that her husband had suffered from depression and mood swings, had tossed and shattered objects, and had punched walls and doors. She also said he owned two handguns.

Lynn McFeely said in the petition that she fled from her home after her husband threatened her on Sept. 1.

"I left the residence," she wrote. "He chased me in his car. I went to a public place blowing my horn. He then left, and I have not been home since."

During a Sept. 16 hearing, a family court judge ordered Jeffrey McFeely to be evicted from the house.

Lynn McFeely was generally well-liked in the neighborhood, but her husband was known for his temper.

Neighbors wanted to intervene when they saw Jeffrey McFeely attacking his wife, but the family dogs chased away the would-be rescuers.

"People were trying to help her," said Sandy Huetter, who lives across the street.

One neighborhood friend called the couple's only child, Dennis. When he arrived, he found his parents collapsed in the back yard with fatal stab wounds to their chests.
 
What is not in these stories is the Husband was threatening her at work just one hour before. Her Job is three blocks from home. That night it was just her and the co-worker working at the business. Her co-worker kept answering the phone and hanging up on him. Finally the wife talked to her husband and let him have it about embarrassing her and bothering her at work and hung up the phone. She told the customer and the co-worker there at closing time that one of them would be in Jail by the end of the night. What the readers to these stories don't know is the Husband would never have gotten near his wife at work. WHY? The co-worker (female and best friend) has a CCW and carries a holstered DA .45.

And where is the proof behind this statement?
 
Regrettably, a common thread in these domestic killings is the ex-wife or estranged wife knows her man is dangerous, and yet she stays put in a location where he can find her and kill her.

I served a lot of restraining orders when I worked for the Sheriff. For the most part the restrained party got the hint and left his once significant other alone. However, there were those wild ones who weren't about to be stopped by a piece of paper issued by a guy who wears a black dress at work.

One afternoon I had an interesting telephone conversation with the sister of a woman who wanted her husband served a restraining order before he got out of prison. The sister was the strong one, who counseled the woman to get the restraining order. However, both had grave doubts the restraining order would have any effect on keeping the convict husband away.

In view of their fear the husband would not be stopped, I counseled that perhaps the wife should leave town, change her name, and get a new job. The woman I was talking to said her sister could not, would not leave town.

Continued conversation with the sister revealed that the woman was a kind, gentle soul, who would never consider arming herself and killing her husband if he came after her.

In view of what the sister told me, I suggested that she get together with her sister and discuss what funeral home they would be using and what hymms they wanted sung over the deceased' grave.

Pilgrim
 
Restraining orders work great against people who are being obnoxious. I have seen them put an end to annoying phone calls and "drop-ins". The problem is that these obnoxious characters are just that, obnoxious. They arent the guys who are going to end up killing anyone.

The people who ARE of the state of mind to kill a significant other/target of obsession will not be dettered in the slightest by a restraining order.

In other words restraining orders (AKA Protection Orders) work GREAT except for the cases when you REALLY need protection. Thats why we have .45ACP, 9mm, .357 etc....
 
Pilgrim said:

In view of their fear the husband would not be stopped, I counseled that perhaps the wife should leave town, change her name, and get a new job. The woman I was talking to said her sister could not, would not leave town.

Why should a woman be driven from her home, her friends, her job, her life by some abusive piece of walking, talking excrement? There's got to be a better answer than this.

On a feminist forum, I once proposed an "electronic restraining order". This would be similar to the ankle bracelets worn by those under house arrest. The person who took out the order would carry a transponder. If the restrainee approached her, two things would happen. An alert would be transmitted to the police, and the anklet would start emitting mild electric shocks. The shocks would get stronger the closer the restrainee gets, until at some predetermined range (pistol range, maybe?) they would reach Taser strength, putting the restrainee down till the cops could follow the signal and pick him up. There was a lively debate about this idea, and many supported it. What do you think?
 
Why should a woman be driven from her home, her friends, her job, her life by some abusive piece of walking, talking excrement? There's got to be a better answer than this.

Survival comes to mind.

On a feminist forum, I once proposed an "electronic restraining order". This would be similar to the ankle bracelets worn by those under house arrest. The person who took out the order would carry a transponder. If the restrainee approached her, two things would happen. An alert would be transmitted to the police, and the anklet would start emitting mild electric shocks.

An interesting idea, and it certainly should be explored. However, there is one point that may prevent this from immediately implemented on issuance of the order.

Restraining orders are initiated by serving the restrained party a Temporary Restraining Order and an Order to Show Cause. The TRO is frequently issued ex-parte, that is the restrained party frequently has no knowledge of the TRO until the Sheriff, Marshal, etc., serves him with the TRO/OSC.

In California at least, TROs in domestic violence matters often included an Immediate Moveout Order which compelled the restrained party to leave the house or apartment, which he often paid for, with no more than the clothes on his back and what clothing and personal effects he could collect in ten minutes. He then had to stay away, finding his own place to live, until the OSC hearing where he could plead his case that the proposed permanent restraining order was unnecessary, excesssive, and/or unwarranted.

As I posted earlier, I served a large number of TRO/OSCs. I thought they were more dangerous to serve than evictions because at least in the case of evictions, the person being evicted knew what was coming. You have no idea, unless it has been done to you, the inflamed emotions that arise when the Sheriff shows up without warning and tells you that you have ten minutes to pack some clothes and get out.

Currently electronic ankle bracelets are issued to people in house arrest or on pre trial supervised release, all related to criminal matters. It would take a big jump in judicial opinion and legislative action to clap ankle bracelets on people in matters considered to be non criminal, and based on an ex-parte order issued on the testimony of an emotionally distraught spouse who may have been encouraged to stretch the truth in order to get the order.

When I first started serving TRO/OSCs, I used to read the affidavit in support of the order. I remember one describing some very heinous acts by the restrained party in support of the order. I commented to the protected person, "He did this?" She answered, "Not really, but the counselor over at the community action center suggested I put it in so the judge would be more likely to issue the order to move him out." Essentially, the counselor and the protected party were engaged in a conspiracy to commit perjury.

I stopped asking questions about the affidavits after that.

I wouldn't give up on your idea. I can see where the U.S. Marshal could save lots of money in the Witness Protection Program by hanging ankle bracelets on all the Mafia wiseguys so they can't whack some Mafia rat.

Pilgrim
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top