usmarine0352_2005
member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2005
- Messages
- 2,796
.
I know some people have said that it's ok that we lose some cases such as Maryland's Woollard v. Gallagher since it will hopefully get to SCOTUS quicker.
However, what if SCOTUS chooses not to hear the case, then we are left with a loss that sets precedent.
Wouldn't it be better to win the case, since it appears most anti-gun cities are willing to appeal it to SCOTUS for us, and if they don't, it's a win?
.
I know some people have said that it's ok that we lose some cases such as Maryland's Woollard v. Gallagher since it will hopefully get to SCOTUS quicker.
However, what if SCOTUS chooses not to hear the case, then we are left with a loss that sets precedent.
Wouldn't it be better to win the case, since it appears most anti-gun cities are willing to appeal it to SCOTUS for us, and if they don't, it's a win?
.