Doesn't sound right. A lot of articles with 'stats' will spout different figures that make it seem like the NRA outspends all the 'grassroots' gun safety organizations.
Although I think we did blow our wad in the 1st quarter stopping another AWB, mag cap ban, and gun registration.
The quoted figures seem about right to me. The difference in the total amount contributed reflects a difference in intensity. Rank-and-file antigunners have a very shallow commitment, and are swayed by the emotions of the moment. (2013 was a high point for them, in the aftermath of Sandy Hook and during the full-press drive for gun control.) In contrast, gun owners have a vested, existential interest in the issue. Politicians truly fear committed, one-issue voters.
There is a big difference between changes and totals.
Grabbers increased their expenditures by more than we did, but the total spent is still in our favor.
Pro-gun total is $15 million vs. anti-gun of $2 million.
Interests favoring more control spent 824 percent more in 2013, totaling $2.2 million. Meanwhile, gun rights interests boosted spending by a smaller percentage—147 percent—but the total amount of $15.1 million dwarfed the control spending.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.